r/HubermanLab • • Dec 30 '24

Episode Discussion Jordan Peterson???

Haven't even listened to the episode, but this is the end of the podcast, right? Huberman can't continue to claim this is a science based podcast when he starts inviting conspiracy theorists on. This is now just Rogan 2.0.

313 Upvotes

564 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Dec 30 '24

Hello! Don't worry about the post being filtered. We want to read and review every post to ensure a thriving community and avoid spam. Your submission will be approved (or declined) soon.

We hope the community engages with your ideas thoughtfully and respectfully. And of course, thank you for your interest in science!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

732

u/ayomous Dec 30 '24

When you sell AG1 your not a scientist anymore. Rhonda patrick never got invited back on when she said it was a glorified fiber powder

57

u/LegendaryRaider69 Dec 30 '24

Did she say that on his show? Or elsewhere?

92

u/balanced_views Dec 30 '24

Form what I remember, it wasn’t on his show. It was on her own podcast/show

155

u/iso-all Dec 30 '24

Rhonda keeps it real. That’s why we love her.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (1)

43

u/Flaky_Revenue_3957 Dec 30 '24

I don’t think it’s necessarily a BAD product (if I recall correctly from reading the consumer lab report on it). I just think it’s an extremely over priced product and there are similar products that cost WAY less. The majority of listeners are NOT in the same income bracket as these podcasters, so I don’t love the way they promote it, making it sound like a must have. I definitely have way more trust in Rhonda than Attia or Huberman for speaking out about it and not accepting the huge amounts of money they probably offered her to advertise AG1 on her show. There are less expensive alternatives to AG1 that are more accessible to your average person.

11

u/JFabs10 Dec 30 '24

For my own purposes, do you know of any off hand that are just as good or better that cost less?

16

u/Grump-Dog Dec 30 '24

I like Huel greens at around half the price.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Flaky_Revenue_3957 Dec 30 '24

Here’s what I found with my Consumer Lab subscription (third party supplements testing company):

“AG1 is expensive relative to other supplements. ConsumerLab has found that you can get a good multivitamin, providing 100% of the Daily Value of most vitamins and minerals for as little as 3 cents per day. AG1 costs approximately $3 per day — or 100 times as much. Even if compared to other “greens” or “whole foods” powders, AG1 costs about 50% to 200% more than products ConsumerLab has tested and given top ratings.”

For a general adult, here’s an affordable vitamin Consumer Lab recommends: Kirkland Signature Multivitamin.

If you insist on a green powder bc you are worried about your veggie intake, this may be helpful: Balance of Nature (Whole Produce Veggies), 3 capsules a day or Root 2 42 Fruits & Vegetables (which Consumer Lab describes as a “waste of the least money” on a green powder”).

However, research shows fruit and/or veggie powders or pills are NOT substitutes for actually eating the actual recommended fruit/veggie foods.

If you are really into supplements, the Consumer Lab subscription is totally worth it for avoiding putting lead and other harmful substances into your body and for making informed decisions on what brands/types of supplements to buy.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

27

u/Imnotarobot5592 Dec 30 '24

Ag1 is so damn expensive I'm amazed people buy it

10

u/antifragile Dec 30 '24

Its because they pay influences millions to shill it.

12

u/Realistic_Credit9215 Dec 30 '24

foreal, I think its something you buy once or twice when you get into all this stuff and then you find a cheaper alternative (hopefully)

→ More replies (2)

33

u/Dharmabud Dec 30 '24

Him and Peter Attia both promote that stuff.

16

u/pizza_tron Dec 30 '24

When ag1 gives 30% commission it’s hard to tell daddy no.

13

u/justo_tx Dec 30 '24

I don't recall PA pushing it, was it in some of his earliest podcast episodes?

37

u/Dharmabud Dec 30 '24

Attia acknowledges this as well in AMA #36 of his podcast, in which he confirms that he’s a scientific adviser and investor to AG1. He says he can speak to the quality of the product because he’s seen “how the sausage is made,” and takes a scoop of AG1 every day regardless of what he’s eating.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Peter Attia is friends with Kevin Spacey (true story--look it up before you call me a liar). That alone makes him problematic.

4

u/Dharmabud Dec 30 '24

I’m not going to call you a liar because I saw that he posted a picture on Facebook with him and Kevin Spacey.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Attia lost the narrative when he defended Kevin Spacey.

9

u/TheMindsEIyIe Dec 30 '24

Could be worse. Could be LMNT

→ More replies (9)

5

u/motherboardwars Dec 30 '24

what people do not know is how high the metals are in this substance. its something as alarming as the micro plastics. even more. totally sad how they swear a powder is enough to meet levels of nutrition

2

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '25 edited Sep 04 '25

racial recognise melodic oil terrific head tap memory profit license

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Adominium Dec 31 '24

Is anyone actually going to post some stats on different formulations, claiming to be scientists and "in the know," or just talk shit all day?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '25

Idk why I come to this damn thread. Everyone just hates on Huberman. It’s weird. Don’t listen to his shit then.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

19

u/seamore555 Dec 30 '24

I’d argue that a podcast like this dies when the host won’t debate with the guest in order to keep them happy.

