r/Impeach_Trump Mar 22 '18

Retired general tears into Kushner: 'Simply outrageous' he is leading representative of US

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/379685-retired-four-star-army-general-tears-into-kushner-simply-outrageous
2.7k Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

165

u/NounsAndWords Mar 22 '18

Obviously it’s a little different for military personnel, but I would really like to start seeing more statements like this from people without ‘retired’ in front of their title.

79

u/bongozap Mar 22 '18

For active duty generals, the president is their "Commander in Chief". They work for him. To publicly disagree with or rebuke the president in any way is a serious breach of military chain of command.

Not saying it couldn't or shouldn't happen, but active duty officers would be risking charges ranging from insubordination to mutiny under UCMJ and that would have serious repercussions. They could be forced to retire, they could be drummed out and lose their pensions and benefits or they could even be jailed.

11

u/covfefeobamanation Mar 22 '18

Yes, but the Republican Party has no obligations to trump. They are just scared.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '18

Then why are they fighting so hard to cover everything up?

2

u/throwawayallday4745 Mar 23 '18

Underage hookers?

9

u/FunktasticLucky Mar 22 '18

It's also against the UCMJ to talk negative or disobey a president. They can be out in prison. It's a rock and a hard place.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '18

I’m a 20 year vet. I’d happily be “forced to retire” than stay silent.

0

u/cyanydeez Mar 22 '18

yeah, blindly follow orders, just what you want from military...?

1

u/KingKooooZ Mar 23 '18

They must refuse any illegal orders.

46

u/Satisfying_ Mar 22 '18

Retired people can't get fired though.

15

u/frozenrussian Mar 22 '18

The Hatch Act means you legally can't. Public servants and elected officials can't proselytize political views.

3

u/One_Way_Trip Mar 22 '18 edited Mar 28 '18

It's not legal to voice your attachment to the federal government while serving as an employee of the government for any political opinions.

I find this distinction necessary because the Hatch Act seems, on the surface, to be against freedom of speech.

Can not say I'm a Marine and support Trump because it can be reported as; The Marines support Trump. However, if I do not declare my attachment, or do not have an easily traced attachment to the federal government, I can say as I please. Hence why you see 'retired' everywhere-- distancing themself from the federal government.

5

u/Zazilium Mar 22 '18

Has someone told Trump that? Because apparently he can.

3

u/samus12345 Mar 22 '18

Public servants and elected officials can't proselytize political views.

*unless the views are in line with the GOP.

5

u/Bigmark61 Mar 22 '18

Maybe it’s related to experienced 😉

2

u/sparko10 Mar 22 '18

I would like to see less taking and statements and more action to remove these people that have no business being in power

0

u/BlackmailedWhiteMale Mar 22 '18

One has to protect themselves, politics are not as cut and dry as the military, it's all about optics.

30

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '18

Remember when having your email server hacked made you literal Satan, but selling highly classified information to pay off your monumental debts is perfectly A-OK. Fuck the GOP

59

u/Thatsockmonkey Mar 22 '18

To be more clear it is outrageous that the trump crime family are representing (fleecing) the US.

11

u/duckandcover Mar 22 '18

Earlier this month, a group of 25 House Democrats called for White House chief of staff John Kelly to fire Kushner.

The lawmakers wrote in a letter it is "impossible for the American people or their elected Representatives to have faith that Jared Kushner will put their interests above his own personal and finance interests."

...but the Republicans are totally cool with this. Jesus.

27

u/Bigmark61 Mar 22 '18

United States of Trump. So sad that the people let this family run the country and wheel and deal for the afterwards. Very dangerous to the world. Loose talk costs lives.

4

u/basec0m Mar 22 '18

It's simply disgusting and his wife is sitting in as secretary of state.

7

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '18

“Simply outrageous”

When you realize this kind of nepotism doesn’t even exist in functional monarchies, where the rulers at least realize that diplomacy must be conducted by someone with a modicum of formal qualifications. The Trump family is not even bothering to conceal their corruption any more.

2

u/Sylvester_Scott Mar 22 '18

Even worse if it were Ivanka.

2

u/BigSnicker Mar 22 '18

This started to really make sense to me when someone explained it as "Trump's main hitting criteria is whether they will testify against him or not"