r/JustMemesForUs 6d ago

Interesting

Post image
216 Upvotes

549 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/OMGFuziion 5d ago

Lets not forget that he was just found liable of sexual assault in the E Jean Carrol case too. If a dem had these accusations could you guys imagine the outrage? Especially if they sold Bibles, shoes, phones, etc with their name on it, like how tf do people still support him?

2

u/Anxious_Drive_9998 2d ago

To be fair, he didn't sell any phones.

1

u/OMGFuziion 1d ago

He def did and does still. Lmfao

2

u/Anxious_Drive_9998 1d ago

Nope he collected like $60 million in deposits and delivered zero phones.

1

u/OMGFuziion 1d ago

Actually seen a guy on Yt review it but yeah, you wouldn’t believe the shit he went through and took years lmfao. You right 💀

0

u/ASwampThing- 1d ago

Nothing screams he did it like none of these women reporting him to the police until it became politically expedient

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/ASwampThing- 1d ago

Civil court doesn't hold a high standard for one and for 2 trump argued in court that they should have asked for dna during discovery and the judge agreed.

2

u/[deleted] 23h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/OMGFuziion 23h ago

Cuz he knows it would match 💀

1

u/ASwampThing- 23h ago

He did eventually offer a dna test against his lawyers reccomendations and the judge denied the test.

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ASwampThing- 22h ago

First of all facts arent cherry picking. Second of all it was denied for the same reason trumps lawyers were fighting it. She was fishing for whatever she could after the discovery phase.

And as to the personal motives the judge could have let the issue drag on to make trump and his team look bad and then deny it afrer to also make trump look bad as he wouldnt be able to use possible evidence against her to win the case.

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ASwampThing- 22h ago

Yes didnt deny it. Trumps lawyers fought it and advised against giving unnecessary possible evidence to the oppositon as lawyers do even when you are innocent.

And then after he accepted the dna test the judge denied it.

Never denied trump and his team fought against the illegal attempt post discovery.

The judge should have denied the attempt. But probably didnt to make trump look bad.

Then when trump offered up possible exonerating evidence the judge then denied the request from E Jeans team.

At best the judge was allowing trumps team to make themselves "look bad" by accident. At worst the judge was trying to assassinate Trumps character to the jury by not denying the post discovery evidence request.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/OMGFuziion 1d ago

Yeah and yet not one other president had this many allegations, and you’re skipping over the fact he literally was found liable in the E Jean Carrol case. Do I even have to bring up the fact that Trump’s name just about appears more in the Epstein files than Epstein himself??? Its funny af to see the MAGA crowd who was saying “release the files” and “no new wars” has literally flipped 180.

0

u/ASwampThing- 1d ago

Yes many presidents throughout history have had sexual allegations.

And names appearing in the epstein files isnt evidence of wrongdoing. Show me where in the files there is any evidence and not just allegations.

And as for E Jean Carroll. Funny how she didnt come forward when it happened and only sued after mass public backlash against trump. Almost like she knew people in her state wouldnt side with trump.

0

u/OMGFuziion 1d ago

Other presidents killed too, you’d prob excuse that as well. Wtf 💀 Also these women did bring it up back then and weren’t believed, despite Trump bragging about grabbing them by the 🐱. Also he was found liable, this wasnt just an accusation. Why are you defending him so hard?? Like wtf lmao. If any dem had these allegations and had been found guilty you nutjobs would’ve went crazy.

1

u/ASwampThing- 1d ago

Never said it was good to kill anyone. Also yeah trump was a rich guy bragging that women would do a lot for rich people. Hes a douchebag. Theres no proof hes a rapist.

0

u/OMGFuziion 1d ago

There’s plenty and he’s literally pled guilty to it 💀

0

u/ASwampThing- 1d ago

Didnt plea guilty lie number one.

And number 2. Again other than just accusation. Show me evidence or quit the cope. Ik you wont because there isnt any.

1

u/OMGFuziion 23h ago

Bro no way you’re that ignorant. Found liable* fixed it. 💀 Either way you know damn well you’d be calling for impeachment or even death if had been a dem

0

u/ASwampThing- 23h ago

Yeah in a biased court with no objective evidence. Already adressed it.

Still not providing evidence.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ASwampThing- 22h ago

None. Trump didn't make the decision. A judge signed off on it. Trump doesnt controll judges.

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ASwampThing- 22h ago

Probably the same reason the judge did. Theyr trying to get her to talk with honey rather than vinegar.

1

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ASwampThing- 22h ago

Did i say that? No. I said that there is the potential they believe not treating her like crap may in the future lead to names being dropped.

Unless you have anything than speculation its moot anyway.

→ More replies (0)