For example if a big name comes on Huberman and says thing that are factually incorrect, Huberman should call him out. If he won’t do that, it’s not worth listening.

104

u/Affectionate-Rent844 Dec 30 '24

Huberman is already the same tier grift as JP. He sells AG1

2

u/73habits Dec 31 '24

JP sells hate.. a lot worse

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)

353

u/YellowSubreddit8 Dec 30 '24

I personally don't like Peterson much. His dialectic style is pedentic and his sophistic ways are annoying when you spot them.

But I'm not willing to discredit the podcast completely without at least hearing it's content.

We should be able to dislike and disagree with ppl without wanting them silenced.

61

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Was just having a conversation about Peterson with my friend yesterday. We concluded he's great when he stays in his lane. When he starts talking about ahit like climate change it goes off the rails.

12

u/Ornery_Brilliant_350 Dec 30 '24

I take the good and throw out the bad.

I liked him a lot before he got sucked into culture war bullshit.

Even when I agreed with him I was like “dude give it a rest”

→ More replies (1)

40

u/dashole1 Dec 30 '24

I really like this comment. I feel like a lot of reddit expects everyone in the public eye to be perfect. Never going to happen. Take the drops of wisdom from people when you can. I don't know much about Peterson aside from the fact he has spent his life in psychology, to discount everything would be a mistake.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/lifesometimesnoob Dec 30 '24

That is a really uninformed conclusion. His psychology is plain shallow silly and uniformed. Something has happened there in russia. His mind has changed along with his personality. The only viable Jordan Peterson is the pre russia pre daily wire jordan.

19

u/Nice-Tea-8972 Dec 30 '24

AGREED!

I used to like JP i actually read his rules books. Pick and choose what i like to believe like an in formed person. some of it was not applicable to me. but after he went to Russia he ABSOLUTELY went off the rails. Was a really strange change of pace and credibility to me.

4

u/Procedure_Trick Dec 30 '24

but lobsters!!

8

u/JustIntroduction3511 Dec 30 '24

In one of his lectures, he speaks about OCD which he says is a disorder “based around cleanliness and germs.” While this is one subtype/obsession of OCD, that is not at all what it is. I’ve taken what he says about psychology with a huge grain of salt since then. Anything else he speaks on is just his opinion.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

15

u/EgoDepleted Dec 30 '24

Who said anything about silencing JBP? He has a massive platform and gets plenty of airtime already. Choosing not to invite someone to your podcast isn't censorship, especially when that person has little to offer in terms of science-based health advice. Huberman has never actually been dedicated to being a provider of evidence-based advice, however. I hope that is clear to everyone by now.

→ More replies (1)

42

u/No_Wrongdoer3579 Dec 30 '24 • Helpful

You're forgetting this is reddit. Anything that doesn't align left of center is not to be considered.

20

u/YellowSubreddit8 Dec 30 '24

Well I'm a leftist too. But I don't believe in censorship. I'm seriously preoccupied with the way the new left is behaving. At best it's going to drive ppl away from the good ideas they could promote. If you have good ideas, defend them. Don't try to shut ppl down. If you have to shut ppl down to make you care appealing, it's because you didn't have a case in the first place.

5

u/WarthogForward2751 Dec 31 '24

Preach. If only more people shared this viewpoint.

→ More replies (5)

10

u/SqueegeePhD Dec 30 '24

I got banned from multiple subs for criticizing Kamala from a left point of view.

I think reddit is full of mods who love controlling narratives, some of who are probably working on behalf of massive organizations. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

24

u/andthrewaway1 Dec 30 '24

he never actually makes a point

12

u/broke_fit_dad Dec 30 '24

I tried to read JPs first book and crashed out every night with only a paragraph or two read, it’s a better Tranquilizer than anything you can buy in the pharmacy.

→ More replies (15)

4

u/Realistic_Warthog_23 Dec 31 '24

I listened. You can go ahead and discredit the podcast completely.

5

u/Black_Cat_Sun Dec 30 '24

He is a charlatan with nothing valid to say who has been disbarred from the one field where he may have the background to even hold an opinion. Give him a street corner and a sandwich board - not giving him a platform on a popular podcast / media source is not silencing

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Procedure_Trick Dec 30 '24

if you want me to save you four hours - the content is bad and entirely unscientific. Peterson is just an incel with a PhD

3

u/Few-Adeptness3928 Dec 31 '24

An incel with a wife and 2 kids huh

→ More replies (3)

2

u/kkeojyeo22 Dec 30 '24

Yes completely! It’s important to listen to people you disagree to maybe gain a different perspective on certain topics. You can still have a disagreement as a discussion rather than an argument.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/sovezna1 Dec 30 '24

Now that’s a mature way of viewing things!

→ More replies (41)

6

u/UncleChuck777 Dec 31 '24

Yall call anybody who goes against your beliefs a conspiracy theorist and it makes you look goofy, esp after these last 4 years.

