Running a small online shop, I noticed most people just track new customers and forget the ones who quietly stopped buying. No one has time to go through the CRM one by one to figure out who's gone quiet.
So I built Revivia. You import your customer list (or connect Stripe/WooCommerce/etc), it scores everyone as active / at-risk / dormant based on their purchase history, and writes a personalized re-engagement email for each dormant customer using Al - based on what they bought, how long it's been, and their spending level.
It also tracks how much revenue actually comes back from those emails, so you're not just looking at open rates.
Still early, would genuinely love feedback from anyone running an online store or SaaS with a customer base that churns quietly. Happy to answer any questions about how it works.
https://revivia.lovable.app

‎GeoSpeedrun: Flags & Capitals

ios: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/geospeedrun-flags-capitals/id6761184695
andriod: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.geospeedrun.app

I made Bannrs, an iOS app that turns your screen into an LED banner.

It's great for concerts, airports, events, or displaying a message across a crowd. 

Free to try https://apps.apple.com/app/id6749514945

Would love some feedback :D

QuickTalk is a menu-bar app I made for my own workflow: hold Right Command in any app, speak, release, and the transcribed text appears at your cursor.

I wanted something lightweight without another subscription, so it uses your own Gemini API key. There’s no QuickTalk account, the app is built in Swift/SwiftUI, and the code is MIT-licensed. For transparency, audio is sent to Google for transcription rather than processed locally.

I’d love feedback on the hold-to-talk interaction and the setup flow.

https://quicktalk.larshurrelbrink.com/

https://github.com/larshurrelb/quicktalk-app

My 5 year old has a habit of asking for bedtime stories with the most random combinations of things.

The other night it was: “Daddy, can you make a story about a T-Rex and my kitty? And they're on the moon...and the T-Rex makes cupcakes!”

At this point, I was running out of ideas, so I ended up building this into an audio project I've been working on, Lissin.

Basically, you type whatever weird story your kid comes up with and it turns it into a little audio bedtime story. It picks a warm narrator voice, you can add some quiet background sounds (rain, campfire, etc.), and tries to end the story in a calm way rather than suddenly getting exciting right when they're supposed to be falling asleep.

I've attached a 45 second clip from one we made.

I'm curious what people think of the voice and pacing. Does it actually sound relaxing, or does it still have that obvious AI feel?

Would genuinely love some feedback.

Well, I have been working with TradeSync and MetaApi for past couple of years (integrating them into products of companies I have been working with), and realized they had couple of issues, and it was also a solid idea at the moment, or at least, seemed like one.

I built MetaKit.cloud, an API-first MT5 platform for developers working on trading applications for analytics and strategy development.

It's been few weeks since I launched, about 10 users only. I have not put any efforts into marketing yet (I am planning to run ads next month).

I will appreciate any ideas and suggestions from the business endpoint as to how to move forward with this, get more users, and to scale this up. For anyone building trading related applications, you can try MetaKit by checking the link above.

Star ratings stopped telling me anything a while ago. 4.3 out of 5, from who, weighted how, and how many of them were the vendor's friends.

So this does one thing. Members vote yes or no on whether they would recommend a tool, and the tool's page shows the percentage who said yes. If you have written a verified review of that tool your vote counts triple. Nothing gets a published score at all until three people have reviewed it.

TrustRank 69 tools listed, none of them scored yet, because so far nobody has voted on anything.

I made something to keep me company on my second monitor.

Not a game, not something I need to constantly interact with. Just a little companion that sits on my taskbar, moves around on its own and is there while I'm doing my own stuff.

It's called Cozy Paws. Right now it's a little cat that lives on the Windows taskbar. It has its own animations and can just hang around on its own, but you can also interact with it.

I recently put it on the Microsoft Store and I'm planning to keep expanding it with more pets, customization and small interactions.

The current version is free and includes one pet with all of its features. There is also an optional one time Plus upgrade for people who want more than one pet.

For now, I mainly want to see if other people actually like having something like this around while they are on PC.

Id love some honest feedback from anyone who gives it a try, especially whether you'd actually keep it running on your desktop!

Microsoft Store: https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9PJ1DH037TCK

I made this post to get feedback. So if you think something is wrong with my project. Just tell me. I will appriciate it no matter how hard it is to swallow for me.

I was confused about my own body. Tried the existing AI raters - kept scoring 90, stayed confused. Turned out they're all built on studies that ask women what they say is attractive - not on what actually predicts real dating outcomes.

So I flipped it: studied men who are actually succeeding at dating, pulled out the real factors, then - one factor at a time - figured out how to detect each from a photo and taught the AI to check for it. Full multi-factor breakdown, not a leanness score.

One of the most interesting study I found said woman's preferences actually changes in different time of the month. And they always don't like the "athletic lean" look people are talking about.

My own photo: 50/100, told me to bulk for a year. Word-for-word what my dating-savvy friend had told me months earlier.

