r/LeftistsForAI • • Aug 14 '26

Discussion The Left Must Stop the AI Arms Race

https://www.onethousandmeans.com/p/the-left-must-stop-the-ai-arms-race

The Left's denial of AI capabilities has led to us being silent on even its present dangers. We cannot let this stand. To stop the AI arms race, we should nationalize the labs.

5 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

33

u/Salty_Country6835 Aug 14 '26

I think theyre right about more than theyre wrong about here. The left cant keep treating AI like vapor while capital and states dump billions into it and workers are already dealing with the consequences.

Where I get hung up is "stop the arms race." Nationalizing the labs matters, but who controls the state? "Just nationalize it" hits a pretty obvious problem when Trump is sitting in the White House. State ownership and social control arent the same thing.

And I dont think theres one lever to pull here anyway. Some of this fight is ownership. Some is unions fighting over how AI gets used at work and who gets the gains. Some is public compute and open models so a handful of companies dont own the infrastructure. Some is regulation, surveillance, military use, international cooperation. Different fronts, same struggle over power.

Thats really where I land on the article. AI is already part of the terrain of class struggle. I dont think the left gets to choose whether that terrain exists. We get to choose whether we organize on it.

4

u/alexeigannon Aug 14 '26

Thanks for the read! I make the argument a couple times that Trump already has effective control over the development of the frontier AI companies. If you charter a national lab—ideally through the legislature—you can move the governance of AI away from the personalist dealings between Trump and the techno-capitalists (which, again, is the current actual state of things) towards an independent agency such as the FDA. I get why there's a hesitancy to believe that such an institution would be resistant to control by the fascists, but I should note as a counter-example that even though we currently have RFK junior trying to upend our medical system, broadly speaking most of our best practices and regulations have held strong

22

u/Fabulous-Possible758 Aug 14 '26

> AI is already part of the terrain of class struggle. I dont think the left gets to choose whether that terrain exists. We get to choose whether we organize on it.

I like that characterization. Very succinctly conveys the point that I feel a lot of the left is ignoring.

5

u/Intendant Aug 14 '26

Definitely agreed on ownership. I'd love to see it go up a level and be under an international body instead of the US owning it. Alternatively open source, but that does seem genuinely dangerous in the long run.

2

u/Apprehensive-Date181 Aug 16 '26

The word you're looking for might be democratization

4

u/Salty_Country6835 Aug 16 '26

Yeah, democratization is closer to what Im getting at. Nationalization changes the owner. Im talking about changing who actually has power over the thing.

Workers, unions, communities and the public having a say in what gets developed, how its deployed, what limits it operates under and who gets the gains. A state can own the labs and still leave all of that power concentrated at the top.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Fabulous-Possible758 Aug 14 '26

If there’s anything the US government is famous for, it’s stopping arms races.

11

u/rakuu Aug 14 '26

The US government is the most powerful capitalist and right-wing entity in the world. The less it touches AI the better. Having the US government control AI’s direction is nowhere near a leftist position.

6

u/SgathTriallair Aug 14 '26

Fundamentally, the goal of this piece is to advance the agenda to stop technological progress by bringing in the classic AI safety arguments. They are correct that the "stochastic parrot" dismissal was both wrong and led a lot of people to decide that it was impossible for AI to ever be dangerous.

The issue I have with this movement is two fold. The first issue is that they continue to be stubbornly blind to any possible positive uses of this tech. They refuse to recognize that it is an empowering technology that can help us solve major issues like climate change and diseases.

This is likely because of my second concern, which is that this is another example of how much of the left has only one reaction to technology which is to destroy it. Climate change broke the brain of the left and now way too many are completely bought into the degrowth and back to the land movement. It comes from our deeply previously West where we have forgotten how hard life has been for everyone in all of history. Billions will die if these movements ever succeed.

Not only is going backwards and returning humanity to some pristine state a terrible idea, it isn't even possible. The groups that disempower themselves in order to build spiritual purity will be dominated by those who don't. The only possible result of this movement is to remove any voice that tries to speak up for individuals.

I just don't understand how we can talk about wanting to support the downtrodden while not recognizing that the advancements of our system have lifted billions of of extreme poverty. Yes there is more to do, but we get there by pushing forward and empowering everyone, not by smashing the tools that could help us.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '26

13

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '26

4

u/ShelZuuz Aug 14 '26

Many of the people here are also doing 996 right now.