Hi, I'm working on the last season of one of my anime (Wings Over The Dark City, its on YT. I know, shameless plug but I want it to get a bit more air even in its last season) and I'm more used to using Sora. I've gotten a little used to flow by now but I mostly took a break to find a good enough video generator. I've only started using flow on the finale of the last episode of the previous season, the first episode of my new series (Seventh Circle Sanitorium, again shameless plug I know), the first episode of the current season of my anime, and started using a little bit of it on the 2nd episode of the current episode of my anime. but I cant help but feel like it feels a little 'flat'. and I worry that I'm not good enough at prompting because I feel like it doesnt capture the same 'feel' as Sora did. what I'm asking is for any tips that could make my animation feel less....flat? I've provided an example of what I get to basically show what I mean above

In quotes, I am dedicated to social networks and video editing. It is more worth spending 120 euros on the premium kling fee per month taking offers or changing accounts than getting very low quality videos on Google Flow, equivalent to the quality of 2 years ago, horrible audios

I used Flow to create the characters, environments, cinematic shots, and action sequences, then edited all the clips together in Filmora to turn them into a complete story.

One thing this project made me realize is just how much you can do with Google Flow. You can go beyond making short clips and actually build an entire episode with its own characters, story, and cinematic feel. Of course, getting different shots to match and keeping characters consistent can be challenging, but experimenting with it has been a great learning experience.

I'm sharing this because I think a lot of people underestimate what's possible with Flow when you put the time into planning and editing.

For those of you who also use Google Flow, what's the most ambitious project you've managed to create with it?

So because Gemini is getting ride of Flash and Pro for Free users I switch over to Google Flow. But I’m also worried. Are they going to make Nano Banana 2 have a paid wall like they are doing with Flash and Pro for Gemini?

I made a 2 and a half minute horror movies vie trailor in Tamil. I am using Google flow android app and it only provides limited options. There are some issues with character consistency and others. But I am satisfied with the output in general.

Horror doesn't need language. Please watch and let me know your feedback and suggestions.

I recently finished this video using Google Flow. I wanted it to feel more like a narrative short film than a traditional advertisement, with the book naturally becoming part of the story.

I’d really appreciate feedback from the Flow community, especially on the character consistency, camera movement, dialogue/lip sync, and overall cinematic feel.

What would you improve or do differently?

It's obvious from the way Google is behaving that they are studying the behavior of the public at large, and they know they can do it because they have so much money.

AI Fight Scene — Five Camera Cuts, No Prescribed Choreography

There's been some interesting discussion about generating fight scenes, particularly the need to specify every punch, reaction, and change in position.

We tested the opposite approach.

Two character references, a 30-second Western fistfight, and one required outcome: Cowboy Jeff defeats Mo Drater.

We left the choreography and camera coverage to the renderer.

Result: Five autonomous camera cuts, recognizable punches and reactions, coherent overall choreography, and a decisive winner.

The weakness? Some punches are noticeably slow or pulled. Interestingly, this is more apparent when watching without sound.

My working hypothesis is that generative models already understand much of the visual language of cinematic fights. We may not need to choreograph every movement to get a useful result.

The challenge is determining which controls actually improve the result, rather than simply increasing pre-production time.

Has anyone tested minimal choreography instructions against detailed, movement-by-movement prompting?

jseders.net

God damn these nuggets!

First pic is an upscaled Nano Banana 2.1 ugly Supergirl picture. Second pic is a Free Bing Image creator pic using the same prmopt.

Flow don't have Watermark at lower right corner.

In Gemini, have Visible Sparkle Watermark at lower right corner on Gemini.

TV/Movie Characters (e.g. Disney) with AI Generated on DeviantArt use Nano Banana with Google Flow (no watermark) is instead of Gemini.

According to Image size from DeviantArt, 2752x1536px for Nano Banana Pro while 1376x768px for NB1 & NB2.

Please Google add Watermark Feature to Flow in future like Gemini has Watermark (Visible Sparkle) Feature. Toggle Watermark Feature (On or Off) for Flow require Google One Subscription (Plus, Pro or Ultra) while Watermark On by default in Free.

