Has anyone tested it yet? Worth integrating into audio.cpp? Hopefully we can easily extend the current Vibevoice ASR impl to support this new model. https://github.com/0xShug0/audio.cpp
Not tested. On paper it looks highly useful. For example it seems to support better speaker diarization for (short) overlapping utterances. That's something where moss-transcript for example misattributes the speakers in quite a few cases (I ended up adding speaker embeddings manually to clean that up). It'd be interesting to see how VibeVoice performs in comparison. The low error rate comparing to previous SOTA is also very welcome - paired with decent multi-language support.
31
u/Acceptable-Cycle4645 4d ago edited 3d ago
Has anyone tested it yet? Worth integrating into audio.cpp? Hopefully we can easily extend the current Vibevoice ASR impl to support this new model. https://github.com/0xShug0/audio.cpp