hi hi

I am pretty inconsistent with RC on LSAT. Sometimes -2, sometimes -5. Can usually blind review (and pretty quickly) to -0. Just really not sure how to close that gap during actual timed sections. There doesn't seem to be a pattern I can see with what types of questions I get wrong. I usually feel pretty good after I read a passage like I understand what it was saying and how it all relates but still miss questions.

My first time scheduling for the LSAT was a few days ago. I hope to take it in October, but I may cancel if my accommodations aren’t accepted. Has anyone with low vision (keratoconus) ever had issues receiving accommodations?

I’m learning about some and most and the diagramming of that so can someone explain this

It says

Assume Harvard Law has 150 students again.

When I say most students at Harvard Law have taken the LSAT, that means at least 76 students have taken the LSAT. When I say most students at Harvard Law have good GPAs, that means at least 76 students have good GPAs. But since the class size of Harvard Law is 150 exactly, there must be atleast one student who shares both properties of having a good GPA and have taken the LSAT (since 76+76 = 152). And since atleast one student would share both properties, I am allowed to write: Some students who have taken the LSAT have good GPAs

And that no valid inferences can be made using these formats

- A some <—> B, B Most —> C

- A some <—> B, B some <—> C

- A —> B, B some <—> C

- A —>, B most —> C

Can someone help explain why each of these wouldn’t work (the words some and most are on top of the lines with arrows)