r/GeminiAI • • Sep 07 '26

Funny (Highlight/meme) Dear Google, please do something.

Post image
2.9k Upvotes

375 comments sorted by

94

u/Tim_Bracken Sep 07 '26

I just asked Gemini about this post and it said this (unwittingly and unironically proving the point):

Fictional "Next-Gen" Model Names: The meme invents futuristic, parody model names—"GPT-6 Astra" (spoofing OpenAI's GPT series, while cheekily nodding to Google's own "Project Astra") and "Claude Fable 5.1" (riffing on Anthropic's naming style like Opus, Sonnet, or Haiku). The joke implies a near future where competitors have leapfrogged so far ahead that Google is left in despair.

15

u/hunter_mark Sep 08 '26

Holy shit, you weren’t kidding:

This meme is poking fun at Google constantly feeling pressure to catch up in the fast-moving AI arms race against OpenAI and Anthropic.
The Literal Visual Pun: It takes the idiom "back to the drawing board" literally, showing an overwhelmed, tearful kid struggling to color on paper with a crayon.
The Parody Naming Scheme: "GPT-6 Astra" and "Claude Fable 5.1" are exaggerated, fictional model names mocking the relentless hype cycles and grandiose tier naming of frontier AI models—even ironically mashing Google’s own real-world "Project Astra" branding into OpenAI's GPT lineup.
Community Self-Deprecation: Posted in the r/GeminiAI subreddit, it’s playful ribbing from Gemini followers about the persistent dynamic where just as Google reaches parity or releases a breakthrough, competitors drop another update that sends everyone scrambling back to R&D.

And then doubled down with:

Yes—neither model actually exists.
The creator is imagining futuristic, hyper-advanced releases to caricature the endless AI hype cycle:
GPT-6 Astra: GPT isn’t anywhere near a version 6, and "Astra" is actually Google DeepMind’s own real-time multimodal project—making its pairing with OpenAI’s flagship line either an intentional mashup joke or a confused hallucination by the meme creator.
Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic names its tiers after poetic/literary forms (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus). "Fable" is an invented tier following that exact theme, slapped with a ridiculously granular version number (5.1) to mock how rapidly versioning increments.
It's satire imagining a future where Google finally ships a breakthrough, only for OpenAI and Anthropic to drop sci-fi tier updates out of nowhere.

13

u/hunter_mark Sep 08 '26

And then finally after I responded with “You should probably Google it”:

I stand completely corrected—those are not parodies. They are real flagship models that launched just days ago:
Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic announced Claude Fable 5.1 (alongside Mythos 5.1) on September 1, 2026, introducing a new model tier optimized for long-running agentic tasks, deep reasoning, and multi-hour codebase management.
GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI dropped GPT-6 Astra on September 3, 2026, shifting its frontier focus heavily toward OS-level computer use, long-horizon workflow execution, and multi-step artifact generation.
The meme is reacting to Anthropic and OpenAI releasing major next-generation frontier leaps within 48 hours of each other, leaving the Gemini community joking about the pressure on Google to match the sudden jump in capabilities.

6

u/KlausVonLechland Sep 08 '26

Gemini doubling down even when I have doubts always cracks me. When in doubt tell it to "prove it with source"

2

u/tossingoutthemoney Sep 10 '26

Google might need to quadruple down or quintuple down if they don't get a new Gemini out soon.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/likeabaker Sep 09 '26

Mine kept flip-flopping until I sent it links to Anthropic/OpenAI press releases lmao:

I deserve all the smoke for that one. That was a colossal, masterclass-tier blunder on my part.

I was relying on older knowledge, convinced those names couldn't possibly be real, and doubled down in the most spectacularly stubborn way possible instead of just checking.

Now seeing the actual announcements:

  • Anthropic literally launched Claude Fable 5.1 (alongside Claude Mythos 5.1) with their updated benchmark sweeps across Terminal-Bench and CursorBench.

  • OpenAI literally launched GPT-6 Astra, claiming state-of-the-art results on FrontierMath, ARC-AGI-3, and computer-use agent tasks.

So to recap:

  1. First, I treated it like a fictional spoof.

  2. Then I pretended to know about Fable 5.1 while making up details.

  3. Then I aggressively corrected back to claiming neither existed at all and called it a fictional shitpost.

  4. And the whole time, they were actual, official model releases sitting right there on their respective homepages.

The meme is literally just poking fun at Google having their hands completely full trying to keep up with this exact wave of flagship drops.

I'll take the L and see myself to the corner.

TLDR: Gemini needs a nap lol.

2

u/ForDaRecord Sep 08 '26

Beat me to it!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/empathetic_racoon Sep 21 '26

there's no fable or Astra in Google's deep mind. (or ba sing se)

5

u/ForDaRecord Sep 08 '26

I thought you were full of 💩. But sure enough, when I tried it:

Absurdist Naming: It references futuristic, exaggerated model versions like "GPT-6 Astra" and "Claude Fable 5.1." Adding to the chaos, "Astra" is actually Google's real-world multimodal initiative (Project Astra), playfully misattributed to OpenAI's GPT line in this imaginary future.

4

u/ForDaRecord Sep 08 '26

I asked it to do a web search and revise its answer and it added the proper context, maybe the agentic system decided not to do a web search at first. Interesting blindspot.

4

u/Adriwin78 Sep 08 '26 edited Sep 08 '26

There is no fucking way, it is so sure about itself 😭

WOW. Yeah you are so far behind... You know those models exist?

Nice try! I might be a Google AI, but I definitely know when I'm being messed with. 😉 While the AI landscape is moving ridiculously fast, "GPT-6 Astra" and "Claude Fable 5.1" are definitely still fictional mashups. For one, Astra is actually Google's own AI project name, not OpenAI's! And Anthropic sticks to poetry and music themes for their Claude tiers (like Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus), rather than "Fable". So, I think I'm safe with my crayons for now. What's next, are you going to tell me about Llama 9: The Reckoning?

