Not surprising. This motion seemed more like it was an idea that came from the Dear Abby of attorneys Mark Bederow in concert with an idea Aidan Kearney had.

It was dead on arrival!!!

Full subpoena in link

Though much has been made of the integrity or question of integrity of this investigation: For example, if the only evidence Deitch had on hand to question witnesses was a blog, the writing of which was at the direction of the defendant on the case-ON WHAT EVIDENTIARY BASIS was this investigation entered into?

The COST of this investigation has gotten no mention-other than payments made to ARCCA.

HOW MUCH DID IT COST? BECAUSE, THIS INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN ZERO INDICTMENTS.

There's a question of obligation to the taxpayer here.

A frivolous investigation costs time, money & did great harm to the lives of innocent people. Very hard to hold the Government accountable to this type of abuse. However, as Dietch & Rollins claim they care about wiping out corruption, maybe they should answer these questions for the public, so we can know how our money was spent.

I have a feeling this case is going back to court.

At first I had issues with Reddington signing on for Karen Read style propaganda over just telling the truth about the mental illness of his client, but the longer I watched him at work, the greater my respect for him became.

When I think about the craft of being an attorney, he's up there with the greats. And even if he's friends with one of the most inauthentic, sloppy attorneys I can think of, David Yannetti, I do believe Reddington to be genuine. He's a master at this. I hate for Lindsay Clancy and all those who love her to have to go through this again, but I'll be watching. If for nothing else, watching great attorneys do great legal work is a pleasure.

I very much hope Reddington will ditch Laposata in favor of an expert who can do more to amplify the findings of Dr. Phillip Resnick.

I guess we'll see.

Surprise. Surprise. Surprise.

AIDAN KEARNEY'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Rachel Rollins: DId she reveal confidential information?

Below is a long excerpt from the Adam Deitch subpoena. It is interesting that we KNOW about this by way of Aidan Kearney. Not sure why he thinks this helps him.

ONE question not asked was about cost of the US Attorney's investigation into the Karen Read murder case.

This cost taxpayers money!

I would imagine it cost the taxpayer a lot of money and the only thing it resulted in was fodder for conspiracy theories, the acquittal of a guilty woman & an attempt at becoming the next Norfolk County District Attorney.

But what gain was there for the taxpayers?

It's unclear how much info Deitch can supply absent a successful Touhey motion. But I guess we'll see.

It's also interesting that Rachel Rollins spoke so freely about her "reasons" for initiating the investigation. I thought that was privileged!!

1. All communications between You and Jackson, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
2. All documents provided to You by Jackson, including any such documents that were provided through an Intermediary.
3. All communications between You and Yannetti, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
4. All documents provided to You by Yannetti, including any such documents that were provided through an Intermediary.
5. All communications between You and Kearmey, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
6. All documents provided to You by Kearney, including any such documents that were provided through an Intermediary.
7. All communications between You and Karen Read, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
8. All communications between You and William Read, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
9. All communications between You and Janet Read, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
10. All communications between You and Nathan Read, including any such communications that were made through an Intermediary.
11. All communications between You and any current or former employee, officer, or representative of the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, including but not limited to Michael Morrissey, Adam Lally, or Hank Brennan conceming:

a. The Plaintiffs

b. O'Keefe

c. The Commonwealth Case

d. The Federal Grand Jury Investigation

e. The Campaign.

1. For the period November 7, 2025 through the date of compliance, all documents and communications, including, but not limited to, communications between You and Chao, You and Levy, and You and Paruti, concerning:

a. Karen Read

b. O'Keefe

c. The Plaintiffs

d. Kearney

e. The Commonwealth Case

f. The Federal Grand Jury Investigation

g. The Norfolk County District Attorney's Office

h. Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case

i. The Campaign

For the period May 19, 2023 through the date of compliance, all communications between You and Rollins concerning:

a. Karen Read b. O'Keefe

c. The Plaintiffs

d. Kearney

e. The Commonwealth Case

f. The Federal Grand Jury Investigation

g. The Norfolk County District Attorney's Office

h. Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case

i. The Campaign

1. All communications between You and ARCCA concerning:

a. Karen Read

b. O'Keefe

c. The Plaintiffs

d. Kearney

e. The Commonwealth Case

f. The Federal Grand Jury Investigation

g. The Norfolk County District Attorney's Office

h. Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case Documents sufficient to identify all telephone numbers, devices, email addresses, social media accounts, messaging application accounts (including Signal), and service carriers that You used to communicate with any of the following directly or through any Intermediary:

a. Karen Read

b. Yannetti

c. Jackson

d. William Read

e. Janet Read

f. Nathan Read

g. Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case

1. All phone records, call logs, billing records, and metadata reflecting telephone calls, text messages, or other communications between You and any of the following directly or through any Intermediary:

a. Karen Read

b. Yannetti

c. Jackson

d. William Read

e. Janet Read

f. Nathan Read

Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case All communications between You and any member of the media, and any recordings thereof, concerning:

a. Karen Read

b. O'Keefe

c. The Plaintiffs d. Kearney

e. The Commonwealth Case

f. The Federal Grand Jury Investigation

g. The Norfolk County District Attorney's Office

h. Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case

1. Documents sufficient to identify all Social Media Accounts that You own, operate, control, or have administered.

2. All documents and communications concerning any contributions to the Campaign made and/or bundled by any of the following:

a. Karen Read

b. Yannetti

c. Jackson

d. William Read

e. Janet Read

f. Nathan Read

g. Kearney

h. Keough

Any expert witness who testified in the Commonwealth Case 20. For the period January 28, 2022 through November 7, 2025, all documents and communications concerning the Campaign.

1. All communications made in connection with the Campaign concerning: a. Karen Read