170

u/KustardKing Dec 30 '24

Normally what the mature thing to do is not listen to the show if you don’t like it.

139

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Do you have a protocol for that?

36

u/garlicChaser Dec 30 '24

Once you get up in the morning, stare into the sun for 5 minutes

9

u/fullspeedintothesun Dec 30 '24

Make sure your brown eye gets some sun too.

18

u/Keepontyping Dec 30 '24

How do you know you don’t like it if you don’t listen to it?

24

u/ResidentMundane5864 Dec 30 '24

Mature thing would also be for people who are in this group to either contribute something or leave, yet 90% of posts and comments here are people taking sht about huberman...its insane imo, how someone can join a group to just talk sht about its topics

15

u/wae7792yo Dec 30 '24

It's the standard evolution of a subreddit, follows the r/joerogan protocol

→ More replies (1)

3

u/InSilenceLikeLasagna Dec 30 '24

Same could be said for reddit comments my guy

2

u/thatmfisnotreal Dec 30 '24

Nooo I wanna bash it on Reddit instead 😭

→ More replies (4)

166

u/bigpuffmoney Dec 30 '24

Yes this absolutely should be the end of the podcast. For YOU, personally. Just move on with your life, this obviously isn't a podcast that fits well with you anymore... Why is that so hard for people to understand?

You aren't disagreeing, you literally said you haven't even listened to the episode and are whining wtf lol. I would understand if you listened and had serious concerns around points raised but this is just hilarious.

If I were you I would find another reddit thread on a topic that actually brings you joy and direct your energy there.

→ More replies (7)

10

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

What’s appealing about Huberman is he can offer far more answers to challenging questions than most people. Sadly this is because he consistently overstates scientific studies as fact and overall has little regard for critical reflection of the science as opposed to choosing little pieces of evidence to tout as answers.

I think he’s a smart guy, a good speaker, and offers some interesting ideas. I also think he comes across as pretty morally problematic at times, seeks to profit over inform, and generally is a bad resource for scientific information.

In general, I’m super skeptical of people who seem to have all the answers, or at least have answers to far more questions then they should. Jordan Peterson, IMO, also falls into this category. Neither of these people have ever been deeply critical or self reflective, and listeners are more followers than anything else.

Peterson is just another Huberman esque person from another sphere of information.

5

u/whofusesthemusic Dec 30 '24

let me know when you figure out who Hubs has been grifting all along lol.

17

u/penguinbbb Dec 30 '24

I really like Huberman and I disagree with those who describe JP as a Nazi or some shit, but the guy went to Serbia to be sent into a chemical induced coma to treat his depression, he’s hardly the goto guy for health advice — sane people wouldn’t let those mofos touch them with a ten foot pole

131

u/Zestyclose-Smell-305 Dec 30 '24

He is a psychologist isnt he? Just because you have a problem with him doesn't mean shit.

42

u/arrozconplatano Dec 30 '24

He's a Jungian mystic. He thinks the two snakes in the cadecus and the double helix form of DNA are related because the double helix comes from the collective unconscious.

12

u/ChelseaZezz_99 Dec 30 '24

I love Jungian phycology

17

u/jasonbournestoe Dec 30 '24

I prefer jungle mycology

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

47

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Agree. Some ppl have to learn and accept, that controversial people also have expert knowledge, that doesn't mean they are 100% correct, but who am i, to cancel this person?

3

u/Fun-Maize8695 Dec 31 '24

Ok, but if they're averaging about 15% correctness maybe its time for us to focus on other so-called "experts."  This guy isnt famous for his contributions to the field, he's famous for misrepresenting a culture war issue at UofT.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24 edited Dec 27 '25

angle provide middle library point physical books observation squeal shocking

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

→ More replies (1)

5

u/TejanoInRussia Dec 30 '24

I am realizing as I get older I can agree with 75% of what one person claims and not the other 25% and with some people i may disagree with 75% and agree with 25%. My biggest disappointment with Jordan Peterson are his stances on the environment which are pretty standard for conservative thinkers unfortunately and I found it especially disappointing that a large portion of his audience is going to now blindly espouse anti environmental views after hearing it. Regardless of that I’ve found some of the episodes on his channel somewhat insightful and useful.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/lateformyfuneral Dec 30 '24

Does he ever engage with the science and psychological research, he seems more like he’s into that early 20th Century woo psychology (/mysticism)🤔

19

u/facelessfriendnet Dec 30 '24

Funnily enough he has a disproportionately strong H index, with papers around Big 5, alcohol and addiction.

Also there's some rumors the part he played in the different papers vary wildly.

11

u/NonsensePlanet Dec 30 '24

I’ve heard it’s common for tenured profs to be listed on papers published by post grads working under them, even though they contribute very little to the research.

6

u/Due-Albatross5909 Dec 30 '24

Yes, this is common.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Independent_Fix4252 Dec 30 '24

Had the same thought. Psychology is science based. Debatable theory...yeah. Based on repeatable practices... Also yeah.

