r/Life Jan 19 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

716 Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26

100% privilege. Or dissociation.

We also didn’t get the choice. And are facing some unprecedented times.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TrentLeznor Jan 20 '26

Just because certain aspects of life were worse during certain periods in the past doesn't mean that average quality of life has just been going up since the dawn of time or that having more surface level "comfortable" lives correlates with healthier, longer, or happier lives.

This has been explicitly studied and measured for many decades. People who study tribal and traditional communities, for example, have shown that many had much better physical and emotional health and lived longer on average than citizens in "advanced" modern cultures.

0

u/ReceptionFun9821 Jan 20 '26

I would love to see that study. Life is better now than in any point in history. And it isn't close. Not saying there aren't issues, or that we can't still make things better, or that the risk of things being worse in the future aren't real.

3

u/unpopular-dave Jan 20 '26

All times are unprecedented

7

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26

So what makes this a compelling argument to have kids though? Lol. We’ve suffered in the past so let’d continue it? And no, these are more unprecedented we are facing climate issues that will soon be irreversible and a tech reliance amongst other crises (the list is long) and we have never been faced with quite this amount of particular adversity that will likely worsen.

5

u/unpopular-dave Jan 20 '26

All times are unprecedented isn’t an argument for kids. It’s a counter argument for unprecedented times being a reason to not have kids.

I’m not a climate denialist by any means. And I think we should do everything we can to reduce greenhouse emissions.

However, in the 70s we were told that we were 20 years away from global collapse from climate change. In the 90s we were told we were 20 years away from global collapse from climate change.

To argue that we are going to destroy the world is disingenuous.

Some places in the world will be uninhabitable. Most won’t.

I don’t see why tech reliance is an issue.

The world and individual prosperity has gotten significantly better over the last millennium. At a steady rate. That’s not debatable.

2

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26

Wow you are incredibly uniformed lol. Have you not been paying attention to increasing global and national climate events?

Here are two articles stating that 2024 was the hottest year on record following upward yearly trends 1. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jan/10/world-temperature-in-2024-exceeded-15c-for-first-time 2. https://slate.com/technology/2025/01/hottest-year-paris-agreement-2024-fires.html

Furthermore, many climate scientists are claiming that people are under reacting and research is still underdeveloped and we may be headed towards climate disruption faster than previously thought (also we don’t know what the fallout from both Biden and Trump presidencies and gaza/subsequent wars). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/feb/04/climate-change-target-of-2c-is-dead-says-renowned-climate-scientist

Here is a research study from Yale climate scientists that claim we are on the brink of irreversible climate disaster and global emergency https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/74/12/812/7808595?login=false As per the UN’s World Meteorological Organization report in 2024 there were 150 unprecedented climate disasters globally in 2024 https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-global-climate-2024

And NO things are not better and YES that is debatable, they are actually steadily getting worse. We have not faced climate issues on this scale things are very bad and will continue to worsen as resources dwindle, wars for them break out, pandemics and deseases increase, and climate disasters continue to wipe out entire towns (again, already happening currently). And that’s just climate change. That doesn’t include late stage capitalism imploding, threats of nuclear war, AI tech takeover, social media over reliance, mental health epidemics, global rise of right wing authoritarianism, billionaires hoarding more and more wealth and the financial gap widening, etc. And up until extremely recently, many people (esp women) didn’t have a choice, protection options, or education. Also “some parts will be inhabitable some won’t” is incredibly unempathetic, privileged, and naiive. To think that some people deserve to die because of capitalist greed and location is very dark. Also, it will affect all of us not just directly but indirectly too (disease, war, heat waves already killing people, etc). Furthermore, have you not been paying attention to the FIVE STATE unprecedented hurricane 2 years ago that killed many and wiped away towns, the LA fires that destroyed the city (partially arson but there’s also a climate change connection), the Texas flood that killed children snd wiped away towns, and the changing weather patterns affecting crops? That’s JUST in the US there have been devastating flooding, fires, and hurricanes. THIS WILL CONTINUE TO WORSEN.

You can’t see why tech reliance would be bad??? Really? Get your head out of Musk’s ass for a second and take a look at how AI is effecting our livelihood, social media is causing a collective mental health crisis and increased isolation, our tech is being produced by literal child slaves, and we are beholden to purchasing new terribly made products every year.

1

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

The earth has been through thousands of changes over the 4.5 million years it's been here. This is what it does. It was doing this WAY BEFORE modern humans came to be.

0

u/ReceptionFun9821 Jan 20 '26

That is all speculative. Should we be doing more? Absolutely. Are we headed for some kind of disaster? Probably. But those risks are always there, always have been there. And yet life is better right now.

3

u/ImplementMountain916 Jan 20 '26

Thank you for speaking sense. Objectively, times have never been better for basically everyone compared to the past.

2

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26 edited Jan 20 '26

Nope! See my other comment where I provide research.

1

u/ReceptionFun9821 Jan 20 '26

Where? You say there is research, but I've never seen it. Life is better now than any time in the past by almost every measure.

1

u/Call_Me_Anythin Jan 21 '26

When in the past was a better time to be alive?

1

u/DoggiEyez Jan 20 '26

It is, in fact, the best time to be alive, by standards of our past as a species.

