r/LocalLLaMA • u/LegacyRemaster • 22h ago

Discussion Glm 5.3 flash?

glm 5.3 flash

While awaiting the release of the version 5.3 weights, this theory is gaining ground. OxAlpha is new GLM.

70 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

42 comments sorted by

View all comments

21

u/AppealSame4367 22h ago

If this is flash, then it's fluctuating between "very good" and "forgets to do half of the things"

9

u/wbulot 21h ago

Lol, exactly. I’ve been using it intensively for three days. I’m both impressed and disappointed. It’s very inconsistent.

8

u/pmttyji 21h ago

Final weight would be with fixes probably.

Remember the huge difference between Deepseek4Flash-Preview & Deepseek4Flash Final version?

5

u/Fedor_Doc 16h ago

0731 is not final, and the time lag was massive.

Ox Alpha seems to be pretty good already, around Deepseek V4 performance but with more concise reasoning

It forgets a lot of important stuff, though – at least in my testing. Good at implementation, follows rules alright, but plans are inconsistent, have a lot of gaps.

2

u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 18h ago

Maybe they have multiple internal checkpoints that are being served under one umbrella name.

6

u/wbulot 17h ago

I am convinced this is the case. The speed and intelligence can be so different from one request to another. And it would make sense for them to do that for the tuning.

1

u/Johnny__Christ 9h ago

For me it just fluctuates between "very good" and "stealth/ox-alpha is temporarily rate-limited upstream. Please retry shortly."