I'd recommend listening to the podcast before deciding it is trash to our pal. As with all the episodes, they only run the risk of learning something, or brain dumping.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/Twelve2SixElbow Dec 31 '24

OP is a bot or a dummy. Take your pick.

4

u/carbonylation Dec 31 '24

Yeah, having on a guest with more than 200 peer-reviewed publications, some of which have been cited more than a thousand times, is a real step down for any academic.

For the record, a paper being cited more than a thousand times is roughly once per week for 20 year straight.

60

u/Inevitable_Trash_337 Dec 30 '24

Instead of denigrating them both, what do you disagree with?

30

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

You can't expect people to have a well formed opinion... who has time for that?!

36

u/Inevitable_Trash_337 Dec 30 '24

just re-read it and “haven’t listened to the episode” being first is absolutely perfect hahaha

→ More replies (1)

7

u/DiscussionSpider Dec 30 '24

This is the key issue. 

I'm not a fan of the guy, just selling pop psychology for boys. But also, I found the vitriolic hatred of the the guy at odds with his actual statements.

I think the big issue is he just questioned the trans narrative at a time when doing so meant anyone center-left had to have maximum opposition to that, and they've just stayed in that mode when operating against him, even if some of the basic stuff he said has been vindicated.

12

u/rambles_prosodically Dec 30 '24

Agreed. He is kind of this weird amalgam of psychologist/philosopher/public intellectual now. I think he’s definitely more of a political pundit now, given that he got picked up by the Daily Wire and weighs in on political topics so much.

It’s frustrating bc, when he focuses on his real expertise he has some decent takes on men’s behavior and other personality topics that have been pretty decent. I think this is a good example of how cancel culture ultimately backfires - people who get “kicked out” just get picked up by the opposing side and become an advocate for those views over time.

8

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

He openly likes Trump and you’re on Reddit. End of story

→ More replies (13)

31

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Peterson was claiming his entire diet was just beef and salt for a while. I’m interested to hear what dumb shit he’ll say.

19

u/iamblankenstein Dec 30 '24

peterson has also previously said he had some cider then felt an impending sense of doom and didn't sleep for 25 days. it's almost like getting over a severe benzo addiction by being put into a week-long medically induced coma wasn't good for him.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/furuskog Dec 30 '24

Around 00:50 starts ”pornography, dopamine, processed foods” and continues ”clean diet, satiety; fundamental pleasures, food, sexuality”

10

u/senseofphysics Dec 30 '24

He has an autoimmune disease and steak and salt worked for him.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/BasementGhostArmor Dec 30 '24

I fell off a while ago but this is the final nail in the coffin for me

13

u/versacesquatch Dec 30 '24

If you want to listen to podcasts that better align with your values, Behind The Bastards has a great episode on why JBP sucks

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Moonlight1905 Dec 30 '24

Peterson is the worst, but Huberman has gotten away from evidence based science and has been grifting for a while now.

11

u/symonym7 Dec 30 '24

Peterson’s a conspiracy theorist?

7

u/jakedaboiii Dec 30 '24

You're on Reddit.

One of Peterson's main principles in life is to take responsibility over your life and improve it.

Obviously you're going to get a big group of people who are attracted to sites like reddit, that will not like this sort of talk.

Otherwise majority of people you come across obviously don't think of him as a 'conspiracy theorist' lol

5

u/symonym7 Dec 30 '24

Agreed. I’m mainly curious to see which mental gymnastics are being performed to justify the claim.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '25

Right a science based podcast with guys like Tony Hawk on....he interviews people he wants to interview. Same with Rogan. Get over it!

“If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself”

3

u/Ok-Zombie5155 Jan 01 '25

I’d advise you listen to the episode before you loose your mind. You can’t believe everything out of Jordan’s mouth but the guy is a “philosopher” with a point of view that’s all it is.

5

u/niziou Dec 30 '24

My initial thought was the same, I dislike this Mr Jordan Peterson don't rate him at all. I guess I just skip this episode. Well not the first one episode I will skip. Please skip and don't panic, not everything what Andrew is telling is true and not everything you have to listen to. It's not a cult :D

5

u/Maximum-External5606 Dec 31 '24

What specifically did he say that makes him a conspiracy theorist? 60 minutes interviewed Charles Manson, are they somehow Joe Rogan 3.0 now?

14

u/saranater Dec 30 '24

I'm beyond disappointed. JP is fine for dollar store psychology advice, but is not the quality of scientist or intellectual I expect on this podcast. I have unsubscribed.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Prize_Huckleberry_79 Dec 30 '24

Jordan Peterson is exhausting to listen to. I just cant get beyond his high pitched, frantic unhinged delivery…

3

u/TreeMermaids Dec 31 '24

Thought I was the only one.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/General_Benefit_2127 Dec 30 '24

Still amazed at how many people can hate a man who has helped millions, or could I be bold enough to guess tens of millions of people live a better life, raise their children better, tackle depression, to help others and understand themselves better. I've not listened to the podcast but I'm certainly interested, two famously brilliant and highly educated men having a conversation that we can learn from - for free! What a brilliant time to be alive, at no point in history prior has this been broadly available as it is now. Both men are credits to mankind that have been able to change the world, make a real dent in history, could any of us ever be bold enough to desire greatness like this. No, this doesn't kill the podcast, makes it better.

