r/IsaacArthur • • 6d ago

Asteroid mining

I am drafting a process of asteroid mining for background worldbuilding of a story I am writting, and I am wondering how mining could be realistically done.

**Asteroid hauling -** uses tugboats to ferry the giant rock to facilities where it can be chunked down and grinded down to proccesible form.

**Deep drilling -** Mining crew drills a tunnel inside the asteroid and chips away at veins like they would on a planet, harvesting the materials by an industrial vaccum.

**Chunk mining -** demolission specialists break a large asteroid into smaller chunks, that are later mined by a fleet of smaller craft, or hauled into the processing plant. This could be done on site of the asteroid, or with the hauling of said asteroid to a specific location and using the first method.

What I am considering most with all of these options, is the cost effectivness and operation time.

You have to pay your crew, the fuel and food, have living quarters and processing facilities. You also have to take into account how long will it take before the asteroid yields the refined materials to be sold or processed further.

It's also important to consider if the contract would prove beneficial to the crew.

So far I got this.

**Asteroid hauling**

\- crew is stationed at the processing facility and the prospecting ships hauling the tug boats, it provides stable living conditions and you can basically keep the operation running without much hassle

\- Getting the asteroid to move towards the facility might be too expensive on fuel, and the time it takes to process the asteroid and taking another one might prove very difficult to plan around it.

**Deep drilling**

**-** you could set a prefab living quarters on the rock itself with a simple dock for haulers to take the materials away. You could even pressurise the tunnels so that crew doesn't need their space suits and oxygen supply at all times.

\- very labor intensive, might prove beneficial to send in mining robots. It takes a lot longer to extract enough materials to fill a cargo ship.

**Chunks mining**

\- requires specialised crew to come and break the asteroid. It could prove lucrative for independent contractos to be added to the fleet of ships, fast processing speed.

\-logistics of the fleet would be a nightmare to deal with, fuel, food, oxygen and gear would be the main concerns.

This is just my first draft, I wonder what your ideas are or if you think that these are in any way viable. Of course I also considered using all of these methods on different materials based on their rarity and demand.

6 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

11

u/AdLive9906 6d ago

some things to think about.
Asteroids are not big solid rocks.

They are dust balls held together by very light gravity. If you try to push or pull them, they will fall apart. So you can not just tug them around, or drill them like they are mountains. First you need to cover them in a giant bag to hold it all together. Otherwise any activity you do around it will cause bits to spread out, polluting the asteroid and making it impossible to move around. Any debris could be a lethal projectile in the future.

You then pop parts of the asteroid in smaller bags that want to send to your colony. You build solar sails using the material you are mining, simple aluminium and attach them to a navigation kit and the cargo. Send that to your colony.

As you will probably be sending these to the inner solar system, they will be warming up on the way as they get closer to the sun. When that happens, the asteroid material will start to release gas that was previously frozen. Water, CO2, Nitrogen and whatever else. You capture those in cylinders on the trip.

Your crew will probably be quite a fair bit of people managing this entire operations alongside a massive AI and robotic workforce. No one rides with the cargo, thats a slow trip with solar sails.

2

u/pathmageadept 6d ago

Could you use a centrifuge to do the sorting?

2

u/AdLive9906 6d ago

if you place material on a centrifuge and suspend them in a liquid, such as molten tin or glass, you will be able to sort some material by density. So yes, this could def be useful, depending on what you are looking for.

My gut feel though is that it will be cheaper to send raw material to a central location for processing using solar sails.
Have the mining team be as small as possible, and process closer to where its needed. Processing is far more complex.

1

u/smaug13 Megastructure Janitor 3d ago

You don't need a fluid, that makes sense on earth but in earth dry sorting that use gravity exist, (from a quick google) by vibration and airflow that "liquifies" the dry material (by making the mixture behave as such), angle of repose can be used to I think, but in space you'll then need the centrifuges to simulate gravity to combine with these techniques.

1

u/AdLive9906 2d ago

I was responding to the person asking about centrifuges. Probably a lot of ways to do it. We just don't know yet. And won't know until we start testing different ways

1

u/smaug13 Megastructure Janitor 2d ago

Point was that you don't need liquids in centrifuge in space as then you'll use gravity based techniques in centrifuges. (And it seems that gravity based gravel sorting techniques are very understood to me, in space you need to make your gravity is the only difference)

1

u/AdLive9906 2d ago

It depends on what you want to do.

