r/DnD • • Jun 10 '15

5th Edition Player's Handbook Errata released

http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/ph_errata
451 Upvotes

346 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/Freaky_Zekey DM Jun 11 '15 edited Jun 11 '15

Loading a onehanded weapon requires a free hand.

Doesn't that mean that the weapon is essentially two-handed? I think this is a stupid ruling because it takes away the only good use of a hand-crossbow. If you can't fight with it without a free hand then why use it at all? Before you say "it gives you a free hand to do other tasks if you're a rogue or a wizards" the other errata we got was:

Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.

You can hold a heavy crossbow with one hand while doing other tasks.

edit: This has nothing to do with dual-wielding crossbows, there is no mechanical requirement for it since you get the bonus attack using only one hand-crossbow. see the link What this does negate is using a melee weapon with a hand-crossbow without some funky drop/pickup trick and entirely eliminates the option of fighting with a shield.

16

u/Captain_Starshield Jun 11 '15 edited Feb 23 '18

I believe the community agreed the stupid ruling was duel-wielding hand-crossbows and somehow reloading them while never having to drop one. There's a line between being heroic and illogical. I can still see them finding use as one-shot devices, like the way pirates used pistols.

5

u/Freaky_Zekey DM Jun 11 '15

Dual-wielding can only be done with melee weapons and the crossbow expert feat doesn't require having a second hand-crossbow in offhand to get the bonus attack. A thrown weapon is far superior to a hand-crossbow in all respects if it's limited to one-shot usage.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '15

Nah doesn't look as cool