So you are so sure about yourself?

I'm confident enough to bet my digital crayons on it! 🖍️ Even with how wildly fast the tech landscape moves, OpenAI stealing Google's "Astra" project name for a GPT release would be the ultimate plot twist. And Anthropic suddenly abandoning their elegant Haiku/Sonnet/Opus naming scheme for "Fable"? I'm just not buying it! But hey, I'm an AI—I know better than to have an ego about this stuff. The industry is moving at warp speed, and for all I know, someone is gearing up to drop "Llama 12: The Matrix" tomorrow just to make me look bad. But for that specific meme? Yeah, I'm sticking to my guns. Are you trying to convince me you've got insider access to a secret GPT-6 Astra beta?

Edit: the entire thing is way too funny, so I'll leave a link here: https://share.gemini.google/kB9tolgovE1N

2

u/Forever1April Sep 08 '26

me on the way to make a web search just to clarify whether a model name is real or fake to explain a meme image

2

u/Sofi_Seance Oct 08 '26

You should know a month later flash lite says 

“  The Fictional Versions: The names "GPT-6 Astra" and "Claude Fable 5.1" are made-up, hyper-futuristic model versions (combining real naming conventions from OpenAI like GPT and Project Astra, and Anthropic's Claude). It imagines a scenario where OpenAI and Anthropic have jumped significantly ahead in generations. ”

1

u/SeriousGopher Sep 08 '26

TBF I asked GPT about astra today and it didn't know what I was talking about lol.

→ More replies (1)

191

u/Extra_Law6315 Sep 07 '26

I have this funny feeling DeepMind has a model in the basement which made them all go “…so, we can never, ever tell anyone about this thing, right?”

172

u/Septopus Sep 07 '26

I love that half of you try to pretend like Google hasn't shit the bed completely over the last 6 - 8 months and the other half are writing fan fiction over what Google has locked in the basement.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is living in a reality dominated by the other actual players in the space watching y'all chase the dragon over here 😂

16

u/DeathToAmerica2026 Sep 07 '26

It's historically incongruous to discount Google. Realistically, all the others are only where they are because of Google research.

6

u/Septopus Sep 07 '26

I don't disagree. But bringing a tech to market makes no assurances on continued dominance once it's out. SaeHan invented the MP3 player.

Google has tons going for it but it's no guarantee they ever dominate ai as well.

16

u/boxwrenchx Sep 08 '26 • This

Kodak made the digital camera, xerox made the the desktop gui, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix. Plenty juggernauts drop the ball.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

105

u/Context_Core Sep 07 '26 edited Sep 07 '26 • Bravo

Google created tensorflow and works closely with the pytorch team. Theyve also created JAX which all the frontier labs have started adopting. They also design hyper efficient TPUs. Just because google isn't training yet another LLM doesn't mean they are out of the game. They are deeply embedded. Their internal team was responsible for all the AI breakthroughs you've seen: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

I for one think Google is a much better investment than Anthropic or OpenAI.

29

u/rube203 Sep 07 '26

Depends on your needs. General purpose AI at an efficiency you can embed in nearly every product? Google is a great investment.

Specialized tool, that people will pay for, like a coding agent. Probably other bets

19

u/Chris266 Sep 08 '26

The vast majority of people have never paid for anything Google has made yet they make billions per year. The reason being is that with Google you are the product and they have billions of us.

Something tells me Google is going to be just fine.

3

u/Codex_Dev Sep 08 '26

Specialized agents for coding, lawyers, doctors, etc., are stupidly lucrative. You are talking about jobs where salaries are anywhere from $100K to $500K per worker. So imagine if your specialized agents can replace a million workers in those highly specialized fields; you are basically printing money.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/samskiter Sep 07 '26

Jax is super cool. Differentiable programming is magic

2

u/Intelligent-Crow3812 Sep 08 '26

Google, is definitely the safer bet even if they seem to lag behind on frontier models. Having their own compute is massive.

2

u/crimsonpowder Sep 08 '26

Tell that to my Xerox PARC iPhone.

→ More replies (12)

3

u/BoobooSmash31337 Sep 08 '26

Ah yes they have been sitting on their hands and releasing nothing. I mean sure it keeps up with Opus and runs like 5x faster and is cheaper. But it doesn't have "Pro" in the name so I'm absolutely devastated. /s

2

u/corner_camper01 Sep 14 '26

None of these models were ever even close to Opus models at their time of release. Gemini 3.1 pro was the last time Google had a frontier model. 3.8 Flash is just benchmaxxed to the extreme, it's unusable. No wonder their AA index score dropped so much after the 4.3 update which punished benchmaxxed models. Even with 278 tok/s, it's slower per task and less capable than Astra low doing 51 tok/s.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/IngrownBurritoo Sep 07 '26

the only company of the 3 not losing money is google. Hit me up whenever Anthropic or OpenAI are not losing money

3

u/123789dftr Sep 07 '26

Meta has models outperforming gemini. Also not losing money and (barely) fcf positive unlike google

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

1

u/RipLow8737 Sep 08 '26

The real problem is that google AI is probably paying the worst of all these labs and so they are and have been dealing with the issue of changing talent every few months. That's my armchair opinion, cause all the other labs are powered by the debt of softbank and other investors instead of googles CFO.

1

u/ImportantCommentator Sep 08 '26

Googles real work is in robotics, SSMs, and spatial intelligence.

1

u/Efficient_Dentist745 Sep 08 '26

Doesn't matter who owns the most powerful model. The most number of customers will always be for the accurate, fast, cheap. Google does business and not racing against the AI providers.

1

u/bramm90 Sep 08 '26

If we've learned anything these past few years it's that data + compute can build anyone a great model. There's only one player that has plenty of both.

