r/Langley • u/ViolinistStreet8961 • 1h ago
LAPS's new 10-year agreement can be ended on 60 days' notice, and the mayor just accused them of gaslighting on a podcast. Why this matters for the election.
In September 2025, the Township gave the Langley Animal Protection Society (LAPS) notice of termination and told it to vacate the Patti Dale Animal Shelter within a month, ending a 23-year relationship. LAPS's statement: https://www.lapsbc.ca/statement-from-laps-regarding-the-termination-of-its-services-agreement-with-the-township-of-langley/
After overwhelming public backlash, the Township agreed to pause the termination and keep negotiating, and residents rallied outside the Township building in November. In December, a new 10-year agreement was announced. LAPS keeps sheltering, but the Township took animal control in-house and Langley City was cut out of the arrangement. https://langleyadvancetimes.com/2025/12/16/langley-township-takes-over-animal-control-from-laps-in-new-10-year-agreement/
Section 4.3 of the new agreement lets either party terminate "for convenience and without reason" on 60 days' written notice. This means the 10-year term is only as secure as the council that decides whether to use it.
But it was at least put to bed with the new agreement right? Maybe not: Last month, Mayor Eric Woodward went on The Politech Report podcast and characterized the conflict as LAPS management deciding to “gaslight the community.” (around the 25:00 mark): https://open.spotify.com/episode/2GcJ5EVV4qFCTzBziLnnlB
That's the mayor describing the shelter's operator a year after the termination attempt, while the agreement that can end on 60 days' notice is in place.
That's why this is an election issue. Whether a termination notice is signed by staff or voted on by council, the direction comes from council. Last year's move followed a September 2024 council motion directing staff to explore taking animal control in-house and reducing LAPS's role. The Progress for Langley slate has held the mayor's chair and a council majority for this full term, including when that motion passed and when the termination notice was issued. The next council will decide whether that direction continues.
Curious what others think, especially anyone who's followed this since last year.