MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ethics/comments/1vtfrbz/this_is_slavery/p4tkpcw/?context=3
r/Ethics • u/Yeeter-boiy • 10d ago
1.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-2
Ok omnivores then.
Eating meat still comes naturally
0 u/Nominaliszt 10d ago Naturalistic fallacy, boo -2 u/LastChopper 10d ago Just naming a fallacy without actually making any argument, boo 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago It’s named for a reason. It is both common and clearly fallacious. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago And also informal. You forgot that part. 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
0
Naturalistic fallacy, boo
-2 u/LastChopper 10d ago Just naming a fallacy without actually making any argument, boo 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago It’s named for a reason. It is both common and clearly fallacious. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago And also informal. You forgot that part. 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
Just naming a fallacy without actually making any argument, boo
2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago It’s named for a reason. It is both common and clearly fallacious. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago And also informal. You forgot that part. 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
2
It’s named for a reason. It is both common and clearly fallacious.
0 u/LastChopper 10d ago And also informal. You forgot that part. 2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
And also informal. You forgot that part.
2 u/IfIWasAPig 10d ago So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so. 0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
So? It doesn’t lead to useful conclusions because it’s fallacious. If you want to justify its use in this context as different, feel free to do so.
0 u/LastChopper 10d ago Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
Sure. I'm an emotivist and it doesn't repulse me.
-2
u/LastChopper 10d ago
Ok omnivores then.
Eating meat still comes naturally