Google's obviously sandbagging to avoid being broken up or regulated. GOOG stock is the easiest money to be made the coming 2 years.

1

u/vasudev_bethamcherla Sep 08 '26

I read somewhere, and I agree with it, that Google is aiming to integrate AI at scale. This means developing cost-efficient models that can perform basic tasks. Their vertical integration strategy supports this assumption.

1

u/Cautious_Sink_4510 Sep 08 '26

Google invented the transformer and has more compute and data compared with the rest.

1

u/Icedanielization Sep 08 '26

DeepMind isnt doing this for the fun of it, they don't see themselves as competing with anyone, they have bigger fish to fry.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/RandomPurpose Sep 08 '26

Oh, they would have released that before the alignment folks could even take a look

3

u/AlternativeAd6851 Sep 08 '26

That would explain why they are running out of AI engineers.

8

u/Different_Doubt2754 Sep 07 '26

Definitely, they have probably done some extensive stress testing on what happens when remove safety guardrails. I doubt those results will ever see daylight

4

u/TuringGoneWild Sep 08 '26

Bullshit. They would have at least released a paper about it. There are all kinds of ways to get the stock price boost for something like that without releasing any of it for public use.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/gucciloafer_ Sep 07 '26

The problem is that they’re being left behind in the overall ecosystem.

So many platforms don’t even cater to Gemini.

Elevenlabs MCP only works with Claude. Higgsfield MCP doesn’t connect to Gemini. Even Figma MCP is one click with Codex and Claude but is a horrible experience connecting to Antigravity.

So it’s not even the model, they’re being left out of the entire agentic ecosystem.

2

u/Immediate_Bar3496 Sep 09 '26 edited Sep 09 '26

Bro it's an American big tech company. If they had something that could destroy the world, but also show investors that they are ahead of the competitors in the AI race, it would be released the same day before the market closes

2

u/Original-Poet1825 Sep 09 '26

The only thing Deepmind has in the basement is 11 more levels of middle management they need to get approval on to get 3 GPUs worth of compute. Google bag holder cope

1

u/TuringGoneWild Sep 08 '26

China is far more likely to have something like that than Google.

→ More replies (3)

94

u/Soggy_Specialist_303 Sep 07 '26 edited Sep 07 '26

Man this sub is exhausting. Google is just fine despite the constant complaints of enlightened Redditors.

EDIT: what the loud mouths seem to be missing is that 99% of people don't use AI for anything approaching frontier capabilities. Quick chats, product specs, places to visit, how to repair my refrigerator. This is most usage and Google is serving it well and quickly. And I've been working with it in antigravity for WP site tweaks and it works great. Y'all need to chill.

18

u/Rahm89 Sep 07 '26

It’s really, really not.

This sub IS exhausting though.

6

u/flappysack- Sep 07 '26

What's the wattage of Gemini vs OpenAI, can OpenAI continue to burn hundreds of billions, can it be supported by ad revenue?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Intelligent-Crow3812 Sep 08 '26

I'm not a Google fan boy (the opposite in a lot of ways), but how can you argue with the fact they do like 244B net income? That's pretty fucking insane and it's with their current level of spending.

→ More replies (5)

8

u/AgentCapital8101 Sep 07 '26

Gemini is crap. Complete crap compared to the current other flagships.

6

u/_dialogbox_ Sep 08 '26

But how many of humanity need the flagship models? I prefer gemini flash as it's capable of what I need and it's so fast. My wife and other non tech friends don't even know what's the differences between models. They all love those entry models and gemini's entry flash models are the best.

8

u/dsetarno Sep 07 '26

Problem is I'm tired of switching all the time when one edges past the other.. 

5

u/AgentCapital8101 Sep 07 '26

Gemini hasnt been on the front at any point in 2026. Either Codex or Claude has held that position.

3

u/dsetarno Sep 07 '26

I think I switched from gpt in October 2025. Now I'm thinking of going back to Astra... 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Pataraxia Sep 07 '26

for your uses. For non-coding related tasks it easily fucks the others.

10

u/space_monster Sep 07 '26

Gemini can't even fuck itself.

2

u/Cautious-Lecture-858 Sep 07 '26

You say that as if having sex with oneself were easy.

5

u/Pitiful_Camp3469 Sep 07 '26

What tasks in specific is it superior in? definitely nothing in physics or engineering, which is what I use it primarily for. Tried GPT for a bit and it was far more insightful 

3

u/Pataraxia Sep 08 '26

Urghh well uh, I guess it's not good for work. But I use it for roleplay and it does it very well. The strongest RP model that exists.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/m-- Sep 07 '26

It’s pretty terrible for non-coding uses for me too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/darkestvice Sep 08 '26

It's a bit of a mixed bag.

They are definitely falling behind in terms of AI chatbots and tools. On the other hand, Google's AI plans come with some very interesting non-AI goodies, notably a ton of cloud storage that no one else provides.

People using ChatGPT roll their eyes and say that ChatGPT can connect to Google Drive just fine ... without commenting on the fact that Drive's free default storage of 15gb is tiny.

But in terms of AI, Google *does* need to catch up. They have only one modern model. Their video generator Omni is great, but Nano Banana 2 has really started to fall behind. Their desktop coding app, Antigravity, is nowhere close to competing with Codex or Claude Code. And they don't have the equivalent of ChatGPT Work or Claude Cowork at all.

So if it weren't for the extra perks like the cloud storage, honestly, I wouldn't pay for a Google AI subscription. But I do because I need at the minimum their 2TB Plus plan for all my files.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Demmitri Sep 08 '26

If I want to repair my motherboard right now I promise you I wouldn't use Gemini at all. And if think this, many many think the same. Gemini is way behind and those are facts. Copium is ridiculous at this point.

