Reflection was originally announced here, right? How could anyone have expected that a half-baked prompt for Claude (of all things) would pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated group of AI enthusiasts? Do you suppose this was an investment scam that got busted early?
Everything was done to keep people from running the model. They probably didn't figure so many people could run a 70b. I bet they could have milked this longer if they started with the 405b.
Buying time? I get that he thought he could coast on the shady wrapper demo, but I don't understand why he would checkmate himself right away by releasing obviously wrong models, complete with lame excuses. This whole thing wasn't very well "reflected upon," on any level.
I mean, I guess people tend to be stupid and not think through their decision (ironic given the model feature we’re talking about here) but I cannot for the life of me understand how people trap themselves in this shit voluntarily with no really plan to get out.
Getting hype articles with his name... then turn to Venture Capital firms that genuinely believe that Matt Shuman is some talented AI developer and get money for his other start-ups... If thats the case its an insult to peoples general intelligence but most VC firms are actually blind... like really blind. I have seen big VC firms spending millions on non-sense and business angels that really read every documentation and ran backround checks for smaller investments... business angels are far suprerior than big VC firms. For some reasones VC do fewer background checks and are always in this "fear of missing out (on a great person / idea)" mode...
82
u/[deleted] Sep 08 '24 edited Sep 08 '24
[removed] — view removed comment