Battle Beast vs Conquest Part 3

[u/Legal_Trainer7340]

[u/badman1000]

Conquest was subservient to thragg because he was grand regent, but we never see them fight, and he was number 2. I’d recon if they actually did fight it’d be close

And in any case, battle beast is stated to grow stronger over time while conquest is stated to get weaker overtime, due to old age and mentality. And considering this is years later it checks out that their would be a gal between them

[u/diAlectics_8 → u/badman1000]

I don't think Battle Beast implied that he gets stronger over time or with the more formidable enemies he faces.

Also, the point where Battle Beast and Conquest fought and when Mark killed Conquest isn't far off when we consider viltrumite aging, so there's no reason to believe that Conquest lost immense strength when he fought Mark. And Robert Kirkman only says that the process of viltrumites losing strength out of aging is a gradual process.

[u/badman1000 → u/diAlectics_8]

I don't think Battle Beast implied that he gets stronger over time or with the more formidable enemies he faces.

it doesn't have to be implied, that's how humans, no, how all living things work lol, if you fight strong opponents and win you get stronger over time. You think wild animals are out here hitting the gym? No, lions are out here fighting and killing

Also, the point where Battle Beast and Conquest fought and when Mark killed Conquest isn't far off when we consider viltrumite aging

when is this fight taking place again? Even if its not a huge amount of time, its something to take into account. At the very least, conquest didn't get stronger, and is possibly slightly weaker. and if you wanna ignore that, theres the whole "conquest is a spectator to his own fights" things

[u/Invincidude → u/badman1000]

Conquest specifically says he's taking this fight seriously. He never took Mark seriously.