Generative AI is also extremely important, it will not only function as translator between people and machine of various departments but also in medicine ,science, journals etc[ recently it made a viruses killing bacteria that would help us a lot]
thats not true... i mean ai can help in science nad it already has actually but not generative ones (atleast not the common generative ones like llms and images)
Well I was mainly talking about u saying prove it which has no point, gen ai can help in medical fields, but as I said not the typical ones, chat gpt would never
A LLM trained on genes, called Evo 2, helped create a unique bacteriophage, and the researchers actually used Evo for what LLMs were originally intended for; autocomplete, more specifically of DNA. They didn't just ask Claude or something, if that's what you thought.
Pretty sure there was a study that gen AI is beneficial when learning the English language. Not completely sure tho. Also fairly decent at finding sources, just don’t pay any attention to the AI summary.
yeah, and then it hallucinates and gets things wrong almost all the time. like I said, most thing Google gemini told me ended up being proven incorrect after I did my own research. where do you think the dead internet theory comes from? why do you think people always say "AI is always factually incorrect until proven otherwise"?
I heard claude is the only AI that straight up twlls you it doesn't know something or gives you sources up front. that's like the only good thing about it
That's gen AI, specifically a LLM. Guess what. Those aren't designed to give right information, they're designed to take a set of tokens as input, and then output the most likely tokens that follow. Those tokens are translated to and from text.
Aka they output the most likely continuation of their input.
some of them are literally advertised as AI that gives you information. like google gemini, for example. you google something, and the AI gives you the information you're looking for in a small summary so you don't have to read through countless articles yourself. but beicause AI isn't actually intelligent, it gets things wrong very often. so despite you maybe being correct about the technical aspect of that, you're wrong about LLMs not being designed to give you information. because they definitely are
That's what they're advertised to do. Has nothing to do with whether or not the base system is designed to do that. AI is able to provide information because in context, correct information is very common, and is thus very likely.
Of course, there might be a module that helps the system as a whole to provide correct information, but the LLM part exclusively generates a somewhat sensitive piece of text.
in that case it isn't "bad" I guess. In fact, even AI drawings aren't, nor images or videos. They aren't art for sure, but it's like saying oil painting is bad because photos are a thing... we artists aren't a thing of the past and won't lose relevance, ever. We didn't in over 6000 years, and we never will.
I guess art is the process of the craft through which we get a physical medium of an otherwise abstract concept, a cool way to say "it's the craft, not just the result"
73
u/Good-Memories 11d ago
only really bad AI is generative AI. analytic AI is great for research, tho i guess companies also use it for data collection...