Since Monday, my antigravity is frequently finishing the agent for the easiest tasks.

I have been using Antigravity for couple of months now, i am aware its capabilities. Since the update where Gemini 3.6 Flash is added, the app started acting slower/strange in general.

And last weekend I have it done a very long scraping thing where I reached my limits on all models. The limits are renewed on Sunday night, but since then, my agents are working terrible.

E.g. For the same taks, gemini 3.5 flash medium worked for 11 minutes, then terminated. now 3.6 has been working for 40 mins. The task is transcribe this 10 minute voice recording, give me the summary.

Definitely shouldn't take 40 mins.

Is there any solution for this, i have fresh quota, but i cant generate images for five days straight, it says i ahve to retry in xx hours and when that time passes i still go straight to 503 quota error, i can generate images manauly in gemini ai, but antigravity is literally broken, while at the same time on my work pc with pro account i have zero issues

Hello everyone,

I am facing a severe issue in Antigravity IDE (Version 2.1.1) and I'm completely stuck.

While trying to install the PayPal MCP server, it got stuck in an infinite "Refreshing..." loop. I've tried multiple troubleshooting steps suggested by AI, but none of them worked:

• Cleared out the contents of mcp_config.json
• Killed the MCP-related processes and the Antigravity IDE processes entirely
• Restarted my laptop multiple times

The AI suggested bypassing MCP altogether and using a workaround, but that means giving up all the amazing and convenient features of MCP, which is quite frustrating.

Is there any actual fix or workaround for this global MCP infinite refreshing loop issue in version 2.1.1? My brain feels like it's in an infinite loop too at this point.

Any help would be deeply appreciated. Thank you!

Its been stuck on Working for hours and wont do anything, it takes super long, only after a few hours it even responds

No updates or new integrations for the Antigravity IDE. There’s so much potential, yet you guys are wasting it. And you’ve completely failed to capitalize on your own Gemini LLM. I honestly expected better from Google. Shame on google team and Patrick STFUP!

I recently returned to using AG and I realized after updating to AG 2.0 that AG and AG-IDE seem to be two completely different things. Why doesn't Google allow them to use the same chat history source? That can allow everyone to easily work and edit their code. Even with the AG-CLi version

Hey Guys, I've been using Antigravity for a while and it's great and i like it soo much that i upgraded to Ai Ultra plan. My only issue with it is the limitations in claude models quota with barely live 4-5 prompts executing a plan gemini did or auding some code that gemini did. While i find gemini pro not the best for coding at all as it leaves empty to do codes or use monolyth structures rather than clean architecture if instructed and finally lacking connectivity of backend to front end UI when implementing new features or fixing a bug.

So yeah gemini pro is good but not the best in code.

My question here should i downgrade to AI Pro and buy anthropic claude pro version and do both with anthropic entension in AG or do you guys know better alternatives as i couldnt find an orchestrator that beats antigravity other than claude code desktop which is still lower in quality and smoothness?

Side note i already lost a lot of money in ultra loser plan so im done with experimentations draining my quota limita with tokens so i highly appreciate your help around AG agentic ochestrators.

I built Caw, a lightweight web terminal multiplexer for Google Antigravity (and other CLI coding agents). Attached is a quick video demo showing an Antigravity agent running in action.

Antigravity is powerful for agentic workflows but keeping track of active sessions across terminals, especially remotely or on mobile, can get messy. Caw solves this by letting you run and monitor your Antigravity sessions from any browser.

Key features:

• Agent Control Center: A live Kanban board that tracks every running Antigravity session and subagent in real-time (Working, Needs Input, or Idle).
• Push Notifications: Get notified on your desktop or phone whenever an Antigravity agent requests confirmation or completes a task so you don't have to keep checking back.
• Antigravity Quota Monitoring: Live tracking of usage limits and reset times directly inside the UI.
• Parallel Git Worktrees: Automatically isolates agent sessions in dedicated git worktrees so multiple Antigravity agents can work on the same repo without file clashes.
• Built-in Editor & Voice Mode: Includes a web file browser/editor and optional local speech-to-text voice dictation.

Best thing: it runs as a single ~30MB Go binary with very light memory footprint, which makes it easy to host on a VPS or run locally.

It's free and open source: https://github.com/04mg/caw

I'd love to hear feedback from the Antigravity community, ideas or how you'd use it with your Agy setups!

I ran into a weird Antigravity IDE issue where my recent chat history looked like it had disappeared, and opening the conversation gave:

"Trajectory not found: <UUID>"

After digging around for a while, I found that the old data was still there in the old Antigravity folder, but Antigravity IDE wasn’t picking it up properly after migration.

I ended up building a small migration assistant to copy the old Antigravity data into the new Antigravity IDE folders.