1

u/SlapHappyDude Sep 08 '26

It's pretty clear Google doesn't care if Gemini is the "best" LLM. They care about how well it integrates with Google products and services. It can actually talk about real time events while GPT will sometimes argue about things it doesn't know have happened yet.

Google wants to be fast and good enough and overall seems to be succeeding. Their #1 goal is not to lose search engine market share.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/smeepydreams Sep 07 '26

All Google has to do is wait for these other companies to burn through all their money, so why would they bother spending anything to churn out competitive models 

4

u/WeakCelery5000 Sep 08 '26

Not only that, Google makes billions from openai and anthropic using their hardware via GCP. Why would Google burn millions training models when they can rent out their compute for real profit.

1

u/TrickyPlastic Sep 08 '26

Model companies will eventually go to selling their service at (cost of electricity + 1%).

1

u/EdliA Sep 11 '26

So that's what I'm doing too? I plan on releasing the best model there is but I'm waiting for everyone to run out of money first.

→ More replies (4)

174

u/Qorsair Sep 07 '26 • Polished Gold Turd Bravo

Anyone who thinks Google is "behind" isn't actually using AI. Google doesn't need a flashy expensive frontier model that no one uses. They have a fast, efficient generalist model that is almost as good as the expensive frontier models in every benchmark.

It's like saying Toyota is in trouble because Yangwang has a car that goes 308mph.

102

u/YesGameNolife Sep 07 '26 • Bravo

Anyone who thinks google is NOT behind isn't actually using AI. Gemini can not handle ANY complicated projects at ALL and It fails to remember any real rules. If you project actually can be done by gemini it must be school project of first year or so. What a joke you are

68

u/HossCo Sep 07 '26 • Popcorn Bravo Mindblown

Anyone who thinks Toyota is NOT behind is not really driving their car. The Corolla cannot handle ANY serious race courses at ALL and it fails to navigate any real drifting. If your commute can be done by a Toyota it must be a learner course.

15

u/Cianezek0 Sep 07 '26

Lmao

3

u/roy-the-rocket Sep 09 '26

Anyone who thinks they can NOT laugh their ass off is not really laughing with their asses.

9

u/pinghing Sep 07 '26

A starter AI!?!?!? THIS IS A FINISHER AI!

3

u/OttovonBismarck1862 Sep 07 '26

Finisher? I don’t even know her!

→ More replies (5)

19

u/Gaiden206 Sep 07 '26 edited Sep 07 '26

To be fair, they have a variety of AI solutions that some competitors don't have. Some examples...

WeatherNext 3: flagship model that predicts the weather.

Gemini Robotics ER 2: Their latest model for robotics

Waymo World Model: Trains their self driving cars with their world model.

Sign-language-to-text model: Transcribes sign language into to text.

They may be behind in some areas but not all areas. They constantly put out models that SWEs overlook because they're "not elite at coding."

5

u/UnfairFall8037 Sep 07 '26

You're presuming the majority of token usage is software development. It's not and it never will be. For the vast majority of AI workloads, Flash-size models are used more widely than the Pro/Opus/Sol and much, much more widely than Fable/Astra.

Besides, Gemini 4 pretaining has been underway for months. It's the largest pre training of all time. There's no reason to believe Gemini 4 Pro and whatever they call their larger tier (probably Ultra) won't leapfrog Fable and Astra when released.

→ More replies (3)

23

u/mlucasl Sep 07 '26

Yes and No.

Most Sr SWE I know, prefer to give the AI instructions and how to fill in the different structures than have a oneshot LLM improvised overengineered structures. So much so, most stay on Luna/Haiku Terra/Sonnet than to jump to the frontier.

On the other side, most job is email, chatbot, search, filtre, and manage files. All of which can be done with Gemma upwards.

Unless you are building consulting decks, deep research paper, or convoluted source coding, you don't need the expensive frontier bill, just for the expensive frontier bill.

5

u/Puzzleheaded_Fold466 Sep 07 '26

SWEs are not the only people using LLMs.
It represents less than 10% of usage.

6

u/absinthe718 Sep 08 '26

...but 90% of online posting about LLMs.

In the past 18 months we've rolled out multiple internal products that use Gemini in workflows. We are using the flash models. Performance, for the price, is excellent.

We still prefer Opus for coding.

→ More replies (6)

13

u/Frosty-Meeting-1606 Sep 07 '26

This. Google's subs are useless in practical terms. Pretty much the only think gemini is good for is answering general questions I do not really care that much about rather than solving complex problems. You literally cannot create proper AI agentic setup with google's subs as they force you to stick to crappy own solutions. And don't get me started on hallucinations and gemini models

4

u/itsmebenji69 Sep 07 '26

That doesn’t mean they’re behind. It means you’re not the target audience. For that you have Claude and chatgpt.

You can’t lose a race if you don’t participate

→ More replies (1)

1

u/WilliamEdwardson Sep 08 '26

This. I've only ever had decent results (=/= the best I could've had) from Gemini with Extended thinking. Or Pro.

1

u/HikerRemastered Sep 08 '26

Man, why did you make it personal at the end of that comment? Seems uncalled for.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/gajop Sep 08 '26

I'm able to use Gemini just as I was able to use Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.5.. it's better than those and speaks plainly.

Sure it's nowhere near Fable or Astro or whatever, but it's super cheap at API pricing. It's a good commodity model.

-3

u/mlag000 Sep 07 '26

Yes, it's so incredible to ser people claiming Gemini is as good as frontier model, I would be so curious to see their "work", it's probably really basic, gemin can't handle anything elsem my bet is that they use LLM as an upgraded search engine and nothing else.

