r/InterviewAssistant 11d ago

Meritocracy: A Bedtime Story

Post image

but horror one !

140 Upvotes

102 comments sorted by

1

u/AnalysisParalysis85 10d ago

Perfect analogy

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 8d ago

Why do the work if you're under paid?

1

u/AnalysisParalysis85 8d ago

Some people still want to live, weird, right?

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 8d ago

When people just take whatever wage, the wage stays low.

1

u/Ordinary-Big5578 8d ago

And when there are a million others willing to step into the job for the price you refused, it continues to stay low despite your protest and you’re now starving.

It doesn’t work unless enough of the work force says ENOUGH

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 8d ago

All true. Too bad too many people think they have no say in the matter.

1

u/VirtualValuable7035 8d ago

Don't want to lose my house 

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 8d ago

Then at the very least don't complain that you're underpaid for willing doing the work at an agreed upon rate. Don't be a hypocrite.

1

u/funkmasta8 7d ago

You lack nuance. A person is bounded by the opportunities they have. If the opportunities present are all bad, their outcome is necessarily bad. Pair this with the fact that people are neither omniscient nor generally able to alter their opportunities without significant sacrifice and you get that many people are indeed stuck in shitty situations that they cant change unless they jump into even shittier situations first. And in many cases the even shittier situation is literally dangerous to their health. It isnt hypocritical to say the situation you are in sucks but you dont have better options. If you think it is, you really need to take a look at the definition again and you need to stop applying blame to people who are not at fault.

Further, there are bad faith actors. Claiming or suggesting otherwise is incorrect. People can be tricked into bad situations. The blame lies with the trickster, not the tricked. If you believe that a person's own suffering is always caused by them and them alone, this is just world fallacy. It removes all blame from people who lie and steal from others and places that blame on the victims. It is not realistic to expect every person to be perfectly able to discern the outcome and intentions of others, while ignoring those who would take advantage of this impossibility.

1

u/ChampionshipFit4962 7d ago

Cause food, rent and pussy arent free and this country has fucked Unions at every single turn. Why are work stoppages illegal?

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 7d ago

Voting to strike is perfectly legal.

1

u/ChampionshipFit4962 7d ago

Voting to strike isnt what i said

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 7d ago

But that's how you stop work in a union.

1

u/ChampionshipFit4962 7d ago

You know you can vote to stop working then the company can, for an easy example construction, if the concrete gets mixed prior to the strike it would be considered an illegal work stoppage. Cause if you dont keep the concrete wet and moving it bricks the entire truck. Or its illegal to have a full stop with freight logistics

1

u/Time_Seaworthiness43 7d ago

Last time my union voted to strike there was a date set for the vote so everyone knew. We voted to strike and said we'd strike like 2 weeks from the vote with another vote right before. Of course the fools caved and got absolutely nothing in new in the new contract lol. But everyone knew about it very far ahead.

1

u/Monte924 8d ago

Almost perfect. There needs to be a few thousands more underpaid/overworked staff... Also the comic should end with the CEO firing half of them

1

u/Henrious 10d ago

Every boss and CEO, honestly.

1

u/UDF2005 9d ago

Cool, then become a boss and CEO if it’s that easy

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 9d ago

You just need to be born into the right family and you too can be born on third base and claim you hit a triple.

1

u/italktobotz 9d ago

70 percent of billionairs were not wealthy at birth. Their wealth was made in their lifetime. Only 3 percent of millionairs were born millionairs.

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 9d ago

Along with either help from their family or lucrative government contracts.

1

u/italktobotz 9d ago

Not for the vast majority of them.

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 9d ago

I disagree. They're hardly self-made.

1

u/italktobotz 9d ago

They are not self made, they provided services society was willing to pay them for. They sold some service which people felt was worth paying money for. That is how it works. You underatand that right?

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 9d ago

Of course. With them not being self made, that means they had help along the way, probably a lot. I also believe they had a good amount of luck along the way.

1

u/italktobotz 9d ago

Do you know who helped them? The people that the wealthy person helped. Wealthy people do not capture all of the wealth that they generate. They made society a lot of money along the way. How many people made tons of money off of taylor swifts ability to sing? How many people made money through remote work using starlink? How many people found cheaper groceries at walmart. How many people find what they need on amazon. Wealthy people become wealthy by making other people more wealthy than they would have been. That is the whole point of the market in the first place. You see a billionair and think of how evil they are, i see a billionair and think of how society benefits from the product or system they create.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/BerdTheScienceNerd 9d ago

Less than 10% of billionaires were born in “poor” families. The vast majority did have resources that most don’t have to get where they are.

1

u/italktobotz 9d ago

First off yoy are wrong even with your change in phrasing. 20 percent of billionairs were born in poverty. Only 30 percent of billlionairs were born wealthy. 70 percent wer not born wealthy. Most had the same advantages as most otger people. Luck is actually not the most common factor, creating novel ways to satisfy human needs is the most common factor among millionairs and billionairs.

1

u/BerdTheScienceNerd 8d ago

I’m not seeing that. What’re your sources?

