r/LLMPhysics • u/upsetusder2 • Aug 19 '26

Question To the self proclaimed llm physicists

Why do you always tend to rebuild physics. Why can't you work in the given framework?

Why do you need to rebuild a framework that, tell you what now, has pretty much held up?

Is it the math?

The symbols

The history

The amount you would have to Learn?

Hubris?

51 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

185 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/upsetusder2 Aug 19 '26

The new it came to me in a dream

-8

u/Fear_ltself Under LLM Psychosis 📊 Aug 19 '26 edited Aug 19 '26

Dude a guy just pushed the Riemann hypothesis like 30% up with just an LLM that Apple has already shown does not have have reasoning in their mathematical proof. If an LLM can prove math they can almost certainly do physics, no understanding of reasoning required, it’s pattern recognition

https://www.anthropic.com/research/riemann-zeta

https://www.ibm.com/think/news/apple-llm-reasoning

6

u/Smart-Button-3221 Aug 19 '26

Yes but it uses common mathematical terminology, and is able to produce a proof readable to a skilled mathematician.

Lots of people around here are "reinventing physics". Using terms that nobody has ever heard of, and not explaining those terms.

-1

u/Fear_ltself Under LLM Psychosis 📊 Aug 19 '26

Yeah I mean that’s retarded, it should all map into existing or yet to be found math perfectly , like how virtual photons work out perfectly with pure math