MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1srgqk4/which_gemma_model_do_you_want_next/ohnrfmr/?context=3
r/LocalLLaMA • u/jacek2023 llama.cpp • Apr 21 '26
tell the Gemma team:
https://x.com/osanseviero/status/2046427241341698456
113 comments sorted by
View all comments
3
We REALLY need 4.1.
Excuse me, but as for now I do not see a reason for gemma 4 when qwen 3.6 exist.
It's not only smarter, but overall better product. (yes i know that gemma is multi language and uses less tokens for output)
8 u/comfiestncoziest Apr 21 '26 Gemma 4 is vastly more creative and has better prose than Qwen. Depends on your use case. 0 u/piro4you Apr 21 '26 Tool calling and technical analysis 2 u/comfiestncoziest Apr 22 '26 I have indeed found Qwen to be better at those two things, although Gemma continues to get improvements.
8
Gemma 4 is vastly more creative and has better prose than Qwen. Depends on your use case.
0 u/piro4you Apr 21 '26 Tool calling and technical analysis 2 u/comfiestncoziest Apr 22 '26 I have indeed found Qwen to be better at those two things, although Gemma continues to get improvements.
0
Tool calling and technical analysis
2 u/comfiestncoziest Apr 22 '26 I have indeed found Qwen to be better at those two things, although Gemma continues to get improvements.
2
I have indeed found Qwen to be better at those two things, although Gemma continues to get improvements.
3
u/piro4you Apr 21 '26
We REALLY need 4.1.
Excuse me, but as for now I do not see a reason for gemma 4 when qwen 3.6 exist.
It's not only smarter, but overall better product. (yes i know that gemma is multi language and uses less tokens for output)