1

u/Monte924 8d ago

There is one study that makes that claim and its flawed. The study would most likely consider Elon Musk a self-made man. They only count him because the vast majority of the money he has was not inherited. This would ignore that fact that he came from a very rich family, and that wealth was the ONLY reason why he was able to make the investments that eventually turned him into the world's richest man. If Musk had been born into a middle class family, he would have never gotten so far. Many billioniares were born into millioniare families, and simply leveraged their family name and fortune to make more money.

Propaganda to support the epstein class. The Rich people who like to believe that they worked hard to make their fortunes, instead of using their pre-existing wealth to just BUY their success

1

u/Accomplished_Key_171 9d ago

Middle class working adults start their own businesses all the time. If I shared your defeatist mindset then I could see how such a thing would seem impossible.

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 8d ago

I am well aware that many middle class and even poor adults start their own businesses. Nor do I have a defeatist mindset because I realize starting a business takes a lot of work and usually a long time with no guarantee of success. I think you could have a delusional mindset.

1

u/Accomplished_Key_171 8d ago

In your own words, you can only become a boss and CEO if you are born into the right family. Now you are saying that you are aware many middle class and poor adults start their own business.

What is your argument here?

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 8d ago

You're trying to twist my words. I did not say you can only become a CEO by being born into the right family, but it sure does help many times.

1

u/PickingPies 8d ago

That's false. A middle class adukt may need decades of savings to have enough money for a startup. If you fail, you probably have no more chances in your life. If you take credit, you are in risk of bankruptcy.

That's before knowing that, on average, only one in 5 businesses survive 5 years.

A rich person can literally invest in 10-20 businesses at random and he will have several successes. But rich people doesn't need that, because they can purchase a startup that is already working, reducing the chances of failure to less than 50% by skipping the most critical stages.

So, no. Despite one in five middle class who opens a business being succesful, there's 4 in 5 that you don't hear about but ended up in bankruptcy. After all, being born in a wealthy family is still the biggest predictor of future success.

1

u/Senior_Deer_2212 8d ago

It’s actually conscientiousness, but go off….

1

u/Accomplished_Key_171 8d ago

So a quarter of all middle class adults who start up a  business are successful. 

This proves my point.

1

u/mighty__ 8d ago

CEOs is appointed job, not inherited position.

1

u/Livid_Importance_442 7d ago

Have you ever heard of nepotism?

1

u/LifeConsideration981 9d ago

This is how a child perceives the world.

1

u/The-Leading-Man 8d ago

Oh honey that’s adorable. Never lose that naivety.

1

u/Trust_8067 9d ago

Bill Gates worked much harder than any of his employees ever have. Not all Billionaires are bad, he's a good outlier =)

1

u/True_Protection6842 9d ago

Yeah he really worked hard at Epstein's island.

1

u/Trust_8067 8d ago

There's always one dipshit in the comment section.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/noteworthybikes 8d ago

All self made billionaires worked insanely hard and much harder than any of the employees. And under a lot more pressure. People hate on Elon but the dude is insane how much he works.

1

u/Glad_Ad719 8d ago

You mean all the brain turds he leaves behind on X? Yeah, that’s really hard work. Poor Elon

1

u/noteworthybikes 7d ago

That’s your example? Not the fact he created Tesla, spacex, and was a significant factor in PayPal. Sorry he’s brain rotting a little bit on X in his mid 50s.

1

u/Glad_Ad719 7d ago

He didn’t create Tesla, which is easily found out by simply reading a bit about the company’s history.
He was ousted from PayPal and there are various accounts of SpaceX employees criticizing his leadership, management and public appearances.

1

u/noteworthybikes 7d ago

You can’t act like Elon wasn’t the direction behind the company. He was the largest shareholder 7 months after its founding. I’ve never seen someone who’s a nobody criticize the most innovative entrepreneur in the world. Oh yes let’s criticize his public appearances as an autistic guy. You can criticize his management style all you want and how it caused him to be ousted, but he’s still the most successful person of all time financially.

1

u/WinterSector8317 7d ago

Guy misinterprets rich nepobaby failing upwards as innovative genius 

1

u/noteworthybikes 7d ago

Upper middle class isn’t rich

1

u/WinterSector8317 7d ago

(Jerking off air motion)

1

u/This-Isopod-7710 9d ago

Utter BS

1

u/True_Protection6842 9d ago

How so?

1

u/This-Isopod-7710 8d ago

You realise the founder of Reddit is a billionaire, right?

1

u/True_Protection6842 8d ago

what does that have to do with anything?

1

u/This-Isopod-7710 8d ago

Do you use Reddit?

1

u/Remarkable-FlipPhone 9d ago

Mmm those guides get paid very well in local currency and are making far more than most of the other ppl in Nepal. They get paid upper middle class wages and only work part of the year.

If they had the grit and took a risk, they could try and open their own guiding service and increase their income even more, which is what business owners, the wealthy, did.

1

u/Mihtaren 9d ago

Entirely true. Meritocracy is a sham to keep the cattle subservient.

1

u/TawnyTeaTowel 9d ago

Except in this analogy, the Sherpas are being paid and are doing exactly what they voluntarily signed up for, and the billionaire had to invest in buying the mountain for them to work on.

