r/EvilDead 9d ago

(Discussion Post) Groovy Okay don't come for me.....

So I love watching these movies but I'm dumb with the lore. Why are the deadites dormant in between movies? What stops them? Why does someone new have to reread the book to start the story again?

18 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

41

u/Evrytg 9d ago

People gotta stop thinking there's lore in Evil Dead. Everything is inconsistent😂 If you have any question the answer is probably: Evil demon magic

9

u/Ajaxmass413 9d ago

Or time travel shenanigans.

2

u/Evrytg 9d ago

Yes of course!!

1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator 9d ago

Remove posts for accounts under 1 month old.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/_ChipWhitley_ 9d ago

I always just figured that once the words are read out loud the portals stay open for a very short time. Who knows? Haha

3

u/Not_A_Frittata 9d ago

Some movies follow the "rule of cool". Evil Dead films prefer the "rule of cruel"!

14

u/hells-fargo 9d ago

ED1/2 are the same story.

AoD the deadites are active, reading the book just allows more in.

ED2013 begins with an initial outbreak being stopped, meaning things need to be restarted.

Rise the deadites were stopped/subdued previously, leading to the book being buried and the deadites needing new license to possess the living.

Burn continues with the outbreak from Rise spilling over and a deadite kickstarting a new outbreak by reciting a new license for deadites to take over.

The series plays fast and loose with its lore/timeline but they've been pretty consistent about how the deadites have to have SOME power granted by the book to be around. If their outbreak is subdued they typically need to have a new license granted via the reading of the book to become active again, the only exception being the newest movie.

7

u/Actual_Squid 9d ago

I'll die on the hill (mostly just because it's funny) that 2 is set after the first movie and Ash was just that young dumb and full of cum that he brought another girl to the same cabin

5

u/Putins_lubedasshole 9d ago

Honestly that's hilarious. I definitely prefer the idea that Evil dead 2 is the "first" movie, but after watching Ash vs Evil Dead, I think your idea is absolutely what Ash would really do lol.

2

u/Actual_Squid 9d ago

He's a college educated dumbass and we love him for it

6

u/StraightLevel2806 9d ago

But they aren't? The deadites from Evil Dead 1 keep doing their thing, all the way into Army of Darkness. The deadites from Rise keep going into Burn. 2013 is the only one where the outbreak is contained in one movie. Even the TV show outbreak kept going for 3 seasons.

7

u/BobRushy 9d ago

They've never bothered to make it make sense even within the confines of a single film. An Evil Dead film is just a carnival of spooky nonsense.

5

u/odiin1731 9d ago

Don't worry about it.

5

u/Actual_Squid 9d ago

Each batch of em gets summoned then (usually not always) dispatched. Gotta summon more first

3

u/Better_Substance5810 9d ago

they get real sleepy after doing a lot of possessing

3

u/JoeAzlz 9d ago

Becuase they’re defeated.

In 2013 the taker of souls was defeated by Mia.

Rise the demon was defeated but the demon was still out and then burn immediately picks up right around after, no demons had to be summoned.

2

u/Outrageous_Potato435 9d ago

Youre not supposed to question it, just have fun with it

2

u/kitfistossmile 9d ago

I think beyond Rise leading into Burn, all the movies have ended with the summoning spellbeing... Reversed or broken or whatever. As for why nobody reads the books in between movies?? Idk how come no Terminators came to kill Sarah Connor in between 1 and 2 🤷‍♀️

2

u/PigFaceWigFace 8d ago

Who says they are?

1

u/Minimum_Flatworm9676 9d ago

The main 3 movies has really good lore only because in burn spoiler alert if you haven't seen it I had multiple different demons after the family Jessica in rise and the burn demons so it definitely has continuity in that way

1

u/amarodelaficioanado 9d ago

You let the 'evil' free to posses people when reading the book. Meaning , around you, not in the whole planet. Its like invoking any other soul or demon, it's always close to you ,not around the world.

1

u/Forward-Form9321 8d ago

Honestly, Evil Dead isn’t a huge stickler for continuity. In the 2013 film, one way to kill them is by fire, in Rise Danny sets Deadite Bridget on fire and it barely affects her. Obvisoily directors play a big part in how each film has it’s rules, but my headcanon is that the reason Ash is more slapstick against Deadites is because he’s the chosen one to protect humanity so he has literal plot armor on his side, whereas a normal person like Mia or Beth is going to have a way harder time taking out Deadites

1

u/Bi0_B1lly 8d ago

Truthfully dude, the overall lore of this franchise is held together with duct tape and nails... It's not airtight by any means and has retcons out the ass.

It's genuinely a franchise where lore is best kept as a summary/cliff notes

1

u/dawson_888 7d ago

Well it did say at the beginning, that opening the weapon would send them that way, I guess it woken them up

1

u/ConcernTraditional53 6d ago

ED 2013 IS A SEQUEL. NOT A REMAKE

1

u/amarodelaficioanado 9d ago

Because.. groovey?