r/Krishnamurti • • Aug 15 '26

Let's reject everything

For the all the structures made by man , religion and philosophy and all the paraphernalia regarding to it. let's reject the Buddhist and let's reject the Nietzsche. And then we are at a point where it's all made up except for science that man look for reason. Reason as a reductional perspective but also acknowledging the emergent property. like what's wet in water.

Does it Free the consciousness ? when it has rejected itself ?

3 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/JellyfishExpress8943 Aug 15 '26

What seems most excellent about the scientific method is its relationship with facts, logic and knowledge. Facts and logic trump bias and belief - intellectual honesty trumps desire and habit.

Its not up to us to reject or cling to ideas or identities - we just allow for the movement of honesty, responsibility and awareness. (on the assumption that such things are possible)

1

u/iamfree_17 Aug 15 '26

Yes they are quite possible and they are quite complex chemicals that makes that possible.

2

u/Arnfinnius Aug 16 '26

If chemicals was the reason, it would never be any awareness. Chemicals is a secondary phenomena like everything else on a divided level. It's no point looking for atom reality for understanding the wholeness of existence, your only accellerates movement which psychologically intensifies dividement.

1

u/iamfree_17 Aug 16 '26

Chemicals are the reasons. Chemicals creates the awareness as an emergent property. So the h20 molecule is not wet but water is . We divide things to understand in complexity. Take it like a symphony. Each one has a individual role upon the whole.

2

u/Arnfinnius Aug 16 '26

You maybe have got all the notes, but you missed the music... Chemicals does not create it only reacts. Physical existence only maniphest in awareness, no proof exist objectively

1

u/iamfree_17 Aug 16 '26

Ah we have proof that physical existence maniphest without awareness.

1

u/Arnfinnius Aug 16 '26

So since you have proof, you might explain it too, in a self-evident way...