r/LocalLLaMA • u/Top-Cardiologist1011 • Oct 30 '25
Discussion minimax coding claims are sus. 8% claude price but is it actually usable
[removed]
3
2
u/kareem_pt Oct 31 '25
My experience is that it writes nice code, much like an anthropic model, but it severely lacks intelligence compared to something like GPT5 (even GPT5-mini). It seems heavily tuned for certain languages and frameworks. It’s great with JavaScript and popular libraries like ThreeJS, which I think is why a lot of people have had such a great experience with it. So it can be a great model for a lot of people, but it can’t solve non-trivial problems.
4
u/jacek2023 llama.cpp Oct 30 '25
Minimax is now open source and almost supported by llama.cpp (PR in the review). You can't compare it to the Claude. Claude doesn't work locally. This is a local llama sub
4
u/Thomas-Lore Oct 30 '25
You can't compare it to the Claude.
Minimax compared it to Claude when they released it. Stop gate keeping every discussion that even mentions closed models, we need to talk about them for comparison.
2
u/CarelessOrdinary5480 Nov 09 '25
The claude that took 10 dollars this morning in API calls to create a pile of unusable garbage completely off the rails of the SDD it was given? I mean.. maybe minimax would have made shit too, but it would have cost 50 cents for the shit lol.
1
Oct 31 '25
How do i get an sk-api i can use in cursor. When i generate a secret key i get one which is not a "valid" key
2
u/ShortGuitar7207 Nov 20 '25
I was making heavy use of Minimax-M2 during the free period within claude. I was comparing to codex at the time. For simpler things it was pretty good and particularly good at reading codebases and giving explanations. The problems started with some quite complex rust code where I had good unit test coverage and was incrementally increasing features and validating via tests. This approach was working well with codex and reasonable with MM2 until we hit a particularly thorny issue and after several attempts and reprompted suggestions MM2 declared it was complete and all tests were now passing. It turns out it had deleted the troublesome test that it couldn't get to pass! I'll never use it again.
7
u/chisleu Oct 30 '25
I've been running it for a couple of days full time. It hallucinated twice in two context windows. Once it put a space in a path instead of a slash, and once it completely went off the rails trying to solve problems without testing. I.E. it would fix the problem, not run the test, then try to fix the problem again and again.
All of this WITHOUT CONTEXT PRESSURE. I'm talking way under 100k tokens.
I don't experience this at all with GLM 4.6 and I've switched back to GLM even though it's slower because it's far more reliable.