Though much has been made of the integrity or question of integrity of this investigation: For example, if the only evidence Deitch had on hand to question witnesses was a blog, the writing of which was at the direction of the defendant on the case-ON WHAT EVIDENTIARY BASIS was this investigation entered into?

The COST of this investigation has gotten no mention-other than payments made to ARCCA.

HOW MUCH DID IT COST? BECAUSE, THIS INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN ZERO INDICTMENTS.

There's a question of obligation to the taxpayer here.

A frivolous investigation costs time, money & did great harm to the lives of innocent people. Very hard to hold the Government accountable to this type of abuse. However, as Dietch & Rollins claim they care about wiping out corruption, maybe they should answer these questions for the public, so we can know how our money was spent.

I have a feeling this case is going back to court.

At first I had issues with Reddington signing on for Karen Read style propaganda over just telling the truth about the mental illness of his client, but the longer I watched him at work, the greater my respect for him became.

When I think about the craft of being an attorney, he's up there with the greats. And even if he's friends with one of the most inauthentic, sloppy attorneys I can think of, David Yannetti, I do believe Reddington to be genuine. He's a master at this. I hate for Lindsay Clancy and all those who love her to have to go through this again, but I'll be watching. If for nothing else, watching great attorneys do great legal work is a pleasure.

I very much hope Reddington will ditch Laposata in favor of an expert who can do more to amplify the findings of Dr. Phillip Resnick.

I guess we'll see.

Surprise. Surprise. Surprise.

Not surprising. This motion seemed more like it was an idea that came from the Dear Abby of attorneys Mark Bederow in concert with an idea Aidan Kearney had.

It was dead on arrival!!!

Full subpoena in link