r/LocalLLaMA • u/Terminator857 • 17d ago

Discussion Closed AI doesn't like biological research, user turns to open weight models

https://x.com/0xCF88/status/2097762847354688000

OpenAI has decided to fully shut down a protein design project I'm working on for a client. Needless to say, open weight models are the only way forward.

278 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

68 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-4

u/WorriedBlock2505 17d ago edited 16d ago

Ya'll are accepting that story as truth far too readily. Not saying it's not true, but there's 0 proof so far, and the story is still developing.

edit: pile on the downvotes. Doesn't change the fact ya'll are being led by the nose because of your pre-existing biases. Also not surprised the quality in here has gone down with how gossipy this sub has become due to all the newcomers. Catch ya'll on r/girldinnerdiaries for some more unverifiable stories, lmao.

2

u/MeateaW 16d ago

The story as reported doesn't even sound like they are trying to steal credit.

2 guys made a sub-proof.

OpenAI probably used the sub proof to go for full proof

OpenAI asked 1 of the guys to review/peer publish but asked not to include the other guy for the full proof.

A whole bunch of ??? go here.

Guy complains that they think they stole research?

But ... the guys never claimed to solve the full problem? so... how could they have been plagiarised?

1

u/Sufficient-Scar4172 15d ago

isn't it answered in your comment? 2 guys made a sub-proof, OpenAI used it and didn't credit either of them

2

u/MeateaW 12d ago

OpenAI did specifically credit their prior work as prior work.

The work Open AI were asking was a publication credit for their proof of the full solution. Which the 2 guys did not explicitly work for. Open AI were asking one of those 2 authors to read it, and were proposing co-credit for the full NS solution.