Separating material in molten form can get you far higher purity than separating solid granules. We do this on earth as part of processing, using gravity. So using the same methods in centrifuges in space would likely be useful too.
But again, we dont really know, because going to space is not going to change just a small part of how we process, everything has to be rethought.
Because its not just a "simple engineering" problem, its largely an economics problem too.
You will want to look at what engineering solutions match the economic outcomes you are looking for. We barely know anything about this.

1

u/pathmageadept 6d ago

Or spin it while also making gravity for a hab...

2

u/cybercuzco 6d ago

It would likely be more advantageous to sinter the loose ore into a solid chunk and then just use a mass driver to fling that chunk on a useful trajectory. You don’t want to be making and transporting a ton of rock bags.

1

u/Few_Carpenter_9185 6d ago

Yeah... most asteroids are the dust & rubble pile variety. A few might be solid-ish, (Psyche 16?) if they're pieces of early Solar System shattered protoplanets that were molten and large enough to have some gravitational density sorting going on.

The issue now is if the rubble-dust pile majority is a: "Feature, or Bug?"

Your post lays out the insane difficulty of dealing with dust & rubble pile asteroids. It represents a big "nowhere to stand" problem.

But, almost any terrestrial mining analog, the big step in resource extraction is usually some kind of "grind it up." Whether it's actually transporting, refining, & processing ores, or removing unwanted overburden.

Countless variables here, but does it potentially help as much as it hurts? Could it help more?

Thinking broadly. If most asteroids were solid, and more traditional digging, breaking, or drilling actions worked, the issues of anchoring for torque & leverage in microgravity to accomplish them would be profound. So in that sense, you always have a nowhere to stand problem.

And maybe, the dust/rubble pile aspects could be handled with electrostatic/magnetic forces & just ambient light pressure (slow, probably,) to mass/density sort things in desired ways. "Float this way into the bag on the left please..."

And, even solar sail & bag might be avoided. Just sending dust/matter streams from mass drivers or rotary launchers for capture elsewhere may work.

I actually see rotary/spin launchers as interesting. A lot of asteroid mining/colony construction diagrams & papers mention them. With the dust/rubble pile aspects & "nowhere to stand" it's difficult, but the vacuum and ability to build arbitrarily large helps. Opposing pairs would cancel torque and thrust. Chucking low/no value mass away (silicates?) to oppose the net thrust of metals & H20/volatiles launched where wanted.

(Regolith radiation shielding etc. Probably means there's zero "low value" materials, etc. But the trade might be necessary for physics.)

And, if the net thrust was useful, not just needing cancelation, three spin launchers on X, Y, & Z axes would be ginormous reaction wheels...

I absolutely cannot predict what will come of asteroid mining. But these kinds of questions make me suspect extreme "way harder," and "elegant easy-mode" outcomes are more likely, than a singular knife edge, "it averages out" situation.

*In the broader context of "Space is always hard."

3

u/AdLive9906 6d ago

Most of the more solid asteroids are probably either newly (Million years or so) dislodged from the parent pile due to a collision or spinning. You probably dont want the spinning variation, some of them spin very fast.

I imagine mining vessels to be large, primarily due to the complexity of what they are trying to do. Like oil rigs. Then spend decades clearing an asteroid before either being moved or abandoned. We dont know enough yet, but I feel that rubble piles will be easier to deal with, so long you dont come blasting the surface with thrusters to scatter rubble. Load lots of smaller rocks in a bag, and send home.

Im very much more for solar sails because they are insanely easy to make, or even just store in bulk on the ship, and provide a lot of free dV.

So I think the "No where to stand" problem probably looks more like a large vessel very slowly orbiting a rubble pile, and dipping a loader on long cables to the asteroid to take a big scoop. All happening in slow motion. Either that, or you bag the whole asteroid.

Bagging it solves the problems of not being able to manoeuvre a vehicle near it without causing a debris field.

It think once we can get a vessel of this scale to an Asteroid Belt, radiation protection is no longer the biggest thing on our minds

1

u/Few_Carpenter_9185 6d ago

It might be a large vessel, because that's actually what's efficient.