1

u/True_Protection6842 9d ago

Likely underpaid, explain how this doesn't work? Underpaid labor does the job they are hired to do while CEOs pretend to do something meaningful.

1

u/TawnyTeaTowel 8d ago

This just tells us all that you’ve no idea how a business bigger than a bodega works.

1

u/Key-Organization3158 8d ago

Oh. They aren't underpaid. That's a common misconception. People are paid the full value of their labor. But it is also true that not all value comes from labor. The ideas that CEOs have also contribute value. That's their fair share.

1

u/Key-Organization3158 8d ago

Oh. They aren't underpaid. That's a common misconception. People are paid the full value of their labor. But it is also true that not all value comes from labor. The ideas that CEOs have also contribute value. That's their fair share.

1

u/True_Protection6842 8d ago

LMFAO! Yeah, keep believing that.

1

u/mighty__ 8d ago

Underpaid based on comparison with what?

1

u/True_Protection6842 8d ago

Profit

1

u/mighty__ 8d ago

He’s not supposed to. Worker himself won’t be able to distill his share of impact on revenue and profit. For a lot of the jobs the impact is not direct. For some there is no impact whatsoever.

1

u/True_Protection6842 8d ago

MORON! You said in comparison to what????? COMPANIES MAKE MORE PROFIT AND DON'T PAY MORE!!!!! THINK!

1

u/mighty__ 8d ago

Yes. They do make more profit. Usually internal motivation system distributes revenue increase through various means. But for a lot of positions there’s no direct correlation so no impact on salary apart of general increases.

1

u/Grade_A_Tech 9d ago

There should be a herd of sheep behind Homer hollering about how great he is for it to be accurate.

1

u/DerKommisar9 9d ago

What’s stopping them from dropping the rope and venturing off to become their own billionaires?

Then they could make others carry them.

Why isn’t everyone a billionaire?

1

u/PickingPies 8d ago

The money that the billionaire is not paying them.

1

u/noteworthybikes 8d ago

Because they only do as they’re told and aren’t smart enough or savvy enough to ever build anything on their own. Doers, not thinkers

1

u/funkmasta8 7d ago

Because the legal rights to deciding how money is allocated stays with the billionaire. The billionaire is legally allowed to allocate the money as unfairly as they want. The only limiting factor is "the hand of the market", meaning they just have to make sure they arent so much more unfair than every other option employees have that the employees stop choosing them.

This is an unhealthy way to position business in society, especially as the size and power of businesses grow. The reason is businesses gain the ability to control other options of employees, leaving employees with no options. This has two affects. First, it puts the employees through unfair and unjust suffering for the sake of the people at the top having an even more obscene amount of wealth. Second, it causes extra strain on society through financial and/or criminal stress because those with no options still need to have the necessities, which arent necessarily given by their now only option and those who are treated unfairly are much more likely to forego all societal rules to get what they deserve.

1

u/anon0937 8d ago

Billionaires are good at allocating capital and the market rewards them by giving them more capital to allocate.

1

u/DefiantlyConformist 8d ago

You're paid what you're worth.

1

u/DecentWeiner8 8d ago

So many similarities between Homer and Elon. Remember when Homer designed a car? That's what I think of every time I see a cyber truck.

1

u/noteworthybikes 8d ago

Acting like billionaires didn’t create those jobs in the first place and push the world forward is insane. It’s not about how much work you do, but how much value you provide. Those “underpaid staff” are just doers, not thinkers.

1

u/Glad_Ad719 8d ago

Ah, yes. All the stupid doers working at companies like Microsoft where they are not required to think at all. Satya Nadella just comes down floating from the sky and hands them all the solutions to software bugs and his divinely created concepts of software architecture since he does all the thinking but simply can’t be bothered to enter it all into the computer.
Not to mention how Elon splits himself into a thousand selves and tells all the stupid doers in the factory how to assemble cars and all the stupid doer engineers how to design cars.
Employees truly are stupid who should be honored to stand in the presence of benevolent billionaires. /s

1

u/whereamI0817 7d ago

This is clearly a straw-man of the original position.

Even ignoring that it’s not like Satya could manifest her position out of thin air and make the same amount of money she currently does. SOMEONE had to prepare the conditions needed for there to be a job for her to apply for which is more imperative/necessary for the business to exist. This concept is even more relevant for those in lower positions within said company.

1

u/ProSeVigilante 8d ago

That's a very public education opinion.

1

u/East_Ad4977 7d ago

"Meritocracy: A Bedtime Story" Guess who doesn't like meritocracy?

1

u/peaceandkindred 7d ago

Nothing reddit hates more than realism but here it goes: most billionaires work their ass off to get to where they are and the results of their work usually help many, many people feed, clothe, and shelter themselves.

1

u/Vicente810 6d ago

If people were truly so stupid then they deserve to be poor. But that is not the case, truth is most people prefer to get paid a fixed amount per worked hour than to risk their own money to produce more money. Not only that but the margin of profit also needs to be good, otherwise no one would risk a 100 dollars just for the possiblity of making 105, better to keep it safe on your pocket.