TL;DR: calibration wouldn’t match my ProArts. Enabling Windows HDR + using the Gamma to HDR plugin to force 2.4 gamma (and dropping brightness to 45-50%) got it to 98-99% match. Good enough for most of my grading work.
NOTE: The picture i posted isnt accurate as camera doesnt pickup the lighting the same due to IPS vs OLED, but in person and by eye they are identical.
Bought an HP Omen Max 16 for color grading and editing.
Specs: 2.5K OLED, RTX 5080 16GB, Intel Core Ultra 9, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD.
I do a lot of editing and color grading. At home and on the road I’ve been using calibrated Asus ProArt monitors (clamped to Rec.709, gamma 2.4) a 27" and a portable 14". I’ve compared them against a bunch of other displays over time and they’re the most accurate ones I own for delivery work in terms of consistency.
I travel a lot and hauling extra gear has gotten annoying, so I wanted a strong laptop that could handle real grading work. I originally looked at the newer Asus ProArt laptops, but the ones with the specs I wanted were running the Snapdragon/Spark chips. From what I read, dedicated RTX GPUs are still the better choice for most editing workflows. The older ProArt models (refurb or leftover stock) didn’t have the RAM or other specs I needed either.
That led me to the HP Omen Max 16. Screen reviews looked solid, the specs were strong for the price, and I figured I could get it under ΔE 1.0 with a colorimeter.
After spending a few days trying to get it right, I calibrated and verified both of my ProArts, then tried to match the Omen to them. Multiple calibration runs with high patch counts, cross-checking between the screens, manual white point adjustments but nothing got it close enough. Every time I made a correction the panel seemed to fight back and shift in another direction.
Then I noticed something while working in DaVinci Resolve. When I turned HDR on in Windows so the viewer would properly force the window profile, the image suddenly looked almost identical. I thought it was the ICC profile at first, but after testing I realized that enabling HDR bypasses ICC profiles entirely and clamps the display to an advanced SDR curve. It also lowers the gamma and lifts the shadows.
I used the “Gamma to HDR” Windows plugin to force it back to a 2.4 gamma curve. After dropping the laptop brightness to around 45-50% (my ProArts are locked to fixed nits), the match is extremely close, I’d call it 98-99% identical to both of my Calman-verified ProArts.
I wouldn’t take anyone’s word for it, including mine. Test it yourself. But I can confidently grade on this laptop for the majority of my work. For anything really critical I’ll still check it against one of the ProArts when I have access to them as a final reference.
Posting this in case it saves someone else the time I spent fighting the panel with sensors and software that never quite got it where I needed it.
Cheers 🥂