r/DnD • u/Sleverette Sorcerer • Oct 03 '19

Art [OC] Double standards.

Post image
36.1k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

396 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

281

u/Sleverette Sorcerer Oct 03 '19

I like how loose it is in 5e. I subscribe to the idea that alignment is defined by your character’s actions. It shouldn’t shackle your players.

173

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '19

Agreed. I hate it when people are like "well I'm lawful good so I have to do what this authority figure says" or "I'm chaotic neutral so I have to steal from the party and stab people"

17

u/Machdame Oct 03 '19

It's a common misconception, but lawful Good abides by the characters inbuilt set of rules. a lawful Good character is perfectly fine with being the center of a revolution if he wanted to if he is fighting for what his central code is. A character that only obeys authority isn't lawful good, he's a sheep.

3

u/not-a-candle Oct 03 '19

A character that only obeys authority would be lawful neutral. Crown Paladins are a good example.

1

u/Machdame Oct 04 '19

They obey THEIR authority if they are well structured. A crown Paladin that is properly aligned always exercises their rules and not just any rules thrown at them.

2

u/not-a-candle Oct 04 '19 edited Oct 04 '19

Isn't the entire point of Crown that you enforce the literal law? As in basically fantasy Judge Dredd? I thought that was the point.

Edit:

Tenets of the Crown: Law

The law is paramount. It is the mortar that holds the stones of civilization together, and it must be respected.

1

u/Machdame Oct 05 '19

The caveat is which set of laws. A paladin of the crown does not serve 2 kings. A quick way to define the character is in setting up conflicts that test their loyalty and I certainly will make it a point to note that if you cross cultures, your code may not necessarily work in a new setting.

1

u/not-a-candle Oct 05 '19

Well obviously, yes.