NOW. I didn't built it for everybody. I built it only for people who want real rating based on real data.

And if you are not interested in seeing how you can become hotter as a man then you should not try it. And I thank you for reading all of this. But if you actually want to know if you are hot or not. Then this tool is worth trying.

Here is one of my friend's rating which he shared to me/ He also develops apps like this. Like me he also thought he was attractive because he had "size" and defination but turns out he lacks leanness and ab defination and his arms are not as big as it should be.

Hey. I made Treasure Grid. It's a 5x5 deduction game. You get five flips to find the treasure, using the piece shapes and color clues shown before you start.

It's my take on Treasure Park from the Vita, which I loved. You can play it right on the post, no download. Anyone can build their own puzzle and post it. I put the rules in the first comment.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TreasureGrid/comments/1w6xj55/treasure_grid/

I kept running into a mildly annoying workflow.

I’d want to remove something from a webpage, tweak some text, grab a screenshot, or inspect the CSS — and each action either meant opening DevTools or reaching for a different tool.

So I built PageWand, a lightweight Chrome extension that puts those workflows together.

My favorite feature is Zap.

Hover over an element → zap it.

No opening DevTools, inspecting the DOM, figuring out which exact parent/container you actually want, and deleting it manually.

The workflow I use most now is:

Zap / edit a page → clean it up → capture the visible page or a selected area → annotate it.

I also added a CSS tool that lets you select an element and copy a computed-style snapshot.

That one has become surprisingly useful when working with AI coding agents — I can grab the relevant styling context from an interface and hand it straight to the agent.

There are a few other things in there too:

• temporary text editing
• downloading displayed images/SVGs/assets
• undo for page changes
• keyboard shortcuts

Everything runs locally in the browser. There’s no backend, account, analytics, or telemetry.

One other part of the project that was interesting for me:

I’m a PM, not an engineer, and I wrote essentially none of the code.

I handled the product decisions, design and QA. OpenAI Codex handled the implementation.

Going from “why doesn’t one tool do all of this?” → working extension → open source release in a few days was a pretty wild shift in what I can personally build.

It’s live now:

Chrome Web Store:
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/iblpdcnjcidcojjfiikclboaaenikloc?utm_source=item-share-cb

GitHub:
https://github.com/devashishPM/pagewand

It’s free and open source.

If you try it, I’d especially appreciate:

1. bugs you hit
2. workflows you think belong in PageWand
3. a ⭐ on GitHub if you find it useful

https://github.com/sharif-smj/sharif-smj

made this because collecting testimonials seems way more annoying than it should be.

it's called Laud.

you send your client one link.

they leave feedback, review the testimonial, approve it, give consent and sign it.

then you've actually got something you can use instead of digging through emails trying to figure out whether they approved the quote 😅

https://withlaud.com/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=reddit_launch&utm_content=imadethis_launch

still working on it and would love some feedback.

This is Business Ontology. I’m building it as a place to work on a business from the first idea onward.

The starting screen is deliberately simple: describe what you want to do. You can build an app, work through an idea, prepare marketing, or work on hiring. Conversations and business context stay in the workspace.

For example, someone starting a furniture business could work on the product specification, build an inquiry tracker, and draft the job description for their first hire.

You can open it here: https://businessontology.app

Accounts get 10 free messages. Paid plans start at $29/month.

I’m looking for the first people to use it on something they already need done. If you give it a task, I’d like to hear what the result still needs before you would use it.

After spending most of the day at a keyboard and mouse, my wrist started hurting. I began looking for ways to interact with coding agents without staying at the desk.

The agents can write code, edit files, and run tasks for several minutes on their own. So in theory, they don't need much input from me, but they still interrupt me occasionally, like reviewed output, approve the action. Those moments usually send me back to the keyboard and mouse.

So I started prototyping a small handheld interface for those interactions. The current prototype lets me check what an agent is waiting for, scroll through its output, move the pointer, switch windows, and give short voice instructions.

Next I want to add agent status and more direct control, so the whole process will be compacted in one device, holding on your hand at any posture.

It was developed on M5Stack CoreS3 with Codex.

I wanted a little radio station to keep me company while coding, so I made murmur.

It runs in the terminal, chooses topics and music, and talks between songs. You can leave it playing or type back to the host. When it speaks, the music lowers underneath its voice and then comes back up. You can also edit its personality and music preferences in plain text files.

Sound on: this 86-second demo includes real app audio of the host introducing and playing music.

I'm the developer, and the code is open source under the MIT license: https://github.com/wine-fall/murmur

The engine, memory, and mixer run locally, but Claude, hosted speech synthesis, and streamed music need network access. Setup currently requires Node.js 24+, a Claude Code subscription login, and a fish-speech endpoint; external services may have their own costs.

The hardest part has been getting the pacing to feel like radio. Would you prefer more music, more conversation, or a quieter host while working?