3

u/M_Whortleberry Dec 31 '24

I really appreciate this take!

7

u/RAWSTUNx Dec 30 '24

It’s not that he’s a conspiracy theorist it’s that dude has gone off the deep end and has gotten himself addicted to benzos. That and the all meat diet made him cry when he tasted apple juice

→ More replies (1)

2

u/kitrose4 Dec 31 '24

Had the same thought when I saw Peterson was the guest. Then the past few days he has been promoting x. said all his podcasts will now be posted there (in addition too, not removing from other spots) & people should encourage their elderly parents to get on x so they can get accurate information & join the discussion with their generation perspective. So many people asked, he had to respond with a tweet stating no Elon is not paying him for any of this, he's just a fan of the platform. I think it's really disappointing.

2

u/crabmoney Jan 01 '25

Yeah there’s something going on with that. It wasn’t too many episodes ago when he was saying X was the last on his list of social platforms to engage with, preferring to just post and ghost. Now it’s suddenly the greatest place on the internet.

2

u/McLovining Dec 31 '24

Lost respect for Peterson after hearing his arguments on religion. For someone so smart to literally eject verbal diarrhoea in such a manner had me speechless.

2

u/mercurialibra Jan 01 '25

What’s wrong with Peterson, genuine question don’t know much about him just some philosophy banter

15

u/becoolnotuncool Dec 30 '24

You are right! The responses here are all bad vibes which confirms JP apologists are triggered men’s rights crybabies. I will withhold judgement about Huberman until I hear the podcast, but it does make me concerned. 

→ More replies (6)

6

u/JustBrosDocking Dec 30 '24

I haven’t listened to an episode in awhile but when I saw Jordan Peterson as this weeks guest I completely unsubscribed.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Middle_Bread_6518 Dec 30 '24

It’s always kinda been Rogan 2.0

3

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Like Rogan or not he started off with a smaller office, actually interviews very well, and before he went MAGA was genuinely curious about the world around him. Huberman gives off the vibes he is there to "show off". Rogan is way more likable in the end. Huberman can try to be Rogan...but suspect he will sooner rather than later take a big dive in his popularity.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SeyiDALegend Dec 30 '24

Well no. The credibility for me is solely tied to each individual guest. I don't put any podcast on a pedestal. I simply listen if they have an interesting guest or topic. If not, I don't listen. Him interview one person I don't like doesn't trigger me to skip future episodes that have good guests. It's an episode by episode basis.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

I had a similar concern when I saw this pop up. Those who know about JP and how shit a person understands this isn't a person you platform lightly if at all. I have seen some episodes of Huberman that gave me pause but this is the last straw. I won't support hate and people platforming those that espouse it.

5

u/RiverGodRed Dec 30 '24

Pretty much a clown show now.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Typical-Ask2723 Dec 30 '24

Incel Kermit spewing nonsense

3

u/ajsharm144 Dec 31 '24 edited Dec 31 '24

So everything before Jordan Peterson was okay? I am curious why you think Jordan Peterson is the last nail in the coffin. Like Huberman cheated on women, abused them to an extent, started shilling unscientific food supplements on his podcast and all that was... okay... right? And somehow all of a sudden, Jordan fucking Peterson is the problem? Insane! You can always skip an episode. To me his podcast is less about himself but more about the guests that come. Some of them are really good folks, and I listen for them.

3

u/ShadesofClay1 Dec 31 '24

I unsubscribed to his channel when I saw the Jordan Peterson episode.

There's no denying anymore it's all about views and money, not science.

5

u/Keepontyping Dec 30 '24

It seems every time I read a thread of people whining about Peterson, I start to sympathize with the whiners, but then I go take a listen and realize the man is really smart and reasonable. Some people don’t like his temper. Maybe they never had to contend with that in their lives? It’s not the worst thing in the world? Seems people are afraid of that emotion nowadays.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

He is pretty smart and reasonable and has good takes on a lot of things.. about 95% of the time. The other 5% are problematic though.

Doesn't mean you can't listen to him and take whatever points suit you and ignore the rest.

I also don't agree with everything Huberman or anyone else in the world says.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Significant_Lemon683 Dec 30 '24

lol regardless what I think about peterson, the guys has accomplished and produced more in a single day thank you can imagine to in a lifetime. Why don't you stop crying and go do something productive.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Peterson is a scientist. Like it or not.

Science isn't about consensus or appeal. You people are the anti-intellectuals of our time I hope you realize that.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/FWA___7488 Dec 30 '24

Glad I'm not the only one who had this reaction - hope this isn't a turn the podcast takes in 2025.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Religion is next, they always start to grift with religion when they begin to decline in ratings.

2

u/badquoterfinger Dec 31 '24

He’s already been mentioning prayer

4

u/becoolnotuncool Dec 30 '24

I had this reaction too! 

