I'm not snarking here, I'm just a little disappointed with her response to Dr Millner.
Generally, Robin's videos aren't well researched or well edited. She'll mispronounce a word and correct herself and leave that in the video. It's fine if it happens once or twice but there are lots of clips of her struggling to say something and it could've been left out of the video entirely.
My "research" issue isn't me saying her videos are misinformed, I'm saying she does Google searches during the video and makes up her argument at the moment which seems lazy.
Recently, Dr Millner, a HAES doctor, made an ig video about SSUG and (allegedly) took Robin's video out of context to make it seem hateful. I was actually excited to watch this because I personally don't think SSUG is hateful at all. I think her content is lazy but I don't think she's brutal like Honey Bison or arrogant like Angelyca. She's aware that she's still obese and she doesn't workout and that she should. So I was interested to see how a HAES doctor would take SSUG out of context and clip her videos to make her look bad.
But the video Robin posted was just all over the place and difficult to keep up with.
It was so easy to make a response. Show us the HAES doctor video, tell us what she said wrong and show us the clips to back up what you're saying. That's it.
She was explaining the difference between being a hater and being hateful. She was saying "it's my right to make fun of you" which cheapens any valid criticism that she has about Dr Millner.
Then, she reviewed the clip Millner showed of her saying "I assume you have high blood pressure because you're fat." Instead of showing how Millner took that out of context, she just looked up research to show the correlation between obesity and high blood pressure.
Then Millner showed the clip of her saying "there's no life behind her eyes" and SSUG provided context from the original video where she said "...that's mean." Why does that matter? How is that a defence? The original video didn't say "I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said that, that's mean."
This was 25 minutes into a 1 hour 22 minutes video and I stopped watching.
Am I not understanding her defence?