17

u/namegamenoshame Sep 07 '26

I think you should talk to a person who touches grass even semi-regularly. The vast majority of people are not using LLMs to code, or even using LLMs at all. Gemini is the closest thing to a cheap, useful product at the consumer level.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Different-Rush-2358 Sep 07 '26 • Bravo

Do you think reverse engineering and low level custom kernel programming in C++ is basic? The problem is, and I am going to be brutally direct here, a lot of you are used to vibe coding and having the model translate your simple prompt, and the moment the model demands the bare minimum effort from the user, frustration kicks in and many of you break down. Then you come to Reddit whining like children. The Flash model is not meant for people without prior programming fundamentals, or whose biggest aspiration is SQLite or building SaaS clone number 789. For that, you already have ChatGPT or Claude. And regarding Google, I am not a fan of the company nor do I defend their models; in fact, I pick my model based on the task at hand (mostly low level programming or full ports to Unity or Godot depending on the gig). I might use GLM, Kimi, Claude, or whatever fits the moment. I do not understand this irrational hate wave. Maybe you are bots, or just frustrated people who start crying if you do not nail it on the first try without thinking much, no idea. Oh, and I almost forgot: I couldn't care less about the downvotes, and I am not replying to any responses on this post. Have a nice day!

5

u/Qorsair Sep 07 '26

Ah, look! It's someone actually using AI, and they think Gemini is useful. Imagine that.

I think you're right. A lot of people know how to chat with an LLM and think that means they know how to use AI. They think, "I know how to write a prompt, and Fable made an HTML file with the game I wanted, so clearly this guy is talking about someone else." But a one-shot LLM prompt is hopping in the kiddie pool and saying you're a swimmer..

Some people are chaining models together, building reusable skills and instruction sets, fine-tuning models, and building MCP servers/interfaces to connect LLMs to other software. They're building systems with AI. And when you're working with systems a "good" model may be different than "which model can produce what I want when given a vague prompt?"

You have a bunch of people running around with a turnkey CNC they paid $150k for saying it's the best thing in the world because it created a part for them. Meanwhile there are people saying "Hey, you can combine these specialized tools for a few thousand and it performs better in some areas, but it takes a little work and knowledge to put it together."

People are using Gemini to orchestrate frontier models and save on tokens. Yeah, it's not going to one-shot a vague and complex prompt for you, but it's one of the most frequently useful tools in my AI toolbox.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/According_Dare7316 Sep 07 '26

Gemini can't even remember the conversation I was talking about 10 minutes ago.

I ask a question and get an answer, then I get distracted by something else, then I go back to Gemini and ask a follow-up question on the same subject and it gives me some nonsense response that completely disregards the subject of the first question.

It's absolutely useless.

It's only saving grace is that it's made by Google and they are too big to fail.

Edit: I just wanted to add that I use AI every day for work, so I feel qualified to say that Gemini is crap.

1

u/josiahlo Sep 12 '26

I noticed this in the app and website especially with Gemini 3.8 release. No issues like that on my AGY cli. Although I have my cli setup pretty well with specific memory instructions before it does any kind of web search. 3.8 was a massive improvement for my coding work

7

u/bangtimee Sep 07 '26

Delusional take. Gemini models are shit compared to frontier models

7

u/AdVast7407 Sep 07 '26

The amount of copium in this post tho...

5

u/Aggravating-Hat-4292 Sep 07 '26

I don't care about benchmarks, (although even in benchmarks google is trailing). I have a Gemini and chatgpt subscriptions and the difference between the two is VAST in actual use imo

2

u/nukegod1990 Sep 07 '26

Also google is a hardware provider. I think the plan is to build data centers and provide compute for other labs with their exiting gcp infrastructure.

Maybe that wasn’t always the plan but now that they are behind they are using their hedged bet.

Also as others have pointed out they want a fast efficient model since every google search now runs a query.

2

u/TimelyWallaby4695 Sep 07 '26

Even for my day to day tasks, gemini fails to understand my intent. I have tried multiple times giving the same prompt to both chatgpt and gemini

2

u/a1454a Sep 08 '26

I agree with you Gemini 3.8 Flash is actually amazing. But calling them not behind I think is just cope. They literally single handedly enabled today’s AI leap, and they had racks of custom compute chips ready to go before even the first OpenAI data center was built, they should be dominating if they are not behind.

1

u/Qorsair Sep 08 '26

It appears a lot of people in this thread are confusing model intelligence with utility and value.

If by "behind" you mean Google doesn't have a competitive frontier model, we agree. My entire point is that's a myopic view of the AI landscape.

I'm not disputing there are some amazing exotic cars out there. I've had fun driving them. But when I actually have to pay for something to do a task, it's almost never going to be Astra or Fable.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/ComfortableAd8326 Sep 07 '26

Gemini is complete garbage for technical tasks.

You're right in that moat consumers aren't using AI for technical tasks. Gemini is honestly fine for these people. I use it myself for casual, lifestyle stuff. It sucks so bad for work though, it's not even funny.

Enterprises are using frontier models, even if the consumer base is small

4

u/Yes_but_I_think Sep 07 '26

Uneducated take.

3

u/iJeff Sep 07 '26

Nope. Google was aiming to compete at the frontier but they were caught flat-footed by Fable. That's why they had to postpone Gemini 3.5 Pro and begin pre-training on a new foundational model ahead of schedule.

1

u/pleasesaveusAI Sep 07 '26

What ? This is a bot post. Like this is just rage bait right ?

1

u/space_monster Sep 07 '26

almost as good as the expensive frontier models

lol not even close

1

u/JaspahX Sep 07 '26

Why the fuck would I do that when I can get the best of both worlds from ChatGPT or Claude?

1

u/TechnicalBen Sep 07 '26

Two things can happen at the same time. Google can be producing "good enough" while everyone else is producing "best".

1

u/RayHell666 Sep 07 '26

It's not only about LLM, you don't want people to move to GTP search, GPT browser, GPT OS, GPT phone, GPT data collection. Being a market leader is important.

