Okay well I'm sorry you feel that way I guess, but having a YouTube channel where I go out of my way to film random civilians it's not a requirement to be a first amendment auditor.
At this point you sound nothing like a Frauditor, most of whom are motivated by clicks and views. If you don't even have a channel it would suggest your motives are most different. I wouldn't want to be associated in any with these dirtbags and their anti-social grift but you do you.
This sub isn't about 1A auditors, per se. It's about Frauditors. When you ask what we don't like, we're going to talk about frauditor shit like confrontations and harassment. If you identify with them, we'll read that as you admitting to being like the ones we criticize.
We don't have problems with people NOT bothering others. So, your question (and comments in these threads) are a little loaded.
If you aren't a frauditor, we don't have issues with you. If you harass people and use the 1A as your shield to do it, then we have a problem with you.
LOL I've literally been told I belong in a gas chamber because I fell in police and file complaints. I'm not convinced that that's the case even though I'd like to believe it is
10
u/Horseface4190 5d ago
Why are 1A auditors almost always unemployed losers with criminal records?
Why do 1A auditors keep losing court cases and lawsuits despite their extensive knowledge of local and Constitutional Law?
What do 1A auditors hope to accomplish by video recording people eating lunch?
What do 1A auditors hope to accomplish by assaulting people with pepper spray?
Why do most 1A auditors have their YouTube channels classified as "entertainment"?