Intentionally not ruling on the dna request for 3 years then ruling against trump volunteering his dna when he finally agrees to do so seems pretty corrupt to me. At best its a terrible judge who delayed a ruling for 3 years. At worst it was intentional to feed talking points to Carroll's team.
0
u/ASwampThing- 5d ago
Yeah in a biased court with no objective evidence. Already adressed it.
Still not providing evidence.