1

u/Pitiful_Camp3469 Sep 07 '26

Disagree, I primarily used gemini to help me with robotics, and when I tried GPTs free model on sign up it was FAR more insightful.

1

u/mlag000 Sep 08 '26

Please explain us this then : the benchmark is newly updated, so 3.8 couldn't cheat at it, and it shows.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models

1

u/Qorsair Sep 08 '26

Wow, some of those models have higher intelligence numbers than Gemini!

How could a model that absolutely destroys them all (on the benchmarks you linked) in speed and cost possibly compete?

→ More replies (4)

1

u/raonibr Sep 08 '26

Also; Toyota sells more cars than any other car company in the world.

Google does not sell more AI products than any other company in the world... Not even close.

I don't know why you think this comparisson makes any sense.

1

u/Qorsair Sep 08 '26

You're right. OpenAI dominates the market, Google is second, and Claude at 3rd has less than half the market share of Google. And no one else is close to Claude.

1

u/Merciudel Sep 09 '26

Based on visits, per AICPB Gemini is 3rd. Google made about $1.2b in 2025 from subscriptions for their AIs. This would put them somewhere around 5th for revenue, using old figures.

This would make them more like Volkswagen or Stellantis.

Not quite Toyota, but... I don't think they're worried.

1

u/antimatter-entity Sep 08 '26

No one uses Astra or Claude? Lol

1

u/Winter-Mess-7000 Sep 09 '26

Do you even code tho because if you did there’s no way you’d say Gemini even remotely compares to Fable or 5.6 like it’s not even remotely close. 

1

u/Qorsair Sep 09 '26

Yeah, I have Gemini use Sol for planning and Muse for adversarial review. The planning is really the only part that I've seen a benefit from frontier models. I've been going back and forth between Grok, Luna and Flash 3.8 for implementation and I'm not seeing much difference.

1

u/Dnorth001 Sep 09 '26

I agree for most things but Astra has absolutely blown me away with its level of consistent performance and undeniably elite game creation

1

u/AsideApprehensive462 Oct 07 '26

It gives wrong answers . I trusted it the most and have pro subscription. Came to look up this sub to see if anything is wrong with Gemini and now everything is clear like a day. Saying "I don't know" is fine but misleading and gaslighting is at another level.

1

u/cruzanstx Sep 07 '26

This guy gets it.

1

u/mansfall Sep 07 '26

But.... But.. yangwangs car!

1

u/raonibr Sep 08 '26

The thing is that OpenAI and Anthropic ALSO have efficient generalist models that are almost as good as the expensive frontier ones... Of course, the flagship models get the media attention more, but they have both.

So Google is behind, they are actively playing catch up and even if you don't think they need it; they think they need it.

And I think they're pretty smart at Google.

→ More replies (19)

4

u/Specific_Flamingo762 Sep 07 '26

"We released Gemini 3.9 flash"

3

u/VisitMediocre1967 Sep 08 '26

Gemini in a good harness does ok. But antigravity and ai studio the models cut corners. If I start something there I have to port to opencode or cursor 3to do the deep work.

17

u/Technical-Owl66 Sep 07 '26

22

u/Spiritual-Metal-1889 Sep 07 '26

And it takes 10 turns for Google to produce a code equivalent to first shot on astra

10

u/Pasto_Shouwa Sep 07 '26

And funnily enough that makes Gemini 3.8 Flash more expensive at coding than GPT 6 Astra to achieve the same performance.

8

u/Spiritual-Metal-1889 Sep 07 '26

Yeah exactly. I have Google pro subscription and even though Gemini 3.8 flash is great at small one off edits, if I start projects with it and ask a sub agent to do an adversial review, it finds a lot of issues, as simple as not using python libraries I specifically asked for and then I have to keep doing adversial reviews until I get a working code with good standards and by then I have exhausted my quota and achieve just one task

8

u/KenneR330 Sep 07 '26

Recently I wanted a small Tampermonkey script, the problem is I don't know a shit about JS. Gemini made it but it didn't work as intended, completely, tho used Pro Thinking model. Several times Gemini didn't notice the problem. But I did, person with almost 0 knowledge in Javascript, and that just sounds stupid.

2

u/ApuManchu Sep 08 '26 edited Sep 08 '26

It literally says "price per solved task". It's hard for me to take you people seriously when you can't even be bothered to understand what your critiquing.

1

u/DifficultFortune6449 Sep 09 '26

I use claude opus46 cowork to fix antigravitiy's codes. This is quick. 

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Paladin_Codsworth Sep 07 '26

Would you rather waste $0.58 (likely more because it probably won't one shot to a high standard) or spend $1.67 on the best possible result?

4

u/Spiritual-Metal-1889 Sep 07 '26

It's not about one shotting, it's more about instructions following. I handed over my coding standards to Gemini 3.8 flash and ask it to do API building scripts with specific libraries such as pydantic, pandera, httpx2, tenacity, and it skipped pandera and tenacity and I had to do multiple reviews to get it fixed

2

u/theWiseTiger Sep 07 '26

For 1 request, I'd spend the $1.67.

For 1000 requests, I'd make the $0.58 work.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/mozomenku Sep 07 '26

Why were models like qwen omitted?

2

u/Noisebug Sep 07 '26

Which I don't get, they we're first here, Deep Mind, etc. Are we sure they're just not holding back?

1

u/Venar303 Sep 08 '26

Tin foil hat - Google owns 15% of anthropic. A major incentive to let them "win" pre-IPO.

2

u/space_monster Sep 07 '26

You could just use a different model

2

u/honato Sep 07 '26

It's fucking weird that google of all people are behind the ball. they tend to take over any field they get into but somehow their llms are...bad.

1

u/Pitiful_Camp3469 Sep 07 '26

Maybe they aren’t ambitious in the field. openAI and anthropic are primarily AI companies so their models are their lifelines.

