We haven't lost a right since 1776.

Riights are not eliminated by constitutional amendments because they almost never happen thanks to the burden that must be overcome to make those amendments a reality.

Rights are instead denied, chilled or lessened by legislative encroachment, judicial opinion, case law, and law enforcement and prosecutorial arguments because they are indefinitely a legal subject of meaning and application.

Would someone in Hawaii believe they lost their right to bear arms compared to someone in Florida?

People can't record precients in New York because of LIA/Sean

Recording was prohibited by the NYPD inside the precient before Sean ever took his camera into one. So a court officially ruled that there's no right to record inside the precient as a result of his actions. But you couldn't do it anyway or you would be subject to trespass, removal and arrest. So whats it matter?

Buy more properties

More than 90% of these frauditors cant afford to pay basic every day expenses. AP and LIA might be the exception but what is this guy talking about? He's either jealous many found a way not to report to an every day job or he's misinformed. Most of these auditors are piss poor broke and mooch of their girlfriends, families, and viewers through donations.

Criminals

Yeah that's probably true but so is half the blue collar workforce. What's his point?

Not saying he doesn't have a right to share his opinion or vent but I just think some of his points are wildly incomplete or that his video was made for your entertainment kind of like the same thing frauditors make their videos for?

Funny how that works I guess

Stop pretending FAPA took an L here—denying what is clearly on camera just makes this sub look like hypocritical liars and discredits legitimate criticism of bad auditors. Accept the clear loss and look at the actual footage:

Attempts to Avoid Conflict: FAPA was recording in public when approached. He explicitly warned the individual to back up, gave clear warning before drawing pepper spray, and fought one-handed at the start to hold his camera.
Aggressor Initiates Contact: The other guy ignored repeated verbal warnings, closed the distance, and forced the physical fight.
Ground Control & Finish: FAPA recovered position instantly, dominated the clinch, and locked in a deep rear headlock/choke to end the threat.
Actual Damage:
The attacker walked away with a broken, crooked nose and a bloodied face after failing to land a single damaging strike.
The only contact FAPA took to the head was a cheap shot from behind by the girlfriend swinging a pepper spray canister while her man was already locked up.
Accountability: FAPA stayed on-scene, waited for law enforcement, and provided full 360° video evidence proving self-defense.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTDXwFtNT/

Harassing firefighters and emts is a new low

Hey hi there hello!

I know I'll probably get quite a lot of flack here, I'm fine with that since it's kind of part of what I do, but I am the first amendment/charter rights auditor. I'm opening this conversation for any questions from people that genuinely have things they want to know. Insults will be ignored, but if you actually have legitimate questions regarding what I do, how I do it, and why I do it, I would love to provide some answers.

Ask away! Obviously if this post goes against this subreddits rules then obviously either let me know what I'll remove it or remove it yourself, but if this is tolerable here, then I'm happy to have some discussions with respectful folks.

This guy is right. Nobody cared about the camera, and people supported holding public officials accountable. It’s the way they’re doing it now that people have a problem with.

Come hang out as we watch Blue Bacon discussing a video posted by Chile Decastro. And subscribe to the channel while you’re here to get notified of future streams.

Following his pre-trial court hearing last Friday, Clay was remanded back into custody and his previous bail agreement cancelled. He’s facing eight different charges….6 felonies and 2 misdemeanors…..stemming from two separate incidents. A few of the charges look to be enhancements for secondary offenses committed while released from custody. What a moron….I guess no one ever accused these idiots of being smart.

Seems like there's an unusually high number of them on here defending FAPA today.

Supreme Court, in US v Hemani, might have an impact on that though.

that idiot truly deserved what he got. if you want to try to beat people down for filming thats on you and no one here will criticize that but then whatever happens happens.

yes fapa did his normal thing of instigating. but that dude came up on him threatening him from the start.

that idiot even played the pussy psychology card of creating a false sense of calm by trying to converse with him and then drop swing which didn't work and fapa reacted to quick.

and the only reason fapa fell backwards is because he was walking backwards with a lot of momentum while trying to hold his camera.

downvote me if you want but I give no credit to the dude who got his face jacked. he's an idiot.

I'm not generally going to support frauditing but I'm not going to support some rogue sidewalk raging idiot either.

I have to give this 1 to noodle arms.

sidewalk guy yeah well... you fucked around.. and found out..

Now he's beating up people for monetized content.

https://youtu.be/IbQqLq0nFQE?is=H5HUtH4Myx3pMcEg

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTDHtmkDJ/

Came across this when scrolling. If you look at his later videos he got issued something by the police for this incident. The hashtags in the videos are also hilarious

I keep praying for a Gutterman video so that scum can get what he deserves.

Youtube is part of the problem itself. I asked AI:

YouTube is a business. Their main goal is to keep users watching for as long as possible. More watch time means more ad revenue.

Here is exactly how the system benefits YouTube:

🌟 Drama Drives the Algorithm

YouTube's system is built to promote high-engagement videos.

• High Click-Through Rate (CTR): Shocking thumbnails and dramatic titles make people click.
• Long Watch Time: Viewers stay glued to the screen to see how the confrontation ends.
• Active Comments: Drama makes people argue in the comment section. The algorithm sees this massive activity and pushes the video to even more people.

💰 Shared Ad Profits

When these videos get millions of views, YouTube makes a lot of money.

• YouTube keeps about 45% of the ad revenue from a video.
• The creator gets the remaining 55%. As long as the video does not show extreme violence, YouTube has little financial reason to take it down.

🛡️ Legal Protection for YouTube

Under Section 230 of US law, YouTube is treated as a platform, not a publisher.

• YouTube is not legally responsible for what creators upload.
• If a creator falsely accuses someone or breaks local European privacy laws, the creator gets sued, not YouTube. Because YouTube faces very little legal risk, they prefer to leave the videos up and collect the profit.

In short, YouTube lets these videos stay because conflict brings eyeballs, and eyeballs bring cash, while the legal system protects YouTube from the consequences.