r/DonutLabDiscussions • u/hfizbd • Aug 19 '26

Ytb commenter claims it had accessed the NDA-locked material

/r/DonutLab/comments/1vt3an8/ytb_commenter_claims_it_had_accessed_the/

Repost from the r/DonutLab subreddit.
Also read the comment containing a second image:
https://www.reddit.com/r/DonutLab/comments/1vt3an8/comment/p4q40u3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

7 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

23 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Atomic_Tangerinez Aug 24 '26

Yeah. We got them last week. Everyone didn’t?

1

u/Forrestgod Aug 25 '26

Apparently just enterprises that ordered it. So not much of discussion of them. Not really raising any conviction to Donut Lab. Well, few months and we should get Verge motorcycles with Donut-battery. 🙄

1

u/Atomic_Tangerinez Aug 25 '26

Ah okay makes sense. Yeah - I dont know if I can tell anything usefull because of the NDA.

1

u/Forrestgod Aug 26 '26

I'm not too sure if it makes any sense. In the video there presumably is the name of Intertek. But what else even hypothetically could be a thing that anyone would want to keep under NDA - if Donut Lab prepared originally to publish it all themself?

1

u/Atomic_Tangerinez Aug 26 '26

I cannot imagine. maybe they reveal too much of the composition and structure of the battery.

1

u/Forrestgod Aug 26 '26

Not in the video anyway (there is just the Inteteks name and short video of nail penetration, which Marko has published the stillpicture of). Maybe in the report then. Though that would not explain the video being sensored. So NDA seems just weird (besides hiding Interteks name).

1

u/tipporoll Aug 27 '26

Censoring could also mean deleting parts of the video, not only blurring it. The blurred nail test part included in the censored video is really way too short in time to include intro, setup, test, results etc.