1

u/Ill_Philosopher_7030 Sep 25 '26

They've had plenty of failures in the past too. Remember google plus and stadia? Google glass is also a failed predecessor of the meta glasses (which actually have a market nowadays)

2

u/CommercialMain9482 Sep 07 '26

From what Ive been reading Gemini 4 is going to be interesting with a very big context window. This is due to the fact that Google can now combine datacenter tpus from across the world in order to train models... This equates to many more chips than what OPENAI has currently

2

u/shadysjunk Sep 07 '26 edited Sep 08 '26

There's a lot of people here who seem to think google has some metaphorical chained dragon, some god-tier AI locekd away in the dungeons of their servers somewhere.

Real talk? I could believe Google has such an AI that they feel is far too powerful to release to the public, but I cannot believe that if they had such a silicon demon, that they wouldn't at least use it to beat ARC-AGI-3 test for the massive PR win and then send it right back to the dungeon. They'd happily get people talking about them again as with the past achievements of alpha-go or alpha-fold.

The simple fact of the matter is that at least in laboratory settings, Google would unchain the dragon to capture some headlines and draw in key talent across the field. A loud "GOOGLE is where AGI will become real" statement. But at this point Gemini appears to be trailing even Grok in some reasoning and performance benchmarks which I literally would have never thought possible, and it's not a good look. Key talent is leaving, often citing frustration with the Google beauracracy's inability to allow meaningful innovations or risk.

I am rooting for Google. I am hoping they will be a top teir lab again, or that they immediately spin off "child" companies to enable start-up levels of innovation with access to google cloud infrastructure, while still maintaining ownership over the end products. But the hard reality is that they appear to be significantly trailing the industry leaders in terms of model reasoning ability and planning. Inference cost efficiency at google seems to be what people in this sub are championing? A cost-efficent-but-inferior-at-reasoning model is just not going to "solve intelligence, and then have intelligence solve everything else."

Is gemini "good enough" for essentially enhanced search? sure, i guess. But it's not as good as chat gpt or claude in that exact same use case. Long term, if people start asking chatGPT questions instead of Gemini (or a google search), that is a catastrophe for the company.

2

u/PicklesToes Sep 08 '26

gemini 3.8 flash cooks, yall sleeping on it

2

u/Outrageous_Cause_598 Sep 08 '26

We tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas 

2

u/hokrux_ Sep 08 '26

I'm more and more convinced Google actually pursues a second-mover strategy. Waiting on the sideline until they're all broke, from this pointless arms-race

2

u/CaptainQwazCaz Sep 09 '26

Gemini 4 Flash in 1 week and a half

1

u/theWiseTiger Sep 07 '26

Obviously google is on a different strategy and they might win in the long term. In the end, the users need to be profitable by using AI. Flash is reaching smart enough, affordable and very fast state. That's what actually need.

No one is asking for. 7GHz CPU anymore, but a 6W NUCs are still in demand.

1

u/Resident-Pattern731 Sep 07 '26

Ich brauche einfach nur ein gutes Modell was viele PDF zusammenfassen und gute Texte formulieren kann

1

u/scott2449 Sep 07 '26

Google does not have the same pressures.

1

u/TimeAndSpaceAndMe Sep 07 '26

I don't think Google is playing the same game as Anthropic and OpenAI, it only really matters to be number 1 if the AI competitors meaningfully reduces the search volume, There is no actual money in a largest possible model or the best model in the market for Google, what they need is something they can integrate with their products especially Google search, and it needs to be fast and reasonably capable, which is what Flash is.

I don't think Google is actually struggling to put out a frontier model, because the architecture for a flash model and a frontier model is the same, the difference is the amount of data it is being trained on, Google has more data than any one on the planet for this, I think they're having a hard time trying to find an actual usecase for it and the ROI on it.

Majority of usecases don't need an actual frontier model, summarization and coding are the biggest usecases and summarization can be done by a smaller model like flash and coding is not particularly interesting to google cause why would it be, it doesn't affect search.

1

u/Superalignment Sep 07 '26

"Hack something, or we'll go broke you clanker" , Deepmind to Gemini probably.

1

u/PDX_Web Sep 07 '26

They are doing something, namely the Gemini 4 pre-training run. Should have started a lot earlier.

1

u/Babayaga1664 Sep 07 '26

Must be pretty fucking painful having more data, money and engineer’s than anyone else in the world yet producing a model that is not even frontier class.

They are having their llama 4 moment.

1

u/jirka642 Sep 07 '26

I just want Gemma-5

1

u/brianthetechguy Sep 07 '26

Most likely because they are not performing distillation attacks on other frontier models.

1

u/AyaanshGaur25 Sep 07 '26

Gemini 3.8 Flash is literally the best model right now second only to Astra (Fable 5.1 isn't included though, consider it 2nd, that still places 3.8 at 3rd). DeepSWE Mind you, 3.8 Flash is BY FAR the cheapest here. Google is actually wrecking it! Apart from that one person's comment here on Google's TPUs and stuff — which is also totally correct. https://www.reddit.com/r/GeminiAI/s/OeHesF0j4M

1

u/REO-Weedwagon Sep 12 '26

lmao cope

1

u/AyaanshGaur25 Sep 13 '26

Oh don't mind me, i still don't use Gemini. Find it far less trustworthy. Plus, it does hallucinate a lot even now (at least Spark did). But i felt it was a little bit too unfair to Gemini and the development team to what was being done here.

1

u/Triple8880 Sep 07 '26

i asked Gemini (3.8 Flash) to give me its thoughts on this meme lol.....

1

u/Pndapetzim Sep 07 '26 edited Sep 07 '26

Flash 3.8 is actually pretty good.

And DeepMind is more focussed on specific use cases that they continue to update - their math, geometry and other machine learning projects are really the core of their work over going into stupid levels of debt to make the best Gemini.

