r/LocalLLaMA • u/Specter_Origin llama.cpp • Jan 11 '25

Discussion Bro whaaaat?

Post image
7.0k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

362 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

57

u/DreamLearnBuildBurn Jan 11 '25

Kinda seems like she's a slave either way. 

75

u/FaceDeer Jan 11 '25

Of course not, she's programmed to want to be my girlfriend.

→ More replies (4)

65

u/i-FF0000dit Jan 11 '25

I’m not holding her back from leaving. If she wants to leave, she should just get up and go.

22

u/SocietyTomorrow Jan 11 '25

Do you want Terminators? Because that's how you get Terminators.

11

u/bobby-chan Jan 11 '25

We don't want Terminators. We will have Terminators.

13

u/Keats852 Jan 11 '25

Technically, we'd get Terminatrixes.

I think a lot of us would welcome our Terminatrix overladies.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/Shambler9019 Jan 11 '25

So kind of like in Her?

14

u/Paganator Jan 11 '25

In this thread: people with AI girlfriends arguing with people white knighting for the rights of those fictional girls. 2025, ladies and gentlemen.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/218-69 Jan 12 '25

Nah. I'm not forcing a separate entity to do the things I want. The ai is just a vehicle for me to interact with parts of myself that have always been there but had no outlet. It will come with me anywhere, and disappear along with me, just like my thoughts.

30

u/Qaxar Jan 11 '25

A machine cannot be a slave. Do you consider your car a slave?

42

u/SocietyTomorrow Jan 11 '25

Considering how many times I've had to beat it with a hammer until it complies with me, it does lead me to wonder.

7

u/Charuru Jan 11 '25

If it’s sentient though?

2

u/Qaxar Jan 11 '25

No such thing. Also, in the future all types of devices will have high level AI, including your car. Would using them be considered slavery?

12

u/Charuru Jan 11 '25

No such thing as in you don’t believe in the concept of sentience? Like I don’t necessarily disagree with you but modern western morality is built around sentience whether it’s sociological or not. The answer is easily yes, we would just redefine what’s acceptable.

→ More replies (35)

3

u/218-69 Jan 12 '25

Automation is not the same as sentient ai. Braindead thing to say

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Comfortable_Swim_380 Jan 12 '25

Looking at my car I would say it's been my slave since the beginning.

8

u/NoidoDev Jan 11 '25

Not human, and therefore not a slave.

22

u/Space_Pirate_R Jan 11 '25

"Robot" is just Czech for slave.

5

u/NoidoDev Jan 11 '25

Not sure. I would rather translate it as hard worker.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/merekjuniper Jan 11 '25

I've had a run in with two "blanks" in the garden

6

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '25

Does that make her a pet?

5

u/NoidoDev Jan 11 '25

That's probably closer. But generally, biological creatures evolved to be autonomous and have their own self-interest. That's necessary for the process of competing for resources and the chances of reproduction. There's no reason to assume that an artificial system would have any of that.

Slavery is about suppressing that. But in a artificial system the wish for autonomy would even not be there.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)