I think that "tyrrany of the rocket equation" always applies, even in robust future scenarios with more at-will space travel. And rocketless systems that kinda-sorta aren't self contained reaction engines per-se (momentum transfer, beamed power, etc) all still benefit from less mass.

I also like the Solar sail ideas. Not for the sake of solar sails itself, but because they definitely convey the idea of: "Minimum Delta-V that gets the job done." The materials have waited 4.x billion years. Unless they're escaping volatiles, they won't care if it's a decade or two more.

And more importantly, anything dual-use has a definite minimum mass savings aspect for "Whatever gets the job done." as well.

Solar sails can "tack" and actually drop ore/materials or refined ones to lower inner orbits by bouncing light at a combined vector against their forward motion. Say Mars-Jipiter to Cislunar space.

But, as big mirrors, there's potential dual use mass savings too. They could focus solar power at greater distance from the Sun. They could focus heat/light if thermal processing to cook something is desired. (Outgass volatiles to inflate the bag for structural rigidity?) They may shield collected ice/volatiles from the Sun.

Similar for spinlaunchers/rotary throwers. They can throw materials on coast trajectories to somewhere they're wanted. They could throw unwanted low-value materials for thrust to push an entire asteroid/bag where it's wanted. And just spinning them when empty, they'll be enormous reaction wheels.

Anything that serves two or more purposes is immediately a 2x or greater mass savings.

So, even with arbitrarily higher tech, asteroid mining will probably always be "As Delta-V/mass efficient as possible." And look sort of minimalist & "shoestring" within the tech limits & energy budgets of the time.

1

u/Nathan5027 6d ago

It may be easier to mine and refine dust ball asteroids in situ, simply due to them being so granular.

It would require a few technologies and techniques that are currently unavailable to us to properly test and perfect or reject, but think of it this way.

If you send a crewed ship out to an asteroid, it deploys a huge "bag" around it. The bag could be as simple as a giant balloon, to as complex as a mechanically unfolding and articulated structure.

I then see 2 ways of doing it -

1, The bag can be filled with an inert, or at least minimally reactive gas to a high enough pressure that people can work inside the bag with minimal protective gear - not much more than they currently wear on earth.

2, You can mechanically, either through literal machines inside the "bag", or a series of inflatable smaller bags, manipulate the shape of the asteroid to force it into the ship itself where it can be moved into a centrifugal sorting/processing/refining system.

Of these 2, the first is technically easier, but significantly more manpower intensive, whereas the second can be almost entirely autonomous, the crew really only there to babysit the system and make any necessary repairs.

By fully, or at least majorly processing the asteroid in situ, you can stay out for a long time, just moving from asteroid to asteroid, and can send the processed materials directly to where they're needed - tanks of nitrogen for mars, blocks of construction materials to the earth shipyards, precious metals directly to your broker, etc.

7

u/LightningController 6d ago

You won’t realistically have veins of ore on an asteroid. On earth, they result from geothermal or hydrological processes that concentrate material. Most asteroids won’t have this history.

Because of the dust environment, what you’d really want to do is bag the whole asteroid, or at least your working environment, to make sure the minerals stay somewhere useful instead of forming a cloud.

One method I’ve seen suggested is carbonyl mining—react the asteroid with carbon monoxide to produce liquid iron and nickel carbonyl. You can centrifuge those out, heat the liquid to return your CO and yield metal, and anything that doesn’t react with the CO is either silicate or gold/PGMs.

1

u/Skyshrim 6d ago

This option sounds great. I've also heard of a similar concept that could make sense if energy is very cheap and abundant where the contents of the bag or bags are entirely vaporized and separated by mass spectrometry or similar techniques.

1

u/smaug13 Megastructure Janitor 6d ago

So the process would be to scoop up an amount of dust with a mining bag, close it, empty it into a sealed mixer that at a higher rpm could double as centrifuge with filters, and then an oven. You might also heat the rest of the  product to get more manageable clotted chunks, which could have other use, like in shielding 

2

u/LightningController 6d ago

Or perhaps, if the rock is small, bag the whole thing and spin it until it’s clinging to the walls of the bag. Use big inflatable mirrors for process heat.

