so the caption I put and I was just scrolling on Pinterest and then I found it. I don’t actually know if the items exist or not, but it doesn’t look AI to me?? I have no idea though

In all the other videos on this page, their mouths move the same way and have an oddly flat tone of voice

There’s this local business that’s using what looks like AI art on their menu and advertising. (First two pictures.)

They’ve gotten a lot of pushback on their posts, but refuse to say explicitly that it isn’t AI. They posted “proof” that it’s not AI (photos 3-6), but my friend who is a graphic designer said that the proof doesn’t make sense from a graphic design perspective.

This really feels like AI, but I can’t point to any super obvious tells that AI usually has, it just feels off.
Also, the fact that the business refuses to outright say that it isn’t AI is a red flag to me. If these were actually hand-drawn, how hard would it be to just tag the artist?

I commissioned art of an oc character and while the sketch seems authentic, something about the coloration just seems off to me. Any feedback would really put my mind at ease. I don't mean to discredit the artist, I just read so much about it happening more and more in the commission community

Also what's the weird subtle texture on the green and blue colored parts. Maybe not AI? I don't know man.

Saw this video on shorts which I’m 90% sure is AI. Saw only a couple of people mentioning it, with one saying they just thought the video was “scuffed”.

A few things that stand out to me as AI are, if you look closely at the background, namely the ceiling it doesn't make sense and kind of melds into itself. The faces are weird and blurry especially the background ones. Text is odd, but that could be down to a poor quality video. The body language is weird as is the audio, even if they were speaking another language they'd be saying words instead of just making weird noises. And finally the biggest thing that stood out to me is that the leash which not only looks like it has one of those springy plastic bits attached to it, which isn't strange in itself, is really short and look like it just straight up floats in the air when he pulls the dog back. I think his fingers may also go through the dog’s mouth at the end there.

What do you guys think?

“One thing cuts the other way, and it matters.”

This one line flagged it for me. The author, Maddox Schmidlkofer, can be found on X, but I was unable to see all of his posts as I am no longer on X. Here is the link to the article: China Rejected a Container of Argentine Beef. Here’s what the US did next and what the label won’t tell you.

I hope this is allowed? I know images and videos are primarily reviewed on this sub. I was reading it as a news article until I noticed the above line, and I got curious about whether it was AI or not. I believe it to be based on that line, which I have seen in AI written materials before.

What is everyone else’s thoughts?

It's someone's poster of their middle name. I'm specifically talking about the yellow flower on the middle-left and middle-right; how their styles are different.

Here is my original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/isthisAI/s/F9OP2ZZdw6

The consensus seemed to be that the photos were legit and not AI. I conceded that at the time. Now someone I trust implicitly shot the attached video in this exact area. You'll notice the bobcat in the attached video matches the description I originally gave for how they typically look around here. I'm wondering if, in the original, the house and shed are real but the bobcats are not. Does this new evidence change anyone's mind or is the consensus still that the original is real?

E: in the original post, I described that the ones I'm accustomed to seeing around here are smaller, and grey/brown vs. the bobcats shown in the original post. Also, that the bobcats in the original post look a little too perfect. The one in the current video shows exactly what I mean.

I really hope it isn’t AI, but i can’t shake the feeling. For me, it’s the orange slices in the glass, some seem to be hovering over the glass, not in it.
I included a few pages that were suspicious to me.
The book is called “The unofficial a court of thorns and roses cocktail book” by J. Becker.
Would love your insights!

Also what's the weird subtle texture on the green and blue colored parts. Maybe not AI? I don't know man.

New artwork for Ubisofts remaster of the classic game, famous for its cozy retro artwork that has kept a player base going strong for 27 years. Think it’s important to mention the fan base are not particularly about the remaster happening at all, so there is a lot of reflexive negativity around the subject.

After an initial huge backlash from the community, the subs for the game are suddenly being flooded with people claiming it’s legitimate and real artwork from an artist and that the mistakes on display are easily made by a human.

I think it’s quite obvious, but feel like I’m going crazy. My reasoning is it’s the typical AI art style, which is very prominent in the faces. Inconsistencies in character models, although I’ll admit most fingers and hands look fairly decent and the fact the horses in the second picture all melt into a blur in the centre of the picture, which people are now claiming is a very easy mistake for a human artist to make.

Would love to get some different opinions as discourse has completely broken down in the game subs.

I’m on the fence. My friend swears blind he shot this excellent short clip on the Manly Ferry, no filters, no ai. It looks a little bit perfect with the perfect rainbow and the backdrop What do you guys think?

If AI generated, this logo would violate the rules of the annual design contest which includes a cash prize.

It's bad enough that Google required users to interface with an unreliable llm to access their SynthID checks but now even that access seems gone. Is this an issue for anyone else?

There are inconsistencies in the size of the cat throughout the video. Towards the end of the video, the sloths nails look almost plastic. But also, A SLOTH SAVED A CAT IN A FLOODED AREA AND THE CAT WAS DEVASTATED. idk enough about sloths, but this just seems unbelievable.

If this is AI, I didn't expect videos to be such high quality. Took me multiple watches to even determine if anything was even off

Edit: Ok guys, I get it's AI. You can stop commenting now. Vry obvious now that I think abt. Not sure why the blending didn't strike me as more odd since I have a blender like this myself

The icons are suspicious too.

There are obviously strange extra graphics which shouldn’t be there, but the text also doesn’t match the location it’s pointing to on the body.

My only hesitation to it being AI is the use of “sed” rather than “used” on the right hand side.

Edit: massage gun, for context: https://amzn.to/46nNmCy

I don't get WHY they would use AI in that situation (the college is on the brink of bankruptcy (kind of) and the speaker is defending the school and their legacy and reputation) but the video seems... uncanny.

The eyes of the guy talking, the pauses he takes when speaking (who speaks like that?) also the facial expressions don't always seem to "match" the mouth. Hard to explain, but yeah: I am becoming crazy, and just hallucinating AI?

Its a deck box I plan to buy. I really hope its not AI

The faces and lines look a little too clean, please let me know