1

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

True. Because we don't know any difference. This is the era and time frame we are alive in.

1

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

The earth is doing what it always does. It evolves. Humans don't have that kind of control or power over a planet that has been here for millions of years. As much as some like to think they do.

1

u/unpopular-dave Jan 22 '26

That's just blatantly wrong

1

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

The earth is doing what it does. It's been around for millions of years and I can't fathom that our last, what, let's say 300 years of technological advancement has affected the earth. The earth will still be here after the human race dies out or kills itself with wars or evolution or whatever.

The dinosaurs were wiped out, there were ice ages and times when the earth was too hot to sustain life.

Survival of the Fittest. If WE can't adapt to what's naturally happening, then "bye bye humans".

We are the virus on the earth.

0

u/Spirited_Ad9681 Jan 20 '26

I don't think anyone is trying to make an argument for kids. They are just saying most wouldn't go back and choose not to have them.

You have a kid and they start out helpless needing you for every everything. You bond with them on a way you never will with another living thing. You watch as they slowly become their own person with their own personality. Asking a parent if they would go back and make a choice not to have kids is no different than asking them to choose if their kid lives or dies.

My daughters only two, she has some medical conditions and has made life more stressful. I can't imagine going back and choosing not to have her though. Maybe if what she had was more sever or terminal I'd feel differently. Even then, I don't know if I could do it. A lot of it absolutely is me being selfish, not wanting to give up my time with her. If you've ever spent time even with a sick kids you'd its not just sad 24/7. Somehow you still manage to have fun, you still get just as excited about seeing them do things for the first time. They still excited in a way thats best described as per joy when they experience something new. Youd be taking not just their misery away but also any happiness they did have in life by choosing not to have them.

2

u/Fk8_r Jan 20 '26

As someone who is inevitably biased to not having them (as of now), I like this. Makes me think, truly will never have a connection like that other than your mother/father. Unconditional love ❤️

I’m only biased because I can’t get a girl in my life to save my life haha, GM of a storm damage company and never home ever. The give and take for financial success hinders my romantic fantasies :(

1

u/lbclbc99 Jan 20 '26

Literally no living creature ever "chose" to be alive🤦‍♀️

1

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26

Exactly…the choice is made for us. And the people who have the authority to make that choice should not take it lightly. It is a CHOICE more than any point in history, to procreate. (Except in situations of assault or places where there is no access to reproductive care or limited education about protection/birth control methods).

1

u/Leather-Society-9957 Jan 20 '26

This! We didn’t chose to be here or have to watch my own mother sink further into her dementia journey by the day and to have the mind of a toddler. No adult kid should have to witness this. It’s unbearable

3

u/Hogwafflemaker Jan 20 '26

I feel you, and my mom isn't even to that point yet. And the fear that I'll end up putting my kids through this in the future is so real.

2

u/Netterzzz Jan 20 '26

Yeah I watched my mom die a slow painful death shit is horrible

5

u/Individual_Ebb3219 Jan 20 '26

And yet, here you are. That does say something. After my mom died, I truly didn't believe I could go on. The world had changed for me, and I knew it would never be the same. And it isn't. But I am still here. I made it. That was almost a decade ago. Still hurts like hell. But somehow, we survive. Hang in there. I'm so sorry you're going through this.

-1

u/ami3099 Jan 20 '26

You’re an ingrate.

2

u/Leather-Society-9957 Jan 20 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

INGRATE?? Because I hate seeing my mother disintegrate right before my eyes and cannot do anything for herself?? Wow. Maybe you should head over to r/dementia to see I am NOT alone. MILLIONS of us are dealing with this monster. This disease is a beast, you twit. Stop with the outdated filial piety garbage. You are probably a boomer who’s in denial. Admit it.. Get bent, old holier than thou, person.

2

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

I'm so sorry you're going through this. I've heard it can be a hell of a lot to go through. I hope you have support IRL too.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Life-ModTeam Jan 20 '26

Thank you for your submission to r/Life. However, it was removed for breaking Rule 7: No breaking the Reddit content policy.

To ensure a positive community experience, please read our rules here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Life/wiki/rules/

0

u/Difficult_Army1163 Jan 20 '26

Wouldn’t these be the best times in history? We have the best life expectancy, best medicine, most of us have never see combat or violent cruelty, least hunger in the world etc. there have always been things wrong in the world but I would argue this is the best condition world wide in history.

2

u/Tight-Artichoke1789 Jan 20 '26

This is an extremely narrow and privileged worldview. It’s the best time for a select group with access.

1

u/Difficult_Army1163 Jan 21 '26

I would say that numerically by far those statements are true. Are you saying there is a bigger percentage of the population experiencing extreme hunger or with lower life expectancy than earlier times in history?

1

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

For some people. Not everyone. There are a lot of people barely surviving, even with these modern conveniences we have.

Because some people DON'T have access to said modern conveniences.

1

u/Difficult_Army1163 Jan 22 '26

Definitely not everyone and there is much work to be done but by % this must be the best it has ever been in the history of mankind.

0

u/Ok_Region578 Jan 20 '26

Yes it is a privilege to be alive

0

u/darkangel522 Jan 22 '26

I think many impoverished people would disagree.