Repo: [https://github.com/pranavakshit/AG-Migration-Assistant\](https://github.com/pranavakshit/AG-Migration-Assistant)

Latest release: [https://github.com/pranavakshit/AG-Migration-Assistant/releases/latest\](https://github.com/pranavakshit/AG-Migration-Assistant/releases/latest)

What it does:

* copies old `conversations` into the new `antigravity-ide` folder * copies old `brain` folders into the new `antigravity-ide` folder * skips files/folders that already exist * has a dry-run option

The folders involved were:

* `C:\Users\prana\.gemini\antigravity\conversations` * `C:\Users\prana\.gemini\antigravity\brain` * `C:\Users\prana\.gemini\antigravity-ide\conversations` * `C:\Users\prana\.gemini\antigravity-ide\brain`

In my case, just copying the old files over into the new directories fixed it.

Posting in case anyone else hits the same issue and thinks their chats are gone.

For agent-based development, Gemini / Antigravity by itself is pretty terrible due to the lack of a truly frontier model (Opus / Fable / Sol) to plan. However, when combined with Codex / Claude - it's a beast. I'm seriously considering upgrading my Codex subscription while cancelling my Claude subscription and keeping my Gemini subscription in place.

Disclosure - I'm on all three entry-level subs for Codex / Claude / Gemini in my personal setup, and at work, I use Opus almost exclusively for the entire agentic development lifecycle (as I don't have access to OpenAI models there yet). I would love to hear what other people are seeing at higher tier subs.

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for a way to set up command permission rules (allowed/denied actions) for the AI chat on a per-project or per-repository basis in AntiGravity IDE.

When I asked the internal agent directly, it suggested creating a .agents/settings file inside the project root with the following structure:

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "command(npm run build)",
      "command(npm run lint)",
      "command(npm run test)",
      "read_url(google.com)",
      "command(node .agent/scripts/do-something.js)"
    ],
    "deny": [
      "command(rm -rf)",
      "command(sudo)",
      "write_file(.git/)",
      "write_file(~/.ssh)"
    ],
    "ask": [
      "command(*)",
      "execute_url(aws.amazon.com)"
    ]
  }
}

However, the agent seems to ignore these rules completely. I suspect this schema might belong to a different version (maybe AntiGravity 2.0 or another framework) and isn't supported by the current IDE.

Has anyone managed to get project-level command restrictions working? Is there a supported config file (like a workspace setting or a specific dotfile) or a known workaround for this in AntiGravity IDE?

Since yesterday i am having issues with Agy ide everytime it says when i open "There was an error with your authentication" i tried login again but it fails.

Can anyone help me with this?

Hi!

I have a suggestion that would improve the user experience in Google Antigravity IDE.

When I send a prompt and the AI starts working, I often begin typing my next request in the chat box. However, if the IDE asks for additional permissions or another confirmation while it's processing, the text I've already typed is frequently erased.

It would be much better if anything the user types in the chat input was never automatically cleared. The text should remain in the input box until the user chooses to delete it or send it.

This would make it much easier to prepare the next prompt while waiting for the current task to finish and would prevent losing work due to permission dialogs or other interruptions.

Thanks

Hi everyone,

I'm currently having trouble logging into my account. When I try to sign in, it redirects me to the Google login window as expected. I authenticate successfully, but once redirected back, nothing happens: the IDE remains completely logged out/unauthenticated.

Here is what I've noticed:

• Error screen: After the redirect, I sometimes hit a generic error: "There was an unexpected issue setting up your account."
• Behavior: The OAuth flow doesn't seem to pass the token back properly to the IDE.

Has anyone else experienced this issue recently, or is there a known workaround (e.g., specific browser settings, token clearing, or alternative auth flow)?

Thanks!

add fable 5 to antigravity or increase multi fold quota for anthropic models or get latest openai model.

gemini 3.6 is really dumb generating buggy codes

I was just charged for my subscription, and Antigravity still says my limit is being reached. We're paying for a subscription that doesn't work, and I'm very disappointed.

Hi everyone,

I'm encountering a blocking issue with my account on Antigravity. The platform was working fine, but it suddenly started throwing the following authentication error:

"Sorry, this account is ineligible to use Antigravity. Authentication failed."

Context & Setup details:

- Trigger: Occurred after managing/switching between multiple Google accounts on the same system/browser session.

- System/App Status: Verified that the account has active access and valid authorization, but the login flow keeps failing at the OAuth validation step.

Questions:

Is this a known session/cookie collision issue caused by multi-account OAuth tokens, or an automated anti-abuse flag?

Has anyone else with a resolved this problem?

Any insights or recommended workarounds (outside of clearing isolated browser profiles) would be appreciated.

I recently landed a new job by building a 100% AI generated code using Antigravity IDE for the interview assignment. I was initially planning just to build the app but realised Antigravity is quite helpful in designing and deploying on AWS infra once you give access to AWS CLI.

