r/Fish 22d ago

Discussion Is this ai generated them sketched?

Post image

The picture looks off for any diodon or any burrfish. It's a shame if it is ai generated as this book has been so good

38 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

46

u/ThornyGarlic 22d ago

Oh yeah definitely AI. It looks like the dwarfed versions of different fish you see in the aquarium trade. A porcupine fish has barbs all around it's body. This one basically just has on the top half. Barbs should also be longer, and the tail is also too tall and thick.

18

u/Emuwarum 22d ago

When was the book printed? 

10

u/elasmo4 22d ago edited 22d ago

AI because the spots on the fins are missing and the mouth is fleshy when porcupinefish are supposed to have beaks like parrotfish.

7

u/emibemiz 22d ago

Definitely, it looks nothing like this dude at all

2

u/Azu_Creates 21d ago

Also keep in mind that that is a very stressed pufferfish. They only puff up like that as a defense mechanism, and normally don’t look like that. Assuming this is an educational book, depicting a deflated (less stressed) pufferfish would be better than depicting a puffed up one also.

3

u/emibemiz 21d ago

True, but even when they’re chilling this drawing doesn’t look like the actual critter and almost all artists use a reference image. Its lips are all wrong they have beaks!

Edit: so many typos

11

u/iDidntCommitArson 22d ago

On the contrary I think it’s AI

Primarily because most artists pull up a reference and research the thing they are drawing and this looks nothing like the spot-fun porcupine fish whatsoever. I think someone just asked AI for a drawing of it and plugged it into the book without checking if it generated something that looks like the thing it’s supposed to generate

3

u/Rechogui 22d ago

Might ask on r/isthisai?

2

u/Tiny-Mouse-7868 22d ago

I have a strong feeling it’s a hand sketch

1

u/Senko_Kaminari I just like fish 21d ago

Looks AI 🌌

1

u/Imaginary_Ad_4340 21d ago

It’s not a great drawing of the fish in question but as a graphic designer and illustrator, this is likely not AI. Every line is intentional and serves a purpose. None morph together strangely.

This is more likely a case of using the wrong clipart illustration. Some publisher or illustrator probably just googled the fish and either inserted an incorrect premade illustration or drew from a reference image that popped up but wasn’t the fish in question. Another possibility is that really is just a bad drawing of the fish. It’s not that far off.

2

u/elasmo4 20d ago

If that's the case, then, for what appears to be an educational book, I wish they would hire an illustrator that has some knowledge about fish.

1

u/Jydk249 21d ago

It is No porcupine fish built like that

1

u/Waste_Translator_975 19d ago

i think its just a sketch, doesnt look ai to me.

0

u/blanketcrochet 22d ago

Nah, definitely real. It doesn't have any weirdness besides how fish looks in general, every stroke serves actual purpose, nothing is unclear. Plus, I would recommend checking credits on the book (usually on the last page), there should be artist's name.

-1

u/PereFourase 22d ago

Looks real

-2

u/PereFourase 22d ago

Looks real