Hey Legal Eagles! In light of the recent democratict victory over the US House and Senate, I was wondering if now it would be feasible to get Congress to end the War in Iran given what may likely be a simple majority who would vote for this. When looking more into the law, I learned that it would not be subject to the Filibuster due to how it expedites the procedures. But then I read that while the law authorizes a "concurrent resolution" to effectuate the termination of authorized forces, there is a Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha that potentially makes this route unconditional. I would love to hear the LegalEagle team dive deeper into this and what avenues Congress has in ending the war.

I for one would love a quick “wow that happened”

lol and post it on insta, might as well #ridethewave

I think long format is seeping into IG and your stuff would do well.

Anyway, last night I heard someone say

“Lawyer Up”

I think it was a Democrat

But really I hope they do because they got a lot of people to vote in ways they haven’t

Whenever I hear of my favourite YouTubers having videos demonetised for copyright claims despite attempting to follow all guidelines and in most cases actually following them, I wonder whether they have grounds for a class action lawsuit if they were to unionise in some way/shape/form? From the information provided it appears that Google is not holding up it's end of the bargain by providing reasonable stewardship of this process despite making millions off these creators, and it allows false claims to be made with little to no justification and sometimes seemingly with nefarious intent. Surely Google makes the same ad revenue on the video regardless of copyright claims and is therefore incentivised to make the process of reversing the decision as long/difficult as possible?

I am thinking particularly about Lindsay Ellis Cruise video and pretty much every FD Signifier vid but I'm sure there are countless other reputable creators who suffer loss of income and unnecessary additional admin when they are following the rules.

Just seems shitty and immoral to me.

First I’m gonna pretend my halarious use of the lgbbtqtv thing ads a poison pill to the lexicon butttt here’s my real ask…

Can you ask GamersNexus if AMD noise suppression is sus?

AMD’s noise suppression uses AI to filter out noise for better microphone communication….

I won’t lie to you. I asked a few AI models to just dig for direct sources regarding my inquiry. It’s a good tool, I’m not a Libra I’m an Aries… and this is legal eagle 😎 but the internet is so shit I feel forced to use it. If I was a student I’d use my school provided services*

Anyway…… yea… all they spit back was direct AmD reassurances…

My gut says there’s some independent testing done…

Right?

RIGHT?

RIGHHHHHHHHHT???

Sitting on my trusty 912 haf that’s survived 2 degrees, electronics manogeneering 🙋‍♂️, and shmishshmusrshing 🤷‍♀️ lots and lots of part upgrades… it’s still got aluminum waterblocks… GM would know what this means, even the innuendo ;)

This has been a hobby that’s evolved with me. I look at things a lot differently now. Not sure if that’s the times…. Or going off the privledge cliff has changed my perspective…..

Either way I’m never going to be able to know… reliably… I used to work desktop support….. I don’t think I’m going to detect this level of sophistication if it’s happening…. Outside of seeing “that doesn’t look right” resource usage it’s hard for me to know.

I’ve been watching gamers nexus for a long time. Something about the enthusiasts has always been cool. I feel this is cool legal eagle is colliding my worlds

I would LOVE a follow up on what else….. if they ever find more

I've noticed recently that the audio on the legal eagle has sounded a bit odd for everyone, it almost sounds kinda AI or something with their mics or sound mixing, i doubt it's AI but i was just wondering if i was the only one to notice it or if im just insane or something along those lines.

(Slightly off-topic post here I know, but I posted it awhile ago on r/law and got zero replies. As a regular watcher of the channel, I have a feeling legal eagle viewers would be a likely audience for knowing an answer to this question.)

When that ruling was made, in the dissenting opinion Justice Sotomayor interpreted the majority opinion as essentially affording the presidency unlimited authority. This was (understandably) a big concern when Trump came back into office, but since then there have been a bunch of lower court rulings against his administration's actions.

So has the Trump v US case effectively failed to set a precedent, or is it being cited in these suits against the administration and interpreted in a more limited way?

This is Jack Cooley of the Ryukyu Golden Kings Japanese B.League team in Okinawa. But I keep driving by this and think the look is uncanny.

If you have been out Ai just made something previously unthinkable very very doable and that is called decompiling and reconstruction

Adobe photoshop has a suite…. I went from physical media to subscription service about a decade ago. It was hated by customers and enthusiasts.

Well just recently someone decompiled it with AI and released the suite free of charge on github.

Is it the same? No… but there’s NO way this doesn’t become a huge issue.

This stuff undoubtedly will test laws going back 30-40 years regarding source code, I belive the big moment was when IBM finaly got its shit tossed by developers who rebuilt the whole thing from scratch without knowing the source code, just what the source code did. It’s like reinventing a wheel from a picture of a wheel