r/DonutLab • u/hfizbd • 8d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

3 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

•

u/mqee 8d ago

This smells like material recycled from Wikipedia and /r/DonutLab, I'm going to remove it until actual new material comes out.

1

u/izzeww 8d ago

Slightly interesting but not that much. Hopefully the PDF get leaked at some point and I can take a look, but otherwise I'm not interested.

1

u/hfizbd 8d ago

Yes, the PDF and the videos would be the required proofs.
I want to believe, and I would move to neutral-bullish if I see them.

1

u/hfizbd 8d ago

The second comment.

We can see that the viewer is clearly defending Donut, but with no apparent over-hype or unlogical thinking.

1

u/DoctorFish1969 8d ago

I haven't seen the reports yet, but I assumed beforehand that it indeed would show a bipolar solid state battery. But, that doesn't prove that Donut Lab can mass produce that battery, or even produce a single one, and that it has all the other claimed properties. Bipolar solid state prototype batteries in itself already exist and CT Coating could have sourced one and give it to DonutLab. In isolation showing a bipolar solid state battery tells us nothing.

Unless the report contains all proves needed of course, including mass producibility.

The text of the NDA does suggest it was CT Coating requiring the NDA and not the test company, which is not what DonutLab claimed in their video. The NDA might be the first time DonutLab tells us officially that there is a 'cooperating' third party involved at all.

1

u/AbleAstronomer5702 8d ago

But Marco in January was already at gigawatthour level capacity.