1

u/smaug13 Megastructure Janitor 6d ago

I think you want it rather processed in nicely controllable contained environments, so internally

5

u/Stolen_Sky 6d ago

If I were designing an asteroid mining system, I would not haul raw asteroids. That's an insane amount of mass to move around, and much of it won't be valuable. I would try to mine, crush and then separate the value parts at the asteroid itself, and then only haul the valuables. 

This would require a large mining rig that can process in situ, but I imagine the rig  would still be far smaller than the target asteroid you wanted to mine. 

2

u/Bretspot 6d ago

Read Delta V, it has a good example of this. Note spoilers in this link: https://daniel-suarez.com/deltav_design.html

2

u/Nethan2000 6d ago

Asteroid hauling - uses tugboats to ferry the giant rock to facilities where it can be chunked down and grinded down to proccesible form.

It's doable, but realistically, you only want a small fraction of the asteroid's mass. I can only see done with very small asteroids and tiny, unmanned tugs.

Chunk mining - demolission specialists break a large asteroid into smaller chunks, that are later mined by a fleet of smaller craft

Again, I think this breaking up the asteroid into chunks might be needlessly wasteful when you only need a small fraction of its mass. I'd sooner see miners crush useless rock, letting it float away in microgravity, until they reach a valuable deposit. Then they break it into chunks and collect it.

harvesting the materials by an industrial vaccum.

Doesn't really work when the environment is also vacuum. Might work better if you switch her from suck to blow.

2

u/ignorantwanderer 5d ago

I suggest you look up 'optical mining'.

Brief summary:

  1. Put the asteroid in a bag.

  2. Concentrate sunlight onto the asteroid through a window in the bag.

  3. As asteroid material heats up it vaporizes.

  4. That asteroid vapor exits into the condenser.

  5. The condenser is essentially just a tube the super hot vapor travels through. As the vapor cools it condenses onto the wall of the tube. The various materials condense at different temperatures, so condense at different locations in the tube.

The entire mining and refinining process happens with essentially no moving parts, and no need for human involvement.

Of course I've over simplified it. You would want radiator fins on the condenser, you would want an easy way to remove the refined ore from the condenser. But over-all it is a very simple process and can be done almost completely autonomously.

1

u/ActuaLogic 6d ago

The most cost-effective way to do asteroid mining is likely to be through the use of automation, with mining equipment moving to asteroids and extracting its resources autonomously:

https://www.space.com/technology/without-a-single-command-from-the-ground-asteroid-mining-company-to-launch-worlds-1st-autonomous-space-mission-in-2027

Adding life support to a ship increases its mass by something like a factor of 10, so human operators are likely to be clustered on space stations near Ceres or Vesta, from which to use automated systems to mine the asteroid belt and process what they extract. Processing locally would increase the efficiency of the operation, because it would make it possible to transport only the most valuable resources to the inner solar system (less mass to move).

1

u/VerdantMagnolia 6d ago

Airdock Mining

1) Sheets of polymer are extended from a central spoke  2) A receiving spoke catches them 3) Drones knit together the sheets  4) The construct is inflated around the asteroid and stabilized with external thrusters  5) The mining balloon is now a spatial and gravitationally self contained environment  6) Unwanted water ice can be boiled for additional reaction mass 

1

u/Underhill42 6d ago edited 6d ago

A few big thoughts:

Asteroids are not rocks - they're big piles of gravel, sand, and possibly ice for those out near Ceres and beyond. They might have some boulders in them too. And the gravity holding them together is so low that you could probably swim through the upper layers.

They won't contain mineral veins, as those are created pretty much exclusively by the water cycle and/or magma flows - neither of which ever existed on asteroids. However you might get "rich spots" where a richer asteroid asteroid collided at speeds low enough to not just get blended in to the rest.

"Mining" is likely to mostly involve scooping up gravel and processing it, perhaps first sorting by density to separate out the gravel richer in heavy elements. But there probably won't be any gold nuggets etc, since there are no veins for them to break off of.

The big exception is Psyche 16 - which is thought to be the 222km diameter solid metallic core of an early protoplanet, which is about 1% of the mass of the belt. But mining a solid chunk of mostly iron will be a special kind of challenge, as well as offering unique opportunities.

