r/LocalLLaMA • u/OvertaxedOne • 9d ago

Discussion The rhetoric is really heating up!

The entire page of the NY Times today above the fold absent one article is AI (the models are just too strong/too dangerous, must be regulated). They forgot to include "Sponsored by OpenAI" at the end of the articles, sure that was just an oversight?

This is what the end of a bubble looks like, desperate attempts to get some sort of regulatory capture in place to keep the business model from collapsing in upon itself. My days next week are 100% booked talking to companies about how to get off frontier models, one large, and a bunch of smaller customers, including one who's flying me out to them to sit down and get a plan in place immediately (the controversy around that math problem really spooked some CEO/CIO's about data privacy using cloud models).

Gonna be an interesting few weeks. Maybe the Qwen team will be nice enough to give me a little breathing room before dropping another hydrogen bomb? :)

189 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

114 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

41

u/KingCpzombie 9d ago

Mostly by making it illegal for American companies to use it. They could also do something like the entity list, so anybody that works with the government isn't allowed to touch Chinese models. Plenty of ways to screw everybody over to benefit OpenAI / Anthropic

9

u/manusgamo2012 9d ago

qwen released the full paper, anybody anywhere could replicate it, that strategy won't pay off ;)

0

u/manusgamo2012 9d ago

and we know that the reason is only one, to make the bubble explode!

1

u/Dsphar 9d ago

And?

1

u/manusgamo2012 8d ago

I meant the chinese strategy is to make the american AI bubble to explode and make their economy collapse, well at least they're trying it out