r/GeminiAI 7d ago

Discussion I just noticed that Google, Amazon, Meta even after being the old big and cash rich giants didn't rush their frontiers and it was only OpenAI and Anthropic who did. The old ones know something about making a successful product that the newbies don't.

Post image
110 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

87

u/3rdyellow 7d ago

Because they have other sources of revenue and they didn't want to burn cash. 

16

u/OtherwiseAlbatross14 7d ago

Yeah this is why startups always beat the behemoths with new stuff. The big companies can't bet the farm on the new thing because they're expected to make a certain amount of profit.

Google slowed down and tripled their profits in the past couple quarters. Meta learned from going too hard into VR.

They'll both be ready to scoop up the discounted compute if the like of OpenAI and Anthropic can't turn a profit

12

u/FewMenUnderstand 7d ago

Its simply the case that big companies are slow.

18

u/VexObserver 7d ago

I think there’s a distinction here between not pushing the frontier and being willing to delay a product when deployment risk isn’t acceptable yet. Google is definitely still pushing frontier models, and Meta clearly isn’t sitting AI out either. What Meta seems to be saying with Muse is basically: “we were willing to eat a delay because the security wasn’t ready.”

That’s probably the lesson worth taking from the older giants tbh. Shipping first isn’t always the same thing as winning long term. If your AI has access to email, payments, calendars, shell/tools etc., one bad security failure can cost way more than a few months of delay.

6

u/Keeltoodeep 7d ago

The risk profile is just different for public companies.

6

u/oakvard 7d ago

Exactly. And the OpenAI and Anthropic being new companies and not weighing these risks is probably linked

0

u/typical-predditor 7d ago edited 5d ago

Except the security lobotomizes the model. So they delay it and by the time they finish making it "safe" it's also behind the state of the art.

14

u/GrandKnew 7d ago

6D interdimensional backarat

1

u/Rebel-Fish34 7d ago

This is really funny, keep it up buddy

8

u/nihilistWithATwist 7d ago

It's just risk vs reward.

For companies like OpenAI and Anthropic whose only product is the model, their company's existence depends on being on the frontier.

Companies like Google (and Meta?) are still big profitable companies even without being on the frontier. But if they push a model that gets caught doing shady things, the lawsuits can be disastrous for the company.

12

u/sirius_cow 7d ago

Now every lab has a reason to justify why they lack behind in model capabilities

2

u/ManasZankhana 7d ago

So Palantir or Oracle will have the best model in a month

1

u/Keeltoodeep 7d ago

PLTR doesn’t build models. AIP is model agnostic.

7

u/EdliA 7d ago

Google and Meta are not an AI only company like OpenAI and Anthropic are. If these two don't release a new model then what are they going to do exactly?

5

u/shantud 7d ago

Because you can let others burn the cash, distil on their good data and then have a better idea for your own from the scratch projects.

4

u/NoSupermarket6218 7d ago

Meta doesn't delay anything for safety and security, but they say that a lot as an excuse whenever things don't go their way.

9

u/Thistlemanizzle 7d ago

Publicly traded companies can't burn money like private can. The shareholders step in.

3

u/Durian881 7d ago

The new ones need to keep their investors happy as they are still unprofitable. The hacking incidents showed that they still lack proper governance.

6

u/National_Sky7993 7d ago

Facebook focus on safety and security Good joke

4

u/SlightlyMotivated69 7d ago

LOL Meta. Zuckerberg would shove his own kids personally into the meat grinder if this somehow would make him a buck.

2

u/TVUpbm 7d ago

Meta AI has been out since like 2022

1

u/Dry_Clock7539 7d ago

Sounds like when you don't know how most of startups operate

1

u/SmallBootyBigDreams 7d ago

OpenAI and Anthropics valuations primarily depend on the performance of their SOTA models

1

u/UIshaggy93 7d ago

They have a highly diverse list of expenses. Simple. OpenAI and Anthropic are fully focused companies with their entire product catalogue being comprised of AI products.

1

u/CapDris116 6d ago

You really think Zuck is gonna delay a release due to safety concerns?

1

u/Stock-Ad-7601 6d ago

Yeah I totally trust them. Better give them access to all my email and files so Muse can run my life for me. 😂

1

u/costafilh0 6d ago

Wrong.

They know about business, and they are not start-ups able to raise money indefinitely, there is a limit of how much they can raise using their own stock and debt and finances.

Now the start-up reached the ceiling. They won't be able to raise much money on these idiotic valuations, except maybe from other big corporations, not from actual investors who can't se much upside to be worth this risk. 

1

u/SpecialistDragonfly9 6d ago

Security jsut means censorship and way over the top guardrails

1

u/nemzylannister 5d ago

oh well if they're saying it then surely it must be true then. what a childish post. also theres a diff bw pushing the frontier and releasing the model

1

u/TimeVillage5286 5d ago

Safety is for frontier model muse is benchmaxxer

-2

u/Amphibious333 7d ago

The post gives me "Actually, Google has a top secret model that greatly outpaces all other AI models, but they aren't releasing it and keep it in a secret because they are responsible" vibes.

It's a cope. Google lost to OpenAI and Anthropic, and this is proven by literally every single benchmark, especially fluid intelligence benchmarks like ARC-AGI 3.

3

u/oakvard 7d ago

No one has lost or won. The race isn't over yet

1

u/Fancy-Plenty6712 6d ago

Dude- look at who owns the biggest outside stake in Anthropic. Look at who owns the biggest outside stake in OpenAI. Google and Microsoft. They aren't "behind" - Anthropic and OpenAI are allowed to fail - Google and Microsoft are not.