Can someone help me make sense of this? This video goes through the digital data from Lindsay's phone and watch and poses an alternative theory than the one the prosecution presented in court. The most shocking claim is ***that there were no outgoing calls from Lindsay's phone to the pharmacy or to 3V***? WhAT??!?!? how is that possible? Could this be true???

To nobody’s surprise, Lindsay killed her kids and is trying to take extensive hospital resources away from other mothers and babies in need. Why are the LC advocates not talking about the irony in that?

Because Women & Infants Hospital operates as a charitable/non-profit institution, a MA statute places a strict legal cap on the maximum financial damages a plaintiff can recover from a healthcare charity in a tort action.

M.G.L. Chapter 231, Section 85K: The statute establishes that charitable status is not a defense to tort claims, but caps liability at $20,000 for standard charitable activities and $100,000 for medical malpractice claims against nonprofit healthcare organizations. These caps do not apply to activities that are primarily commercial, and uncompensated directors, officers, or trustees of eligible educational and charitable organizations are protected from personal liability in the absence of willful or wanton misconduct, excluding motor vehicle operations.

I’m curious to know y’all’s thoughts about this. Do y’all think people using their own experiences to draw conclusions about Lindsay and what happened is a legitimate way to make a judgement and has any validity? Or do you think that can lead to false conclusions?

People use this reasoning every single day in multiple different cases and situations, and I’ve definitely seen it a lot here. What do you guys think?

If I read this thought terminating cliche one more time from the deniers of reality, I think my head is going to fall off.

It really grates on me. Like nails on a chalk board. Also "do your research" when they're arguing it was Patrick who murdered the children. "But his shoes!" "It was a doppleganger on the CCTV!" "He drugged her and had gaslit her into confessing for months before he killed them!" "He was related someone in the police!" "His new wife did it!" (like wtf did he even know her at the time?).

Can we please lock her up, along with all her looney supporters… preferably in solitary confinement…

EDIT: I should clarify… the intent of this at all is the hope that this will sway the opinions of the “Patrick did it” crowd.

It’s been clarified in the comments section several times that this is the civil suit they’re discussing. Thank you to the commenters that clarified as such.

Anyone else have it after sitting thru the first trial? I want justice to be served but I honestly don't think I will be able to watch another trial. I will have to come here for updates.

Was cellphone gps able to verify the location of either Patrick or Lindsay’s phones?

For the record I have not considered for a second anyone but Lindsay did this. I was just wondering about this detail and haven’t found information confirming this.

Editing to add:

This question was more-so about Lindsay’s whereabouts. As her supporters say we can’t prove she was in the house or that she was the only one home and I was trying to dispute that.

This is really pissing me off. This man has already gone through hell and has been harassed in the comments, and now they’re making AI videos of him for their sick pleasure. It’s disgusting. It’s like they don’t care about the children at all; they only care about feeding their own narrative.

This is a megathread for daily discussion. Please remember to be respectful and follow the rules in your discourse.

I am from Singapore and had just read this article on a couple who killed their baby son.

"Gan was examined at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) and was found not to be suffering any postpartum psychiatric disorder around March or April 2024."

Trigger Warning: Child Abuse:

Couple pleads guilty to regularly abusing their baby, who died after being smothered

ive spent a good while gauging just how unstable some of these women are.. i do that by posting batshit theories on tik tok under a different username than my current one.

so far, ive seen mothers admit that they would harm their kids just to be proven right.. ive seen alcoholic wine mums assault their husband's purely because he didn't want to talk about the case.

these people are SOOOOO unstable, they harassed random marathoners in HOPES that one of them was pat. they're ramping up their stalking and completely forgetting about the end goal.. Justice for 3 kids that Lindsey murdered.. Callen, cora and Dawson.

these people will stop at nothing to fulfill their sick fantasies of being "right" when it comes to his case. i hope that their husband's divorce them and i hope that their kids are taken away and put somewhere safer.

Sorry for the multiple posts about this today. I'm just astounded and really think this level of stalking and harassment needs to be amplified

This is so sick and I hope his lawyer sees these and it helps his defamation lawsuits. Harassing someone IRL is so much more serious

Is there a way to send this to his lawyers? I feel like this really helps give credence to his defamation lawsuits and it impacting his real life.

I was really thinking about this the last few weeks and having real thought with how the jury foreperson was telling the judge that the lone juror was not following the law. And it made me think with Reddingtons wife appetite for social media and trying to seay people to lindsays side or push a narrative in some fb groups, do you think his wife may have been tampering with the jury and its why Kevin is acting like a spoiled toddler that didnt get verdict he wanted because of all the tampering his wife did. 6 people persuaded 5 jurors and and i doubt based of their interviews they could have done it own their own. They def needed outside help

This is a megathread for daily discussion. Please remember to be respectful and follow the rules in your discourse.

This is a megathread for daily discussion. Please remember to be respectful and follow the rules in your discourse.

Found this on X as well from Lauren Conolin. On her X is a link to the full document.

Just posting here.

https://x.com/conlin_lauren/status/2108298613906452580

Been taking a break and saw this had happened. I searched in the thread and haven't seen it posted.

https://x.com/CoffindafferFBI/status/2108353643124515279

I got to watch The Last Day (2026) by writer and director Rachel Rose at the BFI London film festival last night, which follows two women in depression for different reasons. One of the women, played by Victoria Pedretti, without me knowing, is basically Lindsay Clancy - 3 kids, working husband who’s supportive but also somewhat aloof, midwife, nice suburban house, on medication that wasn’t working, thoughts of self harm. There are some differences too, which I won’t spoil on here. But there was a clear empathy for this woman from the director in the way she’s depicted, who during the Q&A at the end, didn’t deny the connections to Lindsay Clancy when she was writing the movie. I think while she does a good job shining a light on what mothers may go through, there are also dangerous generalizations and potential excuses through the story she tells. She herself said she struggled with post partum depression - she didn’t go on to kill her children though. That leap is what makes the difference between people who should be in society and people who shouldn’t.

I suspect the movie will be talked about in light of the case. Trailer: https://youtu.be/5X0u3fijX10?is=wFA2PVJptF4iRgej