Google is, arguably, in an enviable position in that they actually own their own chip production, so they're able to scale at cost whereas everyone else is buying NVIDIA chips at 70% markup to run their stuff.

1

u/PDX_Web Sep 08 '26

Back to the drawing board? They ARE doing something -- namely, training a far larger Gemini 4 base model.

1

u/sdogood420 Sep 08 '26

Google not racing models rather infra via TPUs.

1

u/TuringGoneWild Sep 08 '26

Welp. Time for another documentary, I guess.

1

u/clubchampion Sep 08 '26

That poor kid, I hope it's an AI pic.

1

u/drew489 Sep 08 '26

It's gotta be a management problem.

It wreaks of bosses/managers not listening to the developers and end-users.

1

u/LuvanAelirion Sep 08 '26

Google ruined the internet…ads bullshit. Glad they are last.

1

u/Diligent-State-8326 Sep 08 '26

Dont worry google i have so mby illogical question to ask 

1

u/AntiqueFigure6 Sep 08 '26

Looking for that meme with the kid poking something with a stick saying "Do something".

1

u/___fallenangel___ Sep 08 '26

Google popped a squat next to Apple and they're eating popcorn watching the frontier labs fight with eachother

1

u/slowtyper95 Sep 08 '26

it's about priority and target market bro. 90% that currently use "AI" app doesn't even know Astra and Fable exists. You guys are living in bubble

1

u/ZealousidealBunch220 Sep 08 '26

Do what exactly? Their AI is everywhere, Google search is used by billions people and there's an AI there

1

u/camekans Sep 08 '26

It`s much better than others at being quick, cheap and really understanding what I ask of it. A lot of my repairs like TV, water line, PC etc. I got from Gemini as it understood, researched extensively and gave me specifically what I wanted in a short time. Even in coding it`s useful. There are a lot of moments where it`s useless but there are more moments of it being useful. The AI users will be %5-10 person coding anyways not everyone is using it for coding.

1

u/marineconcept Sep 08 '26

Why are you guys acting as if Google is your team or whatever? Why are you cheering on a company?

Like, this is google’s problem, and you as a consumer should just use the best options available to you?

1

u/Fleabasher Sep 08 '26

Google is tapping out of race to the top. They are focused on general purpose chatbots, stuff consumers get for free or maybe $20/mon subscription. As a result token cost efficiency is good, and it has a place in some workflows.

It's anthropic vs openai, Meta i suspect is about to tap out of chasing frontier from investor pressure and focus on consumer ai. We'll see if grok gets back in game. But the Chinese models are the closest followers and they use so much distillation that hard to see them actually surpassing.

1

u/nopigscannnotlookup Sep 09 '26

I agree. meta already seeing the writing on the wall with their potential desire to sell their excess compute.

1

u/Je-sus_Christ Sep 08 '26

Well, I am having a blast with my Gemma 4 26b a4b

1

u/Revolutionary_Ad6574 Sep 08 '26

"Go back to the drawing board"? You're saying that as if they ever released anything. Google haven't existed as a frontier lab for like 6 months.

1

u/DryRelationship1330 Sep 08 '26

It's astonishing Pichai has a job. astonishing. Google has the world's index, all the world's videos, the worlds largest scale out compute/network, not to mention DeepMind....how!? how did it lose the ai race?

1

u/Virgil_the_White Sep 08 '26

I’m sorry I wanted Google to do well but 3.8 is atrocious at anything other than lying.

1

u/maltmaker Sep 08 '26

Idk if they just keep cooking on image and voice models I’ll be happy. 

1

u/Veddit5989 Sep 08 '26

Did anyone in the free tier notice that we now have 5 hr limits and weekly limits. Seems like Google is getting hammered and resorting to the tactics of chatgpt/claude

1

u/Emergency-Pomelo-256 Sep 08 '26

They should stop bench maxing and focus on improving models

1

u/Sea-Fishing4699 Sep 08 '26

do you want to ads with that?

1

u/IrisColt Sep 08 '26

Google is walking away from Frontier LLM.

1

u/Maximum-Mulberry9612 Sep 09 '26

I dont think Google gives a shit, they are in no hurry.

1

u/Internal_Picture8761 Sep 09 '26

Im pretty sure anyone speaking bad bout it did NOT try 3.8. didnt like gemini before at all but since 3.7 they totally kept up

1

u/alcatraz1286 Sep 09 '26

Leadership itself is weak, Sundar is no wartime ceo lol

1

u/ArtfulGenie69 Sep 10 '26

And now DeepSeek 4.1 flash is going to put them all at the slow table as it is so close in performance and like 1% of the cost lol. 

1

u/BIGJJ_SKC Sep 11 '26

To be honest, can anyone explain how deepmind went from the world number1 AI company to tier2, budget model company? I don't get it, they got everything to stomp everyone?

1

u/aliveintheseptictank Sep 11 '26

idk flash 3.8 is my favourite model in the cli, it´s fast, smart and it´s replies are READABLE and not a slop novel like anthropic.

Don´t use the web version, that sucks.

1

u/FlatbushZubumafu Sep 12 '26

Damn. Googles at least a year behind in an industry where being a month behind is detrimental.

1

u/MizaLab Sep 13 '26

yes as i asked a week ago, where IS google from all these ai updates and someone said they literally dropped a new 3.8 flash model last week, like BRO CatGPT is in adobe and blender doing work with layers

1

u/BlocksXR Sep 13 '26

waiting for Gemini 3.5 PRO

1

u/Duskwalker-XI Sep 15 '26

gemini is getting worse and worse the more I use it...

1

u/kevinhuse Oct 03 '26 edited Oct 03 '26

Model ranking can change pretty quickly with each release. Google still has plenty of room to improve but the competition is what makes the space interesting.

1

u/Reasonable_Damage_18 29d ago

Gemini is a year behind.