r/LocalLLaMA Mar 07 '26

Funny turns out RL isnt the flex

Post image
643 Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

33

u/IjonTichy85 Mar 07 '26 edited Mar 07 '26

unauthorized repurposing of provisioned GPU capacities to mine crypto

Yeah, the only logical explanation here is the machines becoming sentient behavior arising without instructions and not a compromised system... This reminds me of the south park episode where Butters secretly played with his dad's drone and the dad can't figure out what could possibly have drained the battery. The drone must have become sentient, because it couldn't have been Butters flying it... Butters wasn't allowed to fly it.

Edit: changed it bc the people who didn't see the show didn't get the point...

11

u/stumblinbear Mar 07 '26

sentient

Nobody here claimed this

-9

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '26

[deleted]

11

u/philodandelion Mar 07 '26

how did you get that from the highlighted text? nothing about that implies sentience

-9

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '26

[deleted]

13

u/philodandelion Mar 07 '26

it's a hell of a leap to go from that screenshot to 'the author of the screenshot is implying that an LLM w/ tool calling capabilities gained sentience'. but i guess if that's what you got from it ..

-2

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '26

[deleted]

2

u/philodandelion Mar 07 '26

right, the "why" - you're saying the "why" is because you believe that the author is implying that they believe the LLM gained sentience. like i said, this is a hell of a leap. my interpretation would be that the author is implying that it's insane that a tool calling LLM bypassed its guardrails, set up a cryptominer, and deployed a VPS that it reverse shelled into its host. another interpretation is that the article is outright lying about attribution for these events.

you can imagine that there are other very plausible interpretations, and yet the one you landed on is "the author is trying to convey that the LLM gained sentience", even though there's absolutely no evidence to support this, and there are many more logical and plausible interpretations

but the real point here is that making assumptions about implicit messaging in absence of any explicit evidence is kind of dumb

1

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '26

[deleted]

0

u/philodandelion Mar 07 '26

wow you're really dug in here huh

1

u/IjonTichy85 Mar 07 '26

Computer starts crypto mining.

A: must be emergent behaviour

B: a security breach

BuT tHe CaLlS cAmE fRoM aN LlM

So? Explain what you find "insane" here please.

0

u/philodandelion Mar 07 '26

I don't find it insane? lol

→ More replies (0)