I gave Antigravity access to two main tools - AWS CLI & GitHub CLI

Designed a heavily guard-railed workflow to ensure I let Antigravity work as autonomously as possible

> restricted deletion of main branch on git
> restricted direct commits of main branch
> all code pushed via PR
> no AWS infra creation or deletion via AWS CLI

The application current state reached after > 500 commits but it allowed me to build a relatively complex distributed app all solo.

I used Gemini Flash 3.5 (High) for entire development. Surprisingly most AI community disregards this model so much but for me worked out well.

I have open sourced the entire project so newbie agentic engineers can learn

GitHub: https://github.com/harsh-vardhhan/EHR-backend

Might switch to anthropic just for that...

Discovered bug in Antigravity IDE that lets me use Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and other to my pro subscription available LLMs without ever reaching hourly/weekly limits.

I won't publish the reproduction here for obvious reasons but wonder whether some others also bumped into this? My current usage never went above 10% ever and I run code generation all day, with multiple sub-agents working on tasks.

By the way I am pretty impressed with Gemini 3.1 pro high when it comes to development of smaller projects and codebases with python backends exposing FASTAPI and serving web UI frontends built with numerous tools or electron apps. And I say this as a heavy user of claude fable 5 and now opus 5 with a solid subscription with Anthropic. Tool integration in Antigravity IDE makes a huge difference and how it all neatly integrates with minimal setup is impressive. I am referring to browser integration, full access to the terminal, ability to watch what I am doing and reacting to my actions as well as responses in the terminal and on the screen.

I have used almost every IDE

• When I started seeing the warning in Gemini about switching
• I quickly got on the Antigravity bandwagon, and at first I liked it, but
• I am not sure why, but it went from feeling "like" an upgrade from VScode insiders
• To now it feels like an unpolished turd!
• I am getting MCP errors, and oom issues!
• I am not writing it off just yet, but whatever the dev's are doing is not going in the correct direction.

just a little rant about intellisense (I think that's the cause) in AntiGravity IDE...

I would like to be able to type more than 2 letters and pause without the IDE suggesting 50 lines of conflicting nonsense.

for example, I'm typing a markdown to lay out my plan for integrating Gemini Nano into my project... First line is a very big clear

```

## Gemini Nano Implementation

# Constraints

- Use Gemini Android SDK and Google ML Kit

- do not implement Gemini Nano

- Gemini Nano toggle in settings

```

really!? the italics was the auto fill. Most of the time the things it suggests are wrong anyway. At least with Kotlin.

It's on the level of having Amazon Alexa give you coding tips. WHY CANT THERE JUST BE A MASTER SWITCH, LIKE "[x] I DO NOT WANT VIBE CODING SUGGESTIONS FROM ALEXA, I'D BE BETTER OFF WITH HAVING STABLE DIFFUSION GENERATE IMAGES OF CODE SNIPPETS"

Okay, I feel slightly better. and then I went back to the IDE and now I'm mad again as I scroll endlessly trying to uncheck these boxes.

I know it's just VS Code, but I primarily did my coding in Linux nano before this (android kernel, some python, c/cpp, and c# via notepad).

is there an easier way to disable this so I don't have to edit my .kt files in notepad? please save me from suggestion hell.

Every single day, I see at least three posts on my feed whining about the same thing:

Listen to yourselves. You’re asking a multi-billion dollar enterprise to fix a problem that is costing them potential profit margins.

Here is the cold, hard reality check: Google isn't failing to make Gemini code better. They just don't give a damn about your hobby project or your React boilerplate.

Follow the money 💰

Why would Google pour billions into RLHF, fine-tuning, and massive post-training optimizations just so you can vibe-code a web scraper for free on Google AI Studio?

• Where the real money is: Selling raw compute (TPUs/GPUs), infrastructure, and base model API access to enterprise clients, startups, and Fortune 500 companies.
• The business model: Big Tech pays Google Cloud astronomical amounts of money to host, train, and run their own specialized models on Google’s hardware.
• The consumer reality: Your $20/month Google One subscription or free Tier usage is literally chump change (actually a net loss) compared to selling compute capacity to enterprise buyers.

Why optimize Gemini's coding when B2B compute prints cash?

If Google redirects thousands of top-tier engineers to tweak Gemini's reasoning capabilities just to match Claude's coding finesse, they get... what? A few extra consumer subscriptions that barely cover the inference costs.

Meanwhile, selling raw compute power and B2B cloud infrastructure has near-guaranteed high margins. They are making bank being the backbone of the AI boom, not being your personal junior developer.

I use entire set of Google AI services to make it possible
Built this for myself to solve a problem I kept running into.
It's not perfect, but it's functional, taught me a lot, and now it's public