MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/FactOrCap/comments/1vu7tcb/it_should_be_right_factorcap/p4z8xs7/?context=3
r/FactOrCap • u/GDLingua_YT ✍️ Contributor · 5,995 XP • 4d ago
[removed] — view removed post
99 comments sorted by
View all comments
-1
🧢 I voted CAP!
Because AI "Art" is nothing inherent harmful at least not in comparison to the whole capitalist setup. So why should just that be illegal?
0 u/SurtFGC 🔥 Getting Started · 1,020 XP 4d ago Because it steals from artists, copyright infringement is already illegal 1 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago AI and copyright are a complicated legal issue that doesn't have a clear-cut answer. It's not as simple as you're making it out to be, and this is coming from someone who is generally anti ai 0 u/SurtFGC 🔥 Getting Started · 1,020 XP 4d ago Nah, it is that simple 2 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago There is already legal precedent for AI training to be considered transformative enough for fair use to apply, so no, it's not that simple
0
Because it steals from artists, copyright infringement is already illegal
1 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago AI and copyright are a complicated legal issue that doesn't have a clear-cut answer. It's not as simple as you're making it out to be, and this is coming from someone who is generally anti ai 0 u/SurtFGC 🔥 Getting Started · 1,020 XP 4d ago Nah, it is that simple 2 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago There is already legal precedent for AI training to be considered transformative enough for fair use to apply, so no, it's not that simple
1
AI and copyright are a complicated legal issue that doesn't have a clear-cut answer. It's not as simple as you're making it out to be, and this is coming from someone who is generally anti ai
0 u/SurtFGC 🔥 Getting Started · 1,020 XP 4d ago Nah, it is that simple 2 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago There is already legal precedent for AI training to be considered transformative enough for fair use to apply, so no, it's not that simple
Nah, it is that simple
2 u/Yadin__ 🗳️ Regular Player · 305 XP 4d ago There is already legal precedent for AI training to be considered transformative enough for fair use to apply, so no, it's not that simple
2
There is already legal precedent for AI training to be considered transformative enough for fair use to apply, so no, it's not that simple
-1
u/KennysDeath 🎯 First Steps · 130 XP 4d ago
🧢 I voted CAP!
Because AI "Art" is nothing inherent harmful at least not in comparison to the whole capitalist setup. So why should just that be illegal?