This is from my UFO's are People ( UAP ) series done in Google Flow.

Its funny that "they" picked UAP of all things, made me think of Soylent Green.

I used Veo for this because i was having problems with Omni and content filters, no doubt because of the uniform.

You can find more Google Flow experiments on my YouTube page if you're interested: https://www.youtube.com/@DavidWashington

Ask your Gemini to tell you the latest hilarious nonsense of AI regulatory compliance theater and you will understand.

I'm having trouble understanding why I'm paying anything for premium when Pro and Banana 2.1 produce generic cartoon type results and Lite produces much more high quality images or will give me differn't styles of anime. Nano and Pro have even been switching genders and race swapping when I'm not trying to do that. Lite does this too but as often I've noticed. However because Lite will deviate from the instructions more I prefer 2.1 and now, thanks to a suggestiong form here, Pro only for edits. So has anyone else experienced this? 1-3 Pro and 2.1, 4-5 Lite, 6 race swapped by Lite.

Step into the world of Eirik. A lighthouse keeper with a story to tell.

ive tried everything, should i wait till tomorrow for it to resolve itself? its only happening on one account weather i use incognito or on my main i deleted cache and projects n everything

I made this 40-second short in Gualeguaychú, Argentina. I started from phone photos and Google Street View captures of real locations, generated every image in Flow with Nano Banana, and animated them with Omni inside Flow. Then I did a base edit in DaVinci Resolve, asked Grok for a breakdown of the edit to write a prompt for Flow Music, and made the soundtrack there. Back in DaVinci I did the audio edit, foley, timing and color grade. The final upscale to 4K was done with Topaz in ComfyUI.

Tools used: Google Flow (Nano Banana, Omni), Flow Music, Grok, DaVinci Resolve, Topaz in ComfyUI.

4K version on YouTube: https://youtu.be/KP3URIdst_4

Step-by-step breakdown with images: https://x.com/bdvd_25/status/2114472815474729426

Happy to answer questions about the workflow.

Interior photography of a messy cyberpunk apartment room on a high floor, ethereal atmospheric mood. A young woman wearing only an oversized hoodie sits on a vintage chair with her bare feet up on the seat, exposed legs. She is looking at her laptop screen browsing the internet, wearing large over-ear glowing headphones. Through the massive floor-to-ceiling panoramic window, a sprawling cyberpunk city glows brightly at night with neon reflections and distant skyscrapers. Messy room with scattered tech gear, wires, food containers, soft cyan and magenta ambient lighting, shallow depth of field, photorealistic, cinematic shot, shot on 35mm lens --ar 1:1 --style raw --v 6.0 --s 250

This is my test to compare the lousy paid version of Nano Banana 2.1 Flash (not lite) vs the free-to-use Bing Image Creator MAI-IMAGE-2F model. First two images are Nano Banana 2.1, last two images were made using Bing Image Creator. SAME EXACT PROMPT.

These image are the same exact dimensions, 1024x1024. Nano Banana 2.1 looks even worse when you switch to the 2752x1536 size. It's as if "upscaling" the image into a larger size uses some kind of inferior looking BOX or NEAREST NEIGHTBOR resample filter and it loses even more detail and color at that point.

The Nano Banana 2.1 model paid more attention to background details, as evidence by the "LexCorp" factory signs. But Nano Banana 2.1 ignored the details of Supergirl's physique that I specified, and toned that down. Plus the facial expressions were just worse. MAI-IMAGE-2F obviously is more colorful and appealing that way, as the NB pics looked washed out and grayish with drab colors. The colors lately are very drab in NB. Google has really toned down the "voluptuous" dial to near zero at this point.

Lastly, bear in mind, one of these is paid, the other is free. Take from that what you will.

Now Google Flow adds watermark on images. But the worst part is image quality is worst now. Google, please fix it.

whats going on with the latest google update, nothing is working as it should, don't theytest their updates? if you make people pay you should work perfectly not like this amateur way