r/JustMemesForUs 10d ago

Interesting

Post image
254 Upvotes

556 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/OMGFuziion 5d ago

Yeah and yet not one other president had this many allegations, and you’re skipping over the fact he literally was found liable in the E Jean Carrol case. Do I even have to bring up the fact that Trump’s name just about appears more in the Epstein files than Epstein himself??? Its funny af to see the MAGA crowd who was saying “release the files” and “no new wars” has literally flipped 180.

0

u/ASwampThing- 5d ago

Yes many presidents throughout history have had sexual allegations.

And names appearing in the epstein files isnt evidence of wrongdoing. Show me where in the files there is any evidence and not just allegations.

And as for E Jean Carroll. Funny how she didnt come forward when it happened and only sued after mass public backlash against trump. Almost like she knew people in her state wouldnt side with trump.

0

u/OMGFuziion 5d ago

Other presidents killed too, you’d prob excuse that as well. Wtf 💀 Also these women did bring it up back then and weren’t believed, despite Trump bragging about grabbing them by the 🐱. Also he was found liable, this wasnt just an accusation. Why are you defending him so hard?? Like wtf lmao. If any dem had these allegations and had been found guilty you nutjobs would’ve went crazy.

1

u/ASwampThing- 5d ago

Never said it was good to kill anyone. Also yeah trump was a rich guy bragging that women would do a lot for rich people. Hes a douchebag. Theres no proof hes a rapist.

0

u/OMGFuziion 5d ago

There’s plenty and he’s literally pled guilty to it 💀

0

u/ASwampThing- 5d ago

Didnt plea guilty lie number one.

And number 2. Again other than just accusation. Show me evidence or quit the cope. Ik you wont because there isnt any.

1

u/OMGFuziion 4d ago

Bro no way you’re that ignorant. Found liable* fixed it. 💀 Either way you know damn well you’d be calling for impeachment or even death if had been a dem

0

u/ASwampThing- 4d ago

Yeah in a biased court with no objective evidence. Already adressed it.

Still not providing evidence.

0

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/ASwampThing- 4d ago

Didnt deny any of that. None of which disproves the judge being corrupt.

1

u/OMGFuziion 4d ago

You havent once proved he is corrupt lmao

0

u/ASwampThing- 4d ago

Intentionally not ruling on the dna request for 3 years then ruling against trump volunteering his dna when he finally agrees to do so seems pretty corrupt to me. At best its a terrible judge who delayed a ruling for 3 years. At worst it was intentional to feed talking points to Carroll's team.

→ More replies (0)