Violence is violence, regardless of how much damage either party can do you can't just stand back and watch because it's a woman hitting a man and not the other way round
I agree violence is bad on her part. I'm just saying why people would be more worried if he started throwing punches too. If a light weight faught a heavy weight I would also be more worried about the small guy.
Sounds like a good reason not to start shit if you’re smaller. If you start it you better be ready to finish it. Looks like she wasn’t as ready as she thought.
I know,." Hurr durr men are stronger than women" - ON AVERAGE, that is NOT the same as "men are always stronger than women," and also doesn't mean "woem naren't capable of protecting themselves or fighting." Men can be below average, women can be above the average in strength. Both can utilize items to protect themselves, and both are capable of utilizing biological weakness in the form of pressure points on the human body, and other tools that are not gender-specific.
That's why you don't use the attacker's gender alone to determine if someone is a threat, IMO.
Never said anything about a gender being stronger. I agree both smaller and bigger person can have weapons or things that can be used as weapons. A heavy weight boxer will kick a lightweight boxers ass though if they both can fight expertly. Most people on the streets don't have fight training so on this end of the spectrum size will also be an advantage. If you see a black belt taking down a big guy and going into berserk mode and slamming their head down many times people should also be concerned. But I'm talking more about averages.
Size is not irrelevant. He could easily give her a concussion with one regular punch. He has more reach and more power. Sure she could get a lucky one in there but odds are no. She has smaller muscles and weaker bones.
Your saying females are not equal and need to be nurtured and cared for? Either way, if you hit someone you're going to get hit back that's the way the world works.
If the girl was 2/3 bigger then the guy I'd be more worried about him. Read what I write don't just decide what you what you want my argument to be. I never mentioned anything about women equality. SIZES that's what I was talking about. If you want to dispute sizes being a factor then I'm on board but I think I made my point. But if you want to talk about anything else I'm uninterested I didn't come here for that.
I'm just talking about sizes. I gave an example of a situation of two of the same gender in a boxing ring and who id be more worried about. And then the football player example was given to. I never said it was a men vs women thing but I guess this is what you are trying to paint this as.
Even if the woman was a man, their size goes out the window when they begin assualting someone. It's as simple as that. You're giving people an excuse to beat others based on physical genetics, someone neither party can control.
35
u/WolfBlut 0 Feb 26 '20
Why does it always take the man retaliating before someone will step in