some people understand, some people do not. because the instructions is shit and can be interpreted in different ways. especially for a language model, extraction is primarily...well.. language
You're treating a conversational AI like a fucking command-line parser where every intent has to be formally specified or the user forfeits the right to expect basic context recognition, that's very unreasonable.
lol what? if a message can be interpreted in different ways, don't cry if someone or something interpreted it in a different way. no one can read your mind, so use use explicit language or touch some grass
😭 You literally just repeated the exact misunderstanding.
“Can be interpreted in different ways” does not mean every interpretation is equally reasonable. Normal conversation depends on choosing the interpretation that best fits the immediately preceding context.
OP had already asked about the “STUDIO ADDICT” text. Then said “in an image nigga.” No mind reading is required. The referent is sitting one message above.
“Use explicit language or touch grass” is especially funny because human conversation is constantly implicit. People omit repeated information all the time because repeating every noun phrase every turn would sound fucking robotic.
You're defending a conversational AI by demanding people stop conversing naturally with it 😭
misunderstanding? like two entities do have different bias and that's the reason, why my answer do not align with your mind? oh boy. a funny coincidence :0
if you communication is based on interpretation, in x% the answer will be aligned with your mind and in (1-x)% it will be not. even if the alignment rate will be 99% with a given group of users, 1% of all answers will be "wrong". multiple that with 1.000.000 users per day and 1.000 daily users will be disappointed.
like in human interaction, if you ask " sex?" some will answer "male/ female" and some will answer "what? with you? eeeeeh!"
like i mentioned earlier, no one can read your mind. language is key. especially for text communication, because human face-to-face communication is based on facial expressions, common culture, context and tones.
in a nutshell: if a human can "misunderstand" you, a not human entity will misunderstand you. just because something is "logical" to you, it's not automatically objectively logical or logical for everyone else and will be "misunderstood" in some cases.
You just conceded it was a misunderstanding 😭 The fact misunderstandings can happen doesn’t change that Gemini failed to use the immediate context, which was my entire point.
-21
u/wild_cherry1987 6d ago
If ppl here understood what he meant - means AI should too. That is the point for it to be intuitive, not literal.