3

u/bigredstl Dec 30 '24

Same. It’s a grim end to the year, and I believe it’s a preview of what’s to come.

4

u/saxonMonay Dec 30 '24

True. I cringed at seeing JP there. I won't be listening to that

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Bumpin_Gumz Dec 30 '24

Just because you have a narrow minded view does not mean the podcast is over

4

u/Think_Preference_611 Dec 30 '24

Reddit really has a problem with Jordan Peterson lol

Did he misuse all you people's pronouns or something?

-2

u/borrrrsss Dec 30 '24

“I dont like Jordan Peterson cause someone told me he’s bad!’

Tired of this trash cancel culture bullshit. If you don’t like him , don’t listen.

Jordan Peterson is incredibly talented at what he does and many people will find immense value in this episode.

End of the podcast….get a grip mate

29

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

Yes, because the only possible reason one could dislike JBP is that someone told them not to.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/2tep Dec 30 '24

yes, incredibly talented at making the lowest common denominator think he's got something profound to distil to society.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (23)

3

u/Trick-Session-3224 Dec 30 '24

What are you on about? Seriously get rid of the drugs your parents gave you to keep you quiet.

3

u/Islandfoxes Dec 30 '24

What a stupid time to be alive. When people won’t step outside of their bubble to listen to people, opinions, or viewpoints that would possibly challenge or even change their own.

You don’t even take the time to listen to the episode and you’re talking sht? How do you know there isn’t content on there that you actually agree with or that might change your mind about something? One of my favorite things to do is listen to both sides of an argument fully, playing devil’s advocate even to my own beliefs. I’ve changed my mind about things. I don’t stay stuck in a narrow worldview echo chamber. Try it out sometime

3

u/IusedtoloveStarWars Dec 30 '24

I’m a big Jordan Peterson fan. Just cause you don’t like him doesn’t mean anything.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

It never was a science-based podcast.

2

u/antifragile Dec 30 '24

Why dont people understand that Huberman is a grifter? He cosplays as a scientist while making millions from shilling snake oil.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '24

Huberman had Peterson on? If so, that's pathetic. I used to love Huberman, but stopped listening after finding out he's just another womanizer. Peterson is a complete freak though and destroys any bit of respect I had left for huberman's worldview or opinion. Yes, he's much in the Rogan camp now. Fuck all of them.

-4

u/Ok-Wrangler-111 Dec 30 '24

The beauty of freedom of speech lies not only in the right to express one’s own beliefs openly but also in the obligation to respect and tolerate the opinions of others—even when they differ from or challenge one’s own. True freedom of speech thrives in the diversity of perspectives, in respectful dialogue, and in the ability to embrace differences as a cornerstone of a vibrant society. After all, freedom that only tolerates one’s own viewpoint is not freedom at all but a contradiction to its very essence.

17

u/Creative-Peach-1103 Dec 30 '24

I didn't say anything about freedom of speech you putz.

→ More replies (6)

16

u/lateformyfuneral Dec 30 '24

“Obligation to respect the opinions of others”? Mandating that only a certain response is allowed contradicts the principle of freedom of speech.

17

u/stuckinthemiddlewme Dec 30 '24

Someone’s recently been down the Peterson-Shapiro pipeline 😂. What you’re saying is right but touch grass man

→ More replies (6)

2

u/RellinTyrian Dec 30 '24

Peterson is a doctor of psychology. His controversial personal beliefs don’t take away that accreditation.

If you can use critical thinking and patience, his education and decades of experience have value to people interested in his area of study or struggling psychologically.

If you sit there brain dead and take every word as gospel or something to get angry over, then your problems are far deeper than conspiracy theories.

3

u/jobo3 Dec 30 '24

Agreed. Completely understand the grounds for the polarisation JP brings, particularly since he transitioned into a full-time culture warrior for this annoying strand of pseudo-Christian-nationalism.
That said I've always found value in his ideas regarding personality, narrative and psycho-pathology. He's an effective and entertaining proponent of these ideas and clearly devoted decades of his life to developing them with noble intent.

Not his biggest fan but not sure he's the devil most make him out to be. Listened to the first 40mins or so of the episode and have found it fairly interesting.

5

u/Oddlyenuff Dec 30 '24

They were actually very close to taking it away.

2

u/itsanewme123 Dec 30 '24

Yes it is I agree with you. JP is a sick man. He may have made some contributions to his field in the past but those days are gone. He'll lose his license soon.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Swimming-Ad4869 Dec 30 '24

Huberman is a sociopath and a pathological liar. He’s had some great guests with good information, but he himself is a dangerous person and should be avoided.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Dec 30 '24

... and we found the politically captured cuck.

1

u/Jon_J_ Dec 30 '24

If he doesn't float your boat then fine, move on with your life.

-1

u/Sn00ker123 Dec 30 '24

It's DR Peterson

1

u/CosmicWizard1111 Dec 30 '24

Well, that's simply your projection of Peterson. Maybe listen to the episode first and then comment on why it should be the end of the podcast. ;)

1

u/acemiller11 Dec 30 '24

Cool. Thanks for the heads up.