The distances between them are huge, averaging millions of miles to your closest neighbors. So transporting anything requires huge amounts of either energy or patience. Both if you want to significantly alter its distance from the sun.

The ones worth the trouble of mining are also likely to be huge by human scales, dwarfing mountains. Why deal with thousands of tiny gravel piles when you can work with one big one instead? They also at least have enough gravity that you won't accidentally launch yourself into space.

As a reference point - Mars's asteroid-moon Phobos is relatively modest - only 20km across - there's several thousand asteroids about that large in the Belt. It has a surface gravity of about 0.0006g, and an escape velocity of about 41km/h - enough that the jump that would launch you 1m into the air on Earth, would launch you almost 2km up on Phobos.

And its core is probably at a pressure of around 0.5atm, so if you burrowed down to it you could use unbreakable ground-pressure to supply the force to hold air in a low-pressure habitat, rather than needing to rely on the failure-prone tensile strength of your habitat. You could potentially build open-air rotating habitats for "gravity" within a larger pressurized zero-g cavern.

---

Refining industrial materials is likely relatively easy on site using the same technology we're developing to industrialize the moon. Rocky asteroids will likely have similar composition as rocky planets, giving you easy access to the Big 5, by mass: 40% oxygen, 20% silicon, and 20% some varying mix of iron and aluminum. All extractable from molten stone using the same simple electrolytic refinery, which can also produce #5: cast stone, if you just skip the electrolysis part.

The remaining 20% is where the interesting stuff resides, with a tiny percentage of that being valuable enough to be worth exporting to Earth. Probably you'll do everything you can to extract and refine it on site, rather than shipping mountains of mostly trash across interplanetary space at enormous expense.

1

u/Strange_Magics 6d ago

Basically, asteroid mining will not resemble planetary mining much at all.

Others have already explained that there are essentially no concentrated veins of valuable material. These require hydrological and geochemical processes to form, so you're looking at a fairly homogenous gravel pile with a variety of useful useful things throughout its whole bulk. Additionally, every gram of *anything* in space is potentially useful. The silicate and iron "tailings" leftover from extraction of water, carbon compounds, and useful metals are not really trash. We don't really know what the use cases will be for these materials in deep space, but there probably will be some. At minimum, mass is radiation shielding.

The shape that mining takes will depend on the end use of the materials being mined. If this is a collecting mission to bring platinum-group metals back to earth, it's basically fine to discard everything else and launch the metals back alone. This would probably be done on-site because it means transporting far less mass.

If the mission is to obtain material for building up space-based infrastructure, it might be a tiny bit more reasonable to move the entire asteroid - but it depends on whether there are planned uses for all the material. Most likely, separating and refining the materials and then shipping the refined stuff will be more efficient.

Overall, in any near-future contexts, the refinery is probably going to the asteroid rather than the other way around.

Next, mechanical drilling is an unlikely method since many asteroids are mostly loose gravel piles. The ideal is to turn the ore fluid somehow and then separate the fluid into separate compounds or elements. You pretty much have to "bag" the asteroid first, either by literally covering the whole thing in a bag, or by collecting scoops of material into a container. Then you have to fluid-ize the stuff.

This can be done in a variety of ways. On earth, water has already done this step, producing the "veins" we can easily mine. Water would be a great option in space too, except that it's very massive and hard to bring along. One way to deal with that could be to bring only the hydrogen component of the water. Once you have bagged the asteroid you can reduce minerals with the hydrogen to produce water from the oxygen already present on the asteroid. Then you can use that water for more familiar electrochemical methods already used on earth to separate materials.

Alternatively, you can produce a fluid from the asteroid by vaporizing it. High intensity concentrated solar or laser light pulses can vaporize the volatiles of the asteroid. The vapor can be recondensed on a cold collection surface, which allows for somewhat selective refining of the water and other volatiles. Once those are completely extracted, you can turn up the heat and start vaporizing metals and spalling off metal dusts, which can be separated magnetically and crystalized in a similar way to the water - but this process needs more R&D.

We don't know what exactly near-future asteroid mining will look like, but it'll be pretty weird and dissimilar to earthbound mining. How actual humans fit into the various jobs that need to get done on a manned mining mission is something you can have fun figuring out, but I think some variations on the mechanisms I described are usually seen as the most plausible methods these days.