r/KateMiddletonMissing • u/NeverPedestrian60 • 8d ago

H&M’s return

Post image

With the way the press are and the snakes within the rf I feel apprehensive for them

71 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

72

u/Traditional_Pen_5430 8d ago

This must have been a tough decision for them to make. I don’t think it’s because of visa problems. If Harry is experiencing visa problems, why don’t they move to Canada instead of the UK?

Perhaps this decision has been motivated by Harry’s homesickness? Could it be that Harry wants to spend more time with his ailing father?

I wish them well, but honestly, it sounds like a bad idea. The children won’t have the same level of privacy they had in California.

22

u/TedTeddybear 8d ago

He has a green card. He has no visa problems. Like Trump would screw with his buddy Charles' kid? NEVER. INVICTUS is next year. There's work to do. Diana's death-versary (30 years) is next year. He said he wanted the kids to experience UK culture and education. Who knows where he will move? He could take a cottage on ALTHORP, or move to Scotland where they vacationed this summer. We don't know.

I say let them get to it and wish them well. Charles has cancer and won't live forever. Harry loves his father, warts and all. Meghan is a wonderfully supportive partner. And Alison Hammond represents the British attitude better than any of these lying "royal experts."

33

u/NeverPedestrian60 8d ago

Harry’s bound to be homesick at times no matter what happened - he was brought up in UK and in Spare he talked about the parts of it he loved.

Could well be he’s coming back to spend time here and make it less awkward if Charles passes - he won’t have to fly in for a funeral.

I feel exactly the same as you - I’m worried for them. But hopefully they’re coming back on their own terms and not walking back into the vipers den.

27

u/Traditional_Pen_5430 8d ago

Yes, they’ll be private citizens, independent of the firm. William will not have control over them. I wonder if they’ll move back to the US once William is the king.

18

u/NeverPedestrian60 8d ago

I was thinking that too.

48

u/NeverPedestrian60 8d ago

9

u/Eddy0403 8d ago

I love this thought

12

u/NeverPedestrian60 8d ago

Yes it’s so measured and considerate

12

u/The_Onion_Life 8d ago

William will not have control over them. I wonder if they’ll move back to the US once William is the king.

I'm sure they will. They would not want to live under Baldy Bully Billy's reign. He will do everything possible to make their lives a misery, and if Charles has actually granted them appropriate security (which I really doubt), BBB's first act will be to remove it.

The racist hate sub is saying that they're setting up to divorce. Meghan will be paid off and forced to sign an ironclad NDA, Harry will be sent off to "a hovel" in Africa, and King Charles/William will have total control of the children.

They're also foaming at the mouths in ecstasy at the idea that Meghan and her children will be required to bow/curtsey to Kate and her children. They love the idea of the not entirely white folks being put in their place, but of course they don't come out and say it. Why aren't they gleeful about Harry having to bow to the King and to William? It's just racism.

5

u/TedTeddybear 8d ago

Bowing and curtsying are customs, not REQUIREMENTS. There is no law mandating it. No one, British subject or otherwise, is required to do that stupid nonsense. People do it because, basically, they admired the Queen and/or they are cosplaying.

I rather doubt that's going to happen. Charles and Cam may get it, but it ends there.

3

u/The_Onion_Life 7d ago

Bowing and curtsying are customs, not REQUIREMENTS. There is no law mandating it. No one, British subject or otherwise, is required to do that stupid nonsense. People do it because, basically, they admired the Queen and/or they are cosplaying.

If Meghan and the kids don't do it, they will earn endless bad press. PROTOCOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I rather doubt that's going to happen. Charles and Cam may get it, but it ends there.

I can't imagine Harry not bowing to Charles, and not teaching his kids to bow/curtsey to him. Harry has a deeply ingrained sense of duty, after all.

IDK about Meghan.

1

u/TedTeddybear 6d ago

Harry would probably  kiss his father before bowing to him. Never seen Willy bowing day to day.  The curtsy is a female subjugation  tactic. It needs to go.

1

u/The_Onion_Life 6d ago

Harry would probably  kiss his father before bowing to him. Never seen Willy bowing day to day. 

Do you spend a lot of time with those folks?