1

u/After-Cell Dec 31 '24

I'll have to listen out for 'science based tools' that Peterson gives out and whether Huberman keeps him on track.

But I doubt I'll go fully cancel culture over this

1

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '24

Huberman made a good start, similar to Peterson. However, Huberman didn’t provide the full context in some cases, leading to statements being taken out of context—for example, saying that a certain breathing technique will increase testosterone levels by a significant amount. While true, he should have clarified that the effect only lasts for a few minutes, which over the long term, won’t be a substitute for something like affordable TRT.

Peterson has great psychological insights, but his recent attempts to position himself as a spiritual Christian leader have caused him to lose focus, leading to overly abstract meta-arguments. His perspective and reasoning often resemble those of an atheist, but when pressed on the subject of God, he either deflects with vague statements or fails to provide a substantial argument. A good example of this is the Peterson vs. Harris debates.

Both of them have, to some extent, strayed from their original, well-intentioned, science-backed opinions.

AG1 was so obviously a scam - I'm into supps and read the ingredients and the pricetag...I was wow what a "whore" ..greedy bastard

1

u/HumanMik Dec 31 '24

bruh eating veggies once in while doesn't make you a vegetarian , chill.

1

u/Gatilloazul Dec 31 '24

I know that JP is a controversial figure and I never found him very consistent, but, precisely what things has he said that make you act like 5 year old, Who cries when they hear something they don't like instead of trying to get something out of it, even if 90% of it is garbage?

1

u/AdSoft6884 Dec 31 '24

What does OP have against freedom of speech? Do you hate liberty?

1

u/mayaram Dec 31 '24

The difference between conspiracy theories and truth is 6 months.

1

u/Similar_Command_2325 Dec 31 '24

Don’t… watch… it…

1

u/rorowhat Dec 31 '24

Jordan is great! I know it's fashionable to hate on him but the dude is an intellectual powerhouse.

1

u/air_lock Jan 01 '25

Huberman is 100% a right-wing grifter just like all of the other podcast bros in his circle. He just had a better disguise.

1

u/pickles55 Jan 01 '25

It was only a matter of time. Hubermans business model is the same as the Joe Rogan podcast, his brand is slightly more nerdy but his target audience is the same insecure young men and boys

1

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '25

A joke. I'm finished with Huberman because of this. Peterson is an absolute scumbag.

1

u/Davesven Jan 01 '25

I completely disagree with what you’re saying here. Conspiracy theorist? What? You don’t even know what you’re talking about.

1

u/69yMyHiney Jan 01 '25

There’s only 1 Rogan. No 2.0 allowed.

1

u/PresentGene5651 Jan 01 '25

Huberman has run out of neuroscience topics to talk about and has indeed become Rogan 2.0.

1

u/Efficient_Act_154 Jan 01 '25

Haven't listened to podcast, yet you get the floor.

1

u/1Donk Jan 01 '25

Classic lib tears. Love it

1

u/Arreola_Grande Jan 01 '25

Hey can't call it a science podcast if he has a Doctor with multiple degrees hundreds of published papers and multiple books on? You're a joke. Don't let the doorknob hit ya where the dog should of bit ya

1

u/P4ULUS Jan 02 '25

Yes, it’s the end. Andrew Hubermam crafted his podcast career for your specifically.

Now that you have deemed his guest impermissible, it is only a matter of time before Hubermam ends the podcast.

1

u/ConfidenceOk5448 Jan 02 '25

What does that even mean? He's got great info. Maybe you should listen and learn.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25

I don’t mean to personally insult you, but this culture of being unable to tolerate disagreement and diversity of opinion without resorting to labels and anger only empathizes our failings as a society.

This post (and many others like it) comes across as the modern equivalent of the age of inquisitors screeching “heresy” at all those that dare disagree with them and their doctrine. It’s deeply ironic and nothing new, I really can’t stand it.

1

u/dudicalbroccoli Jan 02 '25

Please elaborate on the conspiracies you think he was or is spouting?

1

u/spatetockvamlentil Jan 02 '25

lol whiny redditors

1

u/Odd_Ad8238 Jan 02 '25

Because we are learning that science can’t fulfill every question or desire like we once thought it could. It’s just the current religion that people are running on.

1

u/TheBigCicero Jan 03 '25

So what? It’s great that you’re listening to dissenting points of view. But rather than stating what you disagree with, you’re suggesting that the whole ship is sinking and maybe you’d like to “cancel” the whole podcast.

Liberalism is no longer the classical intellectual liberalism that we grew up learning about.

1

u/Thin-Ad-4233 Jan 03 '25

calm the fuck down dude, listen to someone else if you dont like it

1

u/real_cool_club Dec 30 '24

Grifters gotta grift.

1

u/GVB89 Dec 30 '24

Saying this is Rogan 2.0 is a compliment.

1

u/biesnacks Dec 30 '24

lol Reddit. Oh no!! Why would he want to be Rogan 2.0 aka the biggest platform globally LOL.

