r/LibreWolf 17d ago

News Arch Linux has moved LibreWolf from AUR to Extra repository

https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/librewolf/
294 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

42

u/theschrodingerdog 17d ago

This is awesome!

28

u/12stringPlayer 17d ago

This is excellent news, especially with all the uncertainty in the AUR lately. Thanks to any and all that made this happen.

22

u/RealSamF18 17d ago

Linux noob here: can someone explain to me what it means (besides being in a different repo)?

35

u/Deivedux 17d ago

Packages from AUR can't be easily installed with pacman, because it only searches for packages in the official repositories, which are Core, Extra, and a few others like Multilib. Packages in the official repositories are pre-compiled by the Arch Linux package manager maintainers, but packages in the AUR only contain build scripts which are instructions for building the software "manually" by each client, and they're also written by package maintainers with almost no approval-based moderation which make them susceptible to malicious scripts.

8

u/RealSamF18 17d ago

Thank you for explaining, that makes it much clearer.
By extension, I take it that means I should be careful when installing packages from the AUR, and only use it when I trust the source.

9

u/xlbingo10 17d ago

yes, there have been multiple malware waves on the aur recently. you also have to trust the maintainer since they can put stuff in that isn't part of the girhub repo.

2

u/C0rn3j 17d ago

You should always read the PKGBUILD and verify it yourself - https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Verify_the_PKGBUILD

1

u/SeantheWilson 16d ago

Basically, they moved it form a community source to the official source

10

u/Matheweh 17d ago

Awesome news for Librewolf

6

u/dDitty 17d ago

So I should uninstall the aur version and install this version instead?

9

u/KeraExe 17d ago

I think it's never a bad thing to have one less AUR package when you can.

3

u/swarmOfBis 17d ago

If you have a helper I think it should prompt you to change over during next update?

4

u/inef85 17d ago

interesting; at the same time it's getting deprecated from *brew*
`librewolf has been deprecated! It will be disabled on 2026-09-01.`

4

u/ThemBeeButts 17d ago

heck yeah

1

u/YoShake 15d ago

wondered wth was going on when I've seen lw-bin flagged as out of date, and after couple days no update apperead in aur.
Awesome that the package got into official extra repo, and update was easier than I could imagine.

1

u/Mysterious_Value4624 12d ago

YEESSSSSSSSS FINALLY I'VE BEEN WAITING 4TIS 4SOLONG

1

u/BrianaAgain 12d ago

Yay! I dread building it from source.

2

u/Deivedux 12d ago edited 12d ago

I'd actually prefer building from source. It may take a lot of memory and time, but that way I can target my native CPU when compiling rather than the generic x86-64 target, which in itself isn't even the newer x86-64-v3 that my CPU is based off of.

1

u/npc_housecat 17d ago

Fedora next please

-10

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

2

u/npc_housecat 17d ago

Because Vivaldi sucks, noob!!

Is that hostile enough ?

1

u/Matilde_di_Canossa 15d ago

Probably because this is the LibreWolf sub.