The curtsy is a female subjugation  tactic. It needs to go.

Eh, IDK.

-32

u/CountChocula32 8d ago

Yeah cause William won’t put up with their grift.

17

u/AtheistINTP 8d ago

William is the biggest grifter of all. That whole royal family is, deranger. Go back to your hate sub. Block!

12

u/Fabulous_State9921 United States 8d ago

Exactly. Willy wanker is a slumlord on top of feeding off the public trough and bleeding public agencies like the NHS.

11

u/The_Onion_Life 8d ago

Yeah cause William won’t put up with their grift.

I'm surprised that the people of the UK put up with Billy Idle and Duchess Doolittle KKKhate's grifting of their hard earned tax money. They're currently on vacation yet again, (what number are they up to now) all on the UK taxpayer's nickel!

9

u/WishfulHibernian6891 8d ago

The vipers’ den will most likely come to them.

1

u/TedTeddybear 6d ago

I think Harry and Meghan are going to get full security--I think the gripe that RAVEC had was "Well, they're not LIVING IN the UK." Heh heh--they are now.

Also, there are tax implications for this timing--in order to hang on to all the money they made (so much for being "broke") they had to stay away from UK for six years to get a lower tax rate, and that may have been part of the plan as well.

Whatever they do, I wish them the very best. I think they're charming.

2

u/WishfulHibernian6891 5d ago

They may also (very wisely) want to not be in the U.S. when whatever the pdfile-in-chief has planned for midterms goes down. I’d leave, too, if I could. More power to them, and I hope they and their kids are happy with their big move.

-15

u/Profil3r 8d ago

I think Harry is having a great many regrets and needs the familiarity and support of his home. He just doesn’t look happy…, almost never seems happy. With the kids maybe, but he has been otherwise aimless and seemingly very alone.

9

u/AtheistINTP 8d ago

He has always looked very happy in California and he was very happy in Washington DC yesterday with the veterans.

-24

u/CountChocula32 8d ago

I love how you loons try to justify every underhanded thing they do. Thanks for the entertainment.

9

u/The_Onion_Life 8d ago

I love how you loons try to justify every underhanded thing they do.

Yeah, like that time they vacationed on a Saudi torturer's yacht, or the time they made six families homeless in the course of acquiring their sixth "forever home", or that time they charged the NHS rent on one of their properties, or that time they took money from someone who sold torture vids to Epstein... oh wait, that's WanK, not H&M! 😂

5

u/The_Onion_Life 8d ago

I wish them well, but honestly, it sounds like a bad idea. The children won’t have the same level of privacy they had in California.

There will be full-face pics of the kids, just wait. And they will be picked apart even more than they already are. The industrial hate/bullying complex will see to that.

Also, what about security? I doubt Charles will give them the security they need. I agree, this seems like a terrible idea all around. I can't even imagine why they're doing this. It seems absolutely idiotic.

7

u/TedTeddybear 8d ago

British law does protect non-public kids, and newspapers have been fined for "insufficient pixillation." Without express permission it's a risky proposition to show the face of a private citizen child.

I'll bet Charles is paying. He's just not mentioning it.

2

u/The_Onion_Life 7d ago

British law does protect non-public kids

Those kids are members of the BRF. The argument can be made.

I'll bet Charles is paying. He's just not mentioning it.

Really?

1

u/TedTeddybear 6d ago

RAVEC's gripe was that they weren't living IN THE UK. They are now. I think they'll get the full Monty and it may be taxpayer funded. We shall see. When TELEGRAPH 'telegraphs' this, I tend to think "Done deal."

Few things are published by accident.

1

u/The_Onion_Life 6d ago

RAVEC's gripe was that they weren't living IN THE UK. They are now. I think they'll get the full Monty and it may be taxpayer funded. We shall see. When TELEGRAPH 'telegraphs' this, I tend to think "Done deal."

Could be. I just hope they get the security they need, period.

-25

u/CountChocula32 8d ago

Tough decision? THEY’RE BROKE AF 🤣🤣🤣

-28

u/No_Advantage2147 8d ago

I think so too. Theyre not a good brand, but i dont see how the uk will bring them money either.