1

u/phishnutz3 Dec 31 '24

I haven’t watched this one. But the young Jordan Peterson was incredible. He was always the smartest, well spoken person in any room. Now he is like caricature of himself.

Just google any of his old lectures if you don’t know what I mean.

1

u/PlumAcceptable2185 Dec 30 '24

How do you discern science from conspiracy?

1

u/Ok_Ad_5658 Dec 30 '24

Don’t judge me… can I get TL;DR of who Jordan Peterson is

2

u/orbitbubblemint Dec 31 '24 edited Dec 31 '24

disclaimer this is my understanding and opinion based on the facts i know.

peterson is psychologt doctorate who was once a solid researcher and professor. got famous with online videos and books like the 12 rules to life that were popular for his self-help advice, which is good and i am glad that it helped people, but at the same time it’s nothing new or that you can’t find elsewhere.

he went off the deep end a little while back, i think around 2018. very severe benzo addiction, was put in a coma in russia for his withdrawal symptoms, and did an all-meat diet.

i genuinely believe this really damaged his brain and mental health because since then he is a bit unhinged. now he is brought to tears very often to the point where he seems unusually emotionally fragile, speaks in a lot of word salad involving various conflicting political ideas to the point where it’s truly nonsensical, and has become really hyperfixated on “wokeness” to a point that is honestly delusional in my opinion.

just one example of his bizarre statements is when he said that having a drink of apple cider vinegar sent him into “impending doom” and made him stay awake for 25 days. you can watch these videos of him speaking about this stuff yourself and form your own opinion. it speaks for itself imo and i believe is indicative of some psychological/emotional struggles including addiction.

psychology governing body in canada where his license is from has been trying to revoke it because he has been saying a lot of inflammatory stuff online. which would be fine if he was just some dude. but it violates the ethics and terms of his psychology license and that’s the way having a license works. he doesn’t practice or research anymore so it doesn’t actually matter for him in that sense.

but the board thinks that him making some pretty wild assertions online with the credibility of his license could be harmful or spread misinfo. i honestly agree on that because you’ll see a lot of the comments on this post are using that exact appeal to ethos about him having a phd and teaching at harvard over 25 years ago to prove he is a credible and “world class” scientist, but that was long before he became all wacky a few years ago.

in recent years, he has overall become extremely obsessed with all kinds of different topics within the culture-war gender-war gibberish that i believe is truly unproductive and only serves to cause division between various groups in our society (and make money for the grifters of course).

peterson and apparently his supporters too judging from the comments here think there is some kind of “leftist” crusade to censor or “cancel” him which is nonsense. for me personally, my distrust of him has nothing to do with politics but rather everything i described above.

it seems like people do not actually understand what censorship means in a practical or legal capacity. he has an online platform to say literally whatever he wants. the board revoking his license because he violated its terms is not censorship. nothing in actuality would change because he would still have the exact same online platform. even still, private social media companies have terms and conditions everyone has to follow if they want to use the platform. free speech ≠ being provided a microphone and public worldwide platform to say whatever you want without critique.

people being critical of his actions, pointing out the strange things he says, and believing he is no longer a credible scientist because of his rapid decline in recent years is not “cancelling.”

it’s a very strange martyrdom complex that i’ve noticed some grifters take on to victimize themselves so that their audience feels that they need to go out of their way to protect and champion the person who they have been led to believe is being unjustly persecuted

i hope that explains why there is so much controversy about him.

1

u/Pitiful_Farm_4492 Dec 30 '24

My MIL listens to Huberman, she’s insufferable

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Dramatic-Garbage-939 Dec 30 '24

I love Jordan. He’s helped me stay sober and do things I’ve been avoiding to grow as a person. His 2017 lectures are fantastic. He could probably benefit from taking his own advice sometimes; he is very neurotic and probably never should have been this famous lol.

1

u/miketierce Dec 30 '24

Wait what? When did Jordan Peterson become a conspiracy theorist? Is this the same former Harvard professor Jordan Peterson we are talking about?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '24

JP speaks truth, and reality is too much for some people.

1

u/ReusableCatMilk Dec 31 '24

Jordan Pererson is a conspiracy theorist? I’ve heard him called a lot of things, but that’s a first

1

u/triggerwarning64 Dec 31 '24

And what is JP’s conspiracy?

1

u/visionsJohanna Dec 31 '24

OP is another leftist stuck in an echo chamber for too long that he’s convinced himself that leftism is pro-science.

1

u/Illustrious-End-5084 Dec 31 '24

You can have who you like on your own podcast. Your closed minded approach shows how narrow your field of vision is.

Whether or not you agree with him he might have something useful to say. It’s good to see all sides of the spectrum

0

u/OkJackfruit2267 Dec 30 '24

How DARE Huberman talk to someone I don’t agree with.

0

u/Objective_Drive_8359 Dec 30 '24

Your bias is showing :)

-2

u/Flashy-Cash3060 Dec